Leaderboard
-
-
SpeedFlex27
MembersPoints21,934Posts -
Bigblue204
MembersPoints8,495Posts -
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation since 2026-03-10 in all areas
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Bigblue204 and 6 others reacted to bigg jay for a post in a topic
7 pointsHe must have used ChatGPT to see the projected depth chart where he was listed behind Darian Durant. Chase saw the writing on the wall and decided to hang them up.7 points -
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
HardCoreBlue and 5 others reacted to wbbfan for a post in a topic
6 pointsLow pay, and aiming at that will get you there. The thing is, most rookies are on pretty low contracts once they pay taxes and convert, not to mention living expenses being up here. After all that, even if you come in at 100k, what are you sending home? 25-30 maybe? For anyone with a family, it isn't a living wage being a rookie QB up here. Id say they have good talent. Skill levels, I mean, you always end up picking a tool kit that balances one of arm strength, and accuracy/touch. That's really all throwing sports. And part of the struggle in developing QBs. No different than MLB teams developing pitchers. The throwing talent is completely separate from throwing athleticism, and extraordinarily nuanced. You usually hope to end up with a guy who throws just hard enough and has the ability to put the ball where it needs to go, or a guy with a cannon and athleticism who is as much playing spray and pray in the pass game. Intangibles can be tough to quantify, beyond what you'd expect as well. Because basically all the QBs coming up are at best 2-year starters, it is very hard to tell what is a product of an intangible and what is a fluke or other factors. Back in the day, when every QB going pro was a 3-4 year starter, and a 3-4 year HS starter, you could get a much better evaluation of the guy. Yeah, I mean, teams and players don't want to wait. But at the same time, you only learn so much on the bench. I think young prospects need more seasoning in the first year and a half or so, then after that point. You really have to stress test them. Practice isn't a source of that at all anymore. So we see young guys who have sat for a year or two, know the system, understand most of the nuances of the game, but haven't been battle-hardened enough to be able to make use of those assets. If I were running a team, this is what I would do. Break down the QB prospects into 2 lists. Long list guys, and short list. Long list guys are ones that you've scouted extensively and are ready to keep around for 2 years, almost no matter what. Like how we waited out dru browns early struggles. The short list is guys who have the raw tools you like and may or may not be available. These range from flyers to guys you would watch for a few months to a season to get a better read on while they are on the team. Bring in 4-5 max of these guys. Assuming you have no real QB2, but a starter. You do install with your starter and give heavy, heavy rep time to the prospects. You likely would be lucky to have more than 1 long list guy at a time. So 3-4 short list guys, and as you see critical red flags, you replace them with other short list guys. Mainly, a lack of mental toughness, mental ability to read/progress/improvise, or a lack of the balance of touch/accuracy/release/strength required. You break camp with 3 on the ar, but any time you get one, you should take a vet for QB2. So you end up sitting with 2-3 developmental guys. Any long list guy, or a short list overachiever, goes on the 6-game out of camp. You test the mettle of the remaining kids, cycling them through pr, scout team, heavy drill use, and short yardage stuff on the ar. As they break, you replace them. At 6 games, if any are left standing, you switch them for the first group and sit them on the ir for 6, giving the first group a chance. So you sit a max of 2 QBs on the IR, with a starter/backup, and 2 guys going from pr to ir fighting for a spot. Repeat that grinder until you have 2-3 guys who are at least ready to be between qb2/3. Guys, you can't expect to easily replace them with free agents. Then, you run the blender again with them. You do this and hope to go into the next camp able to move on from QB2 or not being crippled if you lose qb 1. To run this blender, you need to be airlifting and cycling DBs and WRs as well. You can't really practice with QBs facing a real rush, but you can run a ton of Skelly. And you force them to run it on double time to create that friction to struggle against. You call snap, get the QB the ball, and he has to rely on post-snap read and reaction. Shorter than 5-second routes till whistle and next QB up. You'd also need more offensive coaches than D to facilitate running this. You'd each scout to dedicate more time to QBs than the rest, or maybe 1-2 almost full-time on QBs. You probably need to have 2 years to get to the point you want to be at. But most teams' QB plan amounts to either, Hope you hit the lotto, Hope your guy doesn't get hurt/diminish/retire/leave in FA, or Hope someone else can develop a guy who goes to FA that you can poach. Which is how you end up with 40 year old qbs with injury records longer than all the pages Stephen King has written. We are on the cusp of losing BLM, Zach, and Harris in this league. MBT and Masoli are basically done in all but paperwork. Vaj and Fajardo are 33-34 with a ton of wear. The pest hasn't played well outside of or been healthy-ish since 23. As bad as the coming rule changes are, the biggest crisis that the league faces is QBing. If that ship isn't righted with a new group of younger talent, the rest of the stuff will just be the straw that breaks the camels back.6 points -
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
rebusrankin and 4 others reacted to SpeedFlex27 for a post in a topic
5 pointsAs far as quarterbacking talent goes, I have a bit of experience there being the father of a D2 qb at SFU before the purge 4 years ago where the university deep sixed football as a sport. I firmly believe that there are some kids born to play the position. You either have it or you don't. The kids that don't, struggle. Some work hard & make the rise to the top. But it's not easy when someone doesn't have a strong arm. Offenses have to be adjusted. shorter routes, more timing routes, spreading the ball around & not pressing the ball downfield. Then outof nowhere some guy shows up who can throw the ball 60 yards with ease & the kid who worked hard to be a starter with a so so or average arm is benched. I've seen it many times. My son Tyler at age 10 could throw a football 35 yards with no effort. Anything he picked that was throwable he did. He was a pitcher & outfielder in baseball. At 12, he could drill the ball across the plate with accuracy & strike out his opponents. He was one of those kids who magically was born with a super strong arm who figured out how to use it.. Throwing just came naturally. He could out skip me throwing stones on water when he was a kid & I was in my early 40's. Then the intangibles took over for Tyler as he went up thru the ranks playing football at all levels here in Calgary, Winnipeg, California & Burnaby. As he got older & physically stronger, Tyler played with confidence & became a leader. His teammates believed in him when he was on the field. Knowing my son the way I do just seeing the transformation from this happy go lucky guy away from football to a qb who hated losing was amazing. His leadership was his play on the field. His time with the Winnipeg Rifles hit a dead end. He was sharing starting qb duties with another player & both hated it. Tyler had a stronger arm but the other qb also had intangibles that made him successful. Their different styles of play complimented one another. Tyler went in to talk to his head coach at the end of his second season in Winnipeg. The coach indicated that changes would be coming at the qb position next season. As in, they'd pick one guy & stick with him. Tyler being from Calgary got the sense that they'd choose the other qb as he played all of his football in Winnipeg. he also had the advanyage of being coached by some of the guys on the Rifles staff. The other qb would be favoured over him. So, he informed the HC he wasn't coming back. The Head Coach said, "Fine. Good luck to you." So, it turned out he was right after all. Tyler spoke to his qb coach & mentor in Portland, Oregon, Greg Barton as it looked like his football career was over. Barton was a former qb with the Argos who had a lot of connections all down the West Coast. Greg made a phone call to a JUCO in California called The College Of The Siskiyous. The HC called Tyler & invited him down to see the campus. He went down & agreed to play for them. He redshirted his first year but started in his second season & he led the Eagles to a California JUCO Championship in 2012. From there, he was offered a walk on opportunity with the University of Oregon by Chip Kelly. Tyler showed me the letter from OSU. I tried calling Kelly but his ******* secretary refused to put me through to him so we never connected & Tyler never went. He was also being recruited by Texas Tech. The QB Coach came to an Eagles practice to talk to him but that was the last time any coaches from TT spoke with him. Just ghosted him suddenly so they obviously changed their minds. The University of Akron told him he was their guy & wanted him to play in the MAC Conference but... then the entire coaching staff was fired. So, that fell through. The University of California at Pennylvania, then called Cal Penn & now Pennwest also recruited him. Tyler went down for a visit & loved it. At the time, Cal Penn was the top D2 school in the US with a number of players in the past who went on to play in both the CFL & NFL. The coaches wanted him & they offered him an athletic scholarship. He accepted but the coach had to clear one thing first before it became an official written offer. The $40,000 International fee we'd have to pay that was not included in the scholarship offer. The HC said he spoke to the Chancellor of Cal Pen earlier who had agreed to waive the fee. However, when he went to verify that to make sure, he found out the Chancellor changed his mind & said we'd have to pay. My wife & I didn't have a spare $40,000 US lying around so that all fell through. That was so disappointing. I remember Tyler being crushed. What might have been... The only program left that recruited Tyler was Simon Fraser. They knew they were way down the list so they never thought they had any chance of getting Tyler to play at SFU. So, they brought in a qb from the transfer portal who played at Arizona State & NDSU. SFU was his third school in 3 years. When I called HC Dave Johnson checking to see if SFU was still interested, he nearly fell off his chair exclaiming, "I never thought we'd get him!!" However, they already offered a full ride scholarship to the transfer qb & could only offer a half scholarship which Tyler accepted. However, SFU sweetened the deal & by the time he graduated he only had to pay 25% of his tuition & was able to get a student loan. I think they even helped him out with dorm fees as well. He & the kid from Arizona shared qb duties & they battled it out every week for 2 years. A torn hamstring while training in the off season really set Tyler back. He played with the injury his senior year & it really set him back. His senior year was hard dealing with that injury & not being able to run anymore or evading the rush. When he'd go in, he'd get sacked so his playing time was drastically reduced. After he graduated from SFU, he knew his playing days were over. Tyler went into coaching which is what he still does in Seattle today. That's my son's story. His strong arm & athleticism carried him to places where other kids wouldn't have been able to go. You either have it or you don't.5 points -
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
MOBomberFan and 4 others reacted to Mark H. for a post in a topic
5 pointsDayum, can't even have a still anymore.5 points -
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Noeller and 3 others reacted to Bigblue204 for a post in a topic
4 pointsIs Vaccaro a Demski kind of guy....after his 1st contract, he's likely to come home? I know he has a lot of ties to this community.4 points -
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
rebusrankin and 3 others reacted to Mark H. for a post in a topic
4 pointsPure hyperbole man. These things exist in most large cities4 points -
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
bigg jay and 3 others reacted to wbbfan for a post in a topic
4 pointsYeah, it'd be nice if they developed a great dining/pub area nearby. Polo Park isn't what it used to be lol, they dodged a bullet moving away from there. South Kenaston is better shopping now.4 points -
Game 64 : rAnger Management
Game 64 : rAnger Management
kelownabomberfan and 3 others reacted to captaincanuck12 for a post in a topic
4 pointsIt's over. But for some reason my mind always thinks that there's a chance. And I still get mad when they lose and I'm happy when they win. Is it football season yet,?4 points -
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
Stickem and 3 others reacted to SpeedFlex27 for a post in a topic
4 pointsLegalized tailgating. And a governmebnt cash grab. How to take the fun away from a football game.4 points -
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
rebusrankin and 3 others reacted to wbbfan for a post in a topic
4 pointsTalent isn't the primary limiting factor. It's everything that comes after talent that brings success; that's what is lacking. Wilson has plenty of talent. Chase did. Grainger had crazy talent. We get raw talent QBs these days. It takes a lot to polish them if they don't wash out. And a whole lot of them do wash out. This isn't a bombers thing either; this is a league and football-wide issue. Half the starting QBs in the league are closer to pension than to college. More than half, frankly, suck at being a starting QB. The NFL is struggling for QBs, and they've opened wide the maw to vacuum up and hold as many guys as possible. The PR expansions and increases in pay mean we don't get a polished guy with talent anymore. The NIL money makes that problem even worse. Plus, the NFL has diversified in offensive systems along with the college game. No more do we see guys completely ignored because of the offence they ran. Why come up here and, at best, get to play behind a shaky OL (League and sport-wide OLs are struggling as well) and risk a poor quality of life for less money than you make as QB2 at a good program? You always have live and breathe football guys, but the modern generations of football players have far more diverse interests. It's no longer a prerequisite to love football more than a good quality of life. Also, the modern transfer window has hurt a lot of kids' development. Instead of toughing it out and earning a spot after 2 years, they transfer or drop down to juco to try and get a better starting job. The transfer window is fair for the kids, but it isn't an aid in developing QBs. It helps many positions, but not QB imo. Look at Elgersma, a relative unknown to most us scouts until he went pro (compared to us prospects that the scouts have watched since middle school), and he's still getting enough interest to linger on the periphery of the NFL. If he were a Texas/Florida/SoCal, etc. kid who had performed well in junior and high school, we'd never see him. We saw a few years ago Edmonton, Toronto, and Montreal dipped their toes into massive QB pools for camp. Talking 10-ish QBs or more. It failed miserably. What kids with talent need to develop is time and a lot of effort. They also need to have great intangibles, like Dru Browns mental toughness, in order to survive and embrace the grind to step up to qbing at the pro level. It's easily the hardest job in sports. A lot can, and has been said (by myself and others) about the negatives of our scouting and roster management/development strategy. If we see a red flag in the work ethic, ability to uptake the game, passion, or mental toughness of a QB, he is gone.4 points -
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
wbbfan and 3 others reacted to Bigblue204 for a post in a topic
4 pointsAdams and Evans are the only two that make sense really. Decent enough with some potential to unlock still.4 points -
Game 63 : All Your Ducks In A Row
Game 63 : All Your Ducks In A Row
rebusrankin and 3 others reacted to Goalie for a post in a topic
4 pointsDamn near tripled in shots. We are quicker but couple guys noticeably slower are Toews and Nyquist and Arniel plays them way 2 much. Also Iafallo in the top 6 is ridiculous. Lowry 2 center is ridiculous. Rosen looks good but he is too fast for his line mates. Honestly. Just poor roster management by Arniel. Lambert on the 4th. Rosen with 2 slow guys and Iafallo in the top 6 are all stupid coaching decisions. Lowry as 2 center also. Call up Yager. Perfetti Yager Rosen. Just do it you slow vet loving fool.4 points -
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue-urns and 3 others reacted to wbbfan for a post in a topic
4 pointsThing is, cutting at the end of camp is a lot harder to get on with a team like that. Especially with very few nfl snaps. I wonder if the lions look to flip him for a late pick, or as a part of a pick swap. It's an ugly list. Masoli would be a great guy to have around, if he never had to see the field. Tyrie would be a solid pick up. Evans would be servicable for camp. At this point I expect the fa pick up qb to be an ugly move. Unless we manage to work some strange trade before the draft.4 points -
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Tyrie Adams would be the only one I'd kick tires on....pre-injury actually was showing serious potential...2 yrs removed from it now, he could be a under radar kinda signing....and has some experience playing, and looked decent in his start... albeit minimal but he knows a heck a lot more than a fresh faced rookie to the league...and for a QB his age is right in the area where they either figure it out and get pretty good, so a real no risk situation there4 points
-
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Piggy 1 and 3 others reacted to wbbfan for a post in a topic
4 pointsI think I'd rather have him come in next year with the embarrassment of wealth we have on the ol right now. It's a strange time for him to retire as well. You'd hope from a team standpoint that a guy would make it clear before FA starts. I would be surprised if that doesn't accelerate us bringing in another arm now. Maybe 2.4 points -
Former Bombers in NFL (and spring leagues) news
Former Bombers in NFL (and spring leagues) news
Bigblue204 and 3 others reacted to wbbfan for a post in a topic
4 points21 mil, 10 n change guaranteed. Awesome for Dee, very happy to see him secure his future and his families future for a long time.4 points -
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
wbbfan and 2 others reacted to Dr Zaius for a post in a topic
3 points3 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
HardCoreBlue and 2 others reacted to Goalie for a post in a topic
3 pointsYou tell him to tell the other teams he only would play for the bombers or nfl. Wink wink nudge nudge.3 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Bigblue204 and 2 others reacted to GCn20 for a post in a topic
3 pointsI'm keeping Manu. If we really covet Vaccaro that much AND he is not in the NFL, then we find a different way to make it happen. Stud NAT OL are becoming a rare commodity and I wouldn't trade any of them.3 points- 25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
Tracker and 2 others reacted to Mark H. for a post in a topic
3 pointsBlow up all the stadiums, fold the league3 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
wbbfan and 2 others reacted to bigg jay for a post in a topic
3 pointsIf the Bombers really want Vaccaro, they've got to give up something and that might be what it takes. I can't see Vaccaro still being available at 4 when we pick but it's the CFL draft so who knows.3 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Piggy 1 and 2 others reacted to 17to85 for a post in a topic
3 pointsObligatory for Hodge opinions: https://imgur.com/NahG5jB3 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Stickem and 2 others reacted to wbbfan for a post in a topic
3 pointsThe NFL pr pays about 220,000 for less than 2 years of service and 300k for 2 years of service, for the whole year. Plus, a full camp is 10-20k plus any signing bonuses. So you're looking about 230-320k for a full year of camp + Tc. Add on the exchange rate of 35%+, and the taxation level is about half of what you pay up here. Roughly that means you'd have to make about 425k at minimum to compete with a QB who goes through camp and sits on the pr the whole year. At that point, of course, you won't get those guys to give up on that chance and come up here. But that is the ballpark level of competition for rookie QBs. To improve our QB pool, I think you'd need to have rookies able to earn around 200k USD. 175k probably still makes an impact, 150k maybe. Last year, the 2nd tier vet backup QBs (Evans, Shiltz, Strev, etc.) made in the low 100k range. After taxes in American bucks, they are probably lucky if they bring home 60-70k. And you know the raw rookies are making even less than that. Triple that, and push that pay level down to the rookies. Then you'll see guys making the decision to stay in football and come up here who wouldn't otherwise, and see the guys who would come up here do so sooner.3 points- Game 64 : rAnger Management
Game 64 : rAnger Management
captaincanuck12 and 2 others reacted to FrostyWinnipeg for a post in a topic
3 points🕖 1900 📺 TSN3 Last Ten: 4-4-2 @ 5-2-3 Season Series: Tied 0-0 Stats: 26-30-8 @ 26-27-10 Streaks: W2 @ L1 Rangers projected lineup Gabe Perreault -- Mika Zibanejad -- Alexis Lafreniere Adam Edstrom -- Vincent Trocheck -- Will Cuylle Tye Kartye -- Noah Laba – Conor Sheary Jonny Brodzinski -- Juuso Parssinen -- Jaroslav Chmelar Vladislav Gavrikov -- Adam Fox Matthew Robertson -- Braden Schneider Urho Vaakanainen -- Will Borgen Igor Shesterkin Jonathan Quick Scratched: Vincent Iorio, Taylor Raddysh, Brett Berard Injured: Matt Rempe (upper body), J.T. Miller (upper body) Jets projected lineup Kyle Connor -- Mark Scheifele -- Alex Iafallo Cole Perfetti -- Adam Lowry -- Gabriel Vilardi Gustav Nyquist -- Jonathan Toews -- Isak Rosén Cole Koepke -- Morgan Barron -- Brad Lambert Josh Morrissey -- Dylan DeMelo Dylan Samberg -- Elias Salomonsson Haydn Fleury -- Jacob Bryson Connor Hellebuyck Eric Comrie Scratched: Ville Heinola Injured: Nino Niederreiter (knee), Neal Pionk (undisclosed), Colin Miller (knee), Vladislav Namestnikov (lower body) Status Raddysh will miss his third straight game; the forward rejoined the team Wednesday after missing two games because of the death of his father. … Miller was on the ice for the Rangers' morning skate but the forward miss his fifth consecutive game; New York coach Mike Sullivan said, “We’ll cross that bridge when we get to it,” when asked about Miller potentially returning at the Minnesota Wild on Saturday. ... Shesterkin will start after Quick made 21 saves in a 4-0 win against the Calgary Flames on Tuesday. … The Jets will dress the same lineup they used in a 4-1 loss to the Anaheim Ducks on Tuesday.3 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Piggy 1 and 2 others reacted to JuranBoldenRules for a post in a topic
3 pointsThe players playing pro are the best. So someone who is good in NCAA is making a transition up to play pro. So everyone gets excited about a guy who had success at NCAA school(s) but like I said....the talent is relative. They are competing with the best which isn't what they competed against in NCAA. Even if you want to look at a P5 roster you're looking at a fraction of those players making it at all in pro football.3 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Tracker and 2 others reacted to HardCoreBlue for a post in a topic
3 pointsIf we start the season with a qb2 that the head coach and oc have no faith/confidence to have him run the offence if ZC can’t, big fail.3 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Tracker and 2 others reacted to Bigblue204 for a post in a topic
3 pointsI'd bring him in only after TC. If they end up having zero confidence in any of the guys they bring to camp, then sure...go and get him. But otherwise, I think it would be a waste3 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue-urns and 2 others reacted to Stickem for a post in a topic
3 pointsI know a lot of fans are saying that we shouldn't consider MBT...I have qualms about it BUT he seems to be one of the only options we have, to bring in as a back-up in case Zack can't go...IF he can park his 'weird takes' at the door and keep them to himself, he would/could be one of our options...He has a lot of CFL experience and can still sling the rock effectively...With our revamped receiving corps he could be very effective...When we have painted ourselves into a corner like we have in the qb dept. I would say our avenues have become very narrow...3 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
barring some unseen signing....I totally expect it to be ZC...Wilson and Perkins....how they manage the short yardage and who actually comes in with QB2 type packages/plays....yet to be determined, but i'd be shocked if it Is different QB's behind ZC3 points- Former Bombers in NFL (and spring leagues) news
Former Bombers in NFL (and spring leagues) news
Bigblue204 and 2 others reacted to rebusrankin for a post in a topic
3 pointsNice to see Dee get paid.3 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Its already been said Broxton will be RT...Bryant LT this yr....the big question is whats going on at left guard...Does Wallace step up and show he is established there....hopefully so as I would rather us not have 3 import Oline guys as in all honesty, that wouldn't really be a huge impact on the over all team strength. The addition of another impactul DT or DE tho gives our defence way more depth...strength and flexibility...it's the better path to take I am 100 percent certain ELI will be at center, so the notion of a U,S center is kinda out in space dreaming, and really a import there expected to recognize the Canadian game defensive schemes and figure out the blocking....on the fly....no thank you...Maybe if we had a young QB with escapability and not a luandry list of injury concerns or one good shot away from being on the IR for an extended time... sure....not with ZC tho....I can't see Osh rolling those dice The addition of Broxton.....The expunging of Kolo and am certain the advancement in Wallace...we already are significantly better than we were...and deeper....and we have a real O.C who will be able to create schemes with the whole unit3 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Tracker and one other reacted to Noeller for a post in a topic
2 pointsThis could go in either thread but we'll put er here.... Hodge's *ahem * always wildly accurate Mock Draft.....2 points- 25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
wbbfan and one other reacted to WinnipegGordo for a post in a topic
2 pointsThere are restaurants, coffee shops, pubs being being build at the old Southwood golf course. They are part of what is probably the largest current development in the city.2 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
SpeedFlex27 and one other reacted to wbbfan for a post in a topic
2 pointsThats not what is happening, but that leads you to lunch box qbs. Which did not work out well for AFL etc. Pretty much. I know the cost would be a lot. Probably the larger of the last 2 cap increases, if not both of them in size. And that doesnt even include paying starters more money. But as the qb goes, so goes the team, league, and sport.2 points- 25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
BigBlueFanatic and one other reacted to GCn20 for a post in a topic
2 pointsI think it's a matter of both players not playing up to their contracts last year and expecting the same pay day. I'm sure teams inquired on both and didn't like the asking price. Both guys were highly paid last year and were not going to receive that amount again whether in FA or in the second year of a contract. Once the reality sets in no one is ponying up big bucks some guys choose to retire.2 points- 25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
Tracker and one other reacted to wbbfan for a post in a topic
2 pointsIt'll be interesting to see how the turnout goes for the riders. 500 bucks for the year seems like solid value for season ticket holders. But that market is not as spend crazy as it was when they broke their streak. The stadium location for them is awful. (aside from the fact its in Saskatchewan) Having a tailgate spot with a park and ride might not be bad, except for the driver. Makes me glad for where the stadium is now. It was a risky move but once they figured out traffic a bit its been a massive W.2 points- Game 63 : All Your Ducks In A Row
Game 63 : All Your Ducks In A Row
captaincanuck12 and one other reacted to FrostyWinnipeg for a post in a topic
2 points🕢 1930 📺 TSN Last Ten: 7-3-0 @ 5-2-3 Season Series: ANA leads 2-0 Stats: 35-25-3 @ 26-26-10 Streaks: L1 @ W3 Ducks projected lineup Chris Kreider -- Leo Carlsson -- Cutter Gauthier Alex Killorn -- Mikael Granlund -- Beckett Sennecke Mason McTavish -- Ryan Poehling -- Jeffrey Viel Jansen Harkins -- Tim Washe -- Ross Johnston Jackson LaCombe -- Jacob Trouba Olen Zellweger -- Radko Gudas Pavel Mintyukov -- Ian Moore Lukas Dostal Ville Husso Scratched: Drew Helleson, Frank Vatrano Injured: Troy Terry (upper body), John Carlson (lower body) Jets projected lineup Kyle Connor -- Mark Scheifele -- Gabriel Vilardi Cole Perfetti -- Adam Lowry -- Alex Iafallo Gustav Nyquist -- Jonathan Toews -- Isak Rosén Cole Koepke -- Morgan Barron -- Brad Lambert Josh Morrissey -- Dylan DeMelo Dylan Samberg -- Elias Salomonsson Haydn Fleury -- Jacob Bryson Connor Hellebuyck Eric Comrie Scratched: Ville Heinola Injured: Nino Niederreiter (knee), Neal Pionk (undisclosed), Colin Miller (knee), Vladislav Namestnikov (lower body) Status report Carlson "said he’s feeling better,” according to Ducks coach Joel Quenneville, and could make his Anaheim debut toward the end of the Ducks' four-game road trip that ends at the Montreal Canadiens on Sunday; the defenseman was acquired in a trade with the Washington Capitals on Thursday. ... Harkins will enter the lineup, with Vatrano, a forward, coming out. … Defensemen Pionk and Miller are "still a ways away," according to Jets coach Scott Arniel, as are forwards Namestnikov and Niederreiter.2 points- 25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
Noeller and one other reacted to WinnipegGordo for a post in a topic
2 pointsMy understanding is that they intend the tailgaters to use the 2nd stall for their chairs, BBQ etc. So, in actuality there will be room for one vehicle. Its not like in Winnipeg where there are areas for lots of fans to set up on the grass in front of their vehicles.2 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
M.Silverback and one other reacted to GCn20 for a post in a topic
2 pointsIt takes time for most QBs to catch onto our game. You won't succeed with a numbers game. Reps are crucial to learn our game. The problem is that nearly all the QBs brought in league wide have the physical tools to succeed. It really is a matter of picking up our game, intangibles, and the individual QBs drive to succeed in our league. None of that is readily apparent after throwing a few footballs in practice. Some guys (Dominique Davis for eg) look absolutely dynamite in practice but can't get it to translate when the lights are on. Other guys look like hot garbage in practice but are able to to turn that light switch on in games. It is extremely hard to determine what guy will do what. Not to mention, as Brendan Taman used to say, for every guy you get to sign a contract up here there are 9 others that have turned you down. CFL scouts for the most part just pick the guys with the toolbox, and that seem the most enthusiastic to come up here and play.2 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
M.Silverback and one other reacted to GCn20 for a post in a topic
2 pointsWe have 9 teams in this league. QB development is league wide. Maybe one or two legit QBs a year comes thru our entire league loop just because of the small size of our roster availability league wide and the scarcity of legit QBs. We can sit here and bemoan the lack of QB development but hell look around the NFL even, how many teams are developing their own other than teams that were lucky enough to draft franchise guys. Even then. This notion that we must develop our own QB is not the best strategy. Of course, we should try, but really in this league there is absolutely no shame in just signing the most ready guy that hits FA when the time comes. There are only a couple teams in our entire league who are riding QBs they brought in and developed.2 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
One thing in the article made it sound like he got a job coaching QBs at his old college. I'm guessing that's the reason for the odd timing of his retirement.2 points- Game 63 : All Your Ducks In A Row
Game 63 : All Your Ducks In A Row
HardCoreBlue and one other reacted to Goalie for a post in a topic
2 pointsI think that they could sneak in and get wooped by colorabi round 1 but at this point and looking at schedule after rangers game, lots of in division but also good teams. We struggle against good teams. Tough schedule. Hopefully finish bottom 10 and win a top 3 pick. All 3 of stenburg McKenna and verhoff would help eventually.2 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
wbbfan and one other reacted to Pete Catan's Ghost for a post in a topic
2 pointsPull Dane Evans out of retirement. At least he knows our D. (He doesn’t like it…but he knows it.)2 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
wbbfan and one other reacted to Tracker for a post in a topic
2 pointsEvans is a particularly sad case- talented, athletic but too often unable to cope.2 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
wbbfan and one other reacted to Noeller for a post in a topic
2 pointsYa my initial thought on Masoli is the exact same as wbbfan... Love him "around" but not sure if ever want to see him on the field. He's been cooked and done for years now... But I love who he was back in the day and feel like maybe he has something to teach younger QBs. I don't remember Tyrie at all... But honestly at this point I think they're letting Wilson and the UFL guy battle it out for 2.2 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Tracker and one other reacted to BBlink for a post in a topic
2 pointsMasoli wouldn't be my choice but if someone had to come in off the bench and run a CFL offense I think I he could still make plays. But given we still have Wilson I don't think it's that critical. I agree with Tyree Adams being the better fit at this time. If only just to bring him as a camp arm and see if he's recovered.2 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Noeller and one other reacted to rebusrankin for a post in a topic
2 pointsWeird timing by Chase. On Manu, if he gets cut in camp, I bet he tries to latch on elsewhere before looking at the CFL.2 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue-urns and one other reacted to wbbfan for a post in a topic
2 pointsDoesn't make a big difference who is at which T. I think Broxton is likely to stay in the spot, but marty will figure all that out if he hasn't already. Im a big believer in wallace, I hope he continues his trajectory. With a competent Centre, I think the guards will thrive who ever we plug in. The D is going to struggle with the K/KR KIs, likely a DB and if we go with the token Lber. I hope we start griffen and go with a canadian/vaval if he steps up as the back up dbs. Then use a DI on the DL Im pretty confident in Eli. I do have some concerns with his struggles in pass pro at G, but some guys just dont change position well, and he played with an awful C. I also like vibert alot. My primary concern with our OL, is not losing young guys who have shown soo much and have tremendous ceiling. Rando, wallace, and Vanterpool should be long term pieces.2 points- Former Bombers in NFL (and spring leagues) news
Former Bombers in NFL (and spring leagues) news
Bigblue204 and one other reacted to Noeller for a post in a topic
2 points2 points- Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread
Stickem and one other reacted to wbbfan for a post in a topic
2 pointsDon't worry about that, no intelligence of any kind to be found. 😉 The OL glut is as much a concern as it is an asset. We will have to manage that position expertly, or get extremely lucky. I really don't want to lose Rando, Vanterpool, or Wallace. But Bryant is integral to continuity in our OL. This will be the biggest position to watch of camp for me. And a huge success indicator for us. The easiest solution might be to go 4 imps for 1 year. If we go with Broxton, Randolph, Bryant, Vanterpool, and Neufeld, we will likely dominate opposition DLs on talent alone. Basically, as long as Neufeld isnt at T, any alignment could succeed.2 points - Blue Bombers -- 2025/26 Offseason -- Discussion Thread