Saidin Posted October 2, 2017 Report Share Posted October 2, 2017 He did well this last game (Edmonton) Rushing: A. Harris (8 CARS, 54 YDS, 1 TD) Receiving: A. Harris (9 REC, 81 YDS) Did some quick math on what he needs to do the next 5 games. Rushing 793 5 41.4 Passing 718 5 56.4 Think he'll do it? This last game he got a TON of screens (I think we tried at least 5-6 screens in that game) and most of them had big gains. SPuDS and wbbfan 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted October 2, 2017 Report Share Posted October 2, 2017 He'll have to do it in four games because I sure hope we're resting him against Calgary kelownabomberfan and wbbfan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saidin Posted October 2, 2017 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2017 13 minutes ago, Floyd said: He'll have to do it in four games because I sure hope we're resting him against Calgary What I hope is that game is for 1st place Bigblue204, Atomic and Floyd 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigblue204 Posted October 2, 2017 Report Share Posted October 2, 2017 17 minutes ago, Floyd said: He'll have to do it in four games because I sure hope we're resting him against Calgary That game will be for 1st place!!! Atomic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark H. Posted October 2, 2017 Report Share Posted October 2, 2017 If Harris gets 1000/1000 then we better have the MOP and the Most Outstanding OL. Atomic, wbbfan, blue_gold_84 and 3 others 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted October 2, 2017 Report Share Posted October 2, 2017 32 minutes ago, Mark H. said: If Harris gets 1000/1000 then we better have the MOP and the Most Outstanding OL. I think the problem becomes choosing one OL out of that whole crew......but I agree that whoever the OL is that gets chosen by the local reporters, that person better win league MO OL if Andrew hits 1k/1k... Mark H. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bomber_fanaddict Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 This is really going to come down to our next 5 opponents. I believe he can hit over 1K rushing pretty easy the receiving will be much more of a task. We have: Ham BC x2 Tor Cal He should have some good stats at home against Hamilton (I'll predict 80yr rushing and 50yr passing) Tor has a pretty solid D and might not allow a lot of rushing yards so say he only goes 50 rushing and 40 passing. BC might give up some big numbers as well. If he can average 60yrds rushing and 40 passing each game for a total of 120/80. Leaving Calgary who doesn't like to give up a lot of either! I think he finishes around 1,050 rushing and about 900 receiving. Which is still pretty incredible concidering they are using a 2 back system! Atomic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tehedra Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 Sadly had he not dropped that ball from our backup QB the other day he would have even more receiving yards; he actually has a couple drops he wishes he could have back that would have stacked up his receiving yards All he needs to do is break one for an 80 yard touch down scamper and then the target will become really easy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taynted_Fayth Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 5 hours ago, Noeller said: I think the problem becomes choosing one OL out of that whole crew......but I agree that whoever the OL is that gets chosen by the local reporters, that person better win league MO OL if Andrew hits 1k/1k... At this point I want to give to Hardrick, the guy has become the heart of the team Noeller 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearpants Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 15 hours ago, Floyd said: He'll have to do it in four games because I sure hope we're resting him against Calgary I agree with you... but if he walks into that game at 985/955 (or whatever)... there's no chance he's sitting.... SPuDS and Noeller 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearpants Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 9 hours ago, Taynted_Fayth said: At this point I want to give to Hardrick, the guy has become the heart of the team I'm always tempted to lean towards Stan Bryant when the conversation of "who's the best O-lineman" shows up... he's the anchor of the line, he leads with his play... and how often is Nichols pressured from the blind side? SPuDS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomic Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 9 minutes ago, bearpants said: I'm always tempted to lean towards Stan Bryant when the conversation of "who's the best O-lineman" shows up... he's the anchor of the line, he leads with his play... and how often is Nichols pressured from the blind side? Agreed. Bryant is incredibly consistent... he would get my vote. SPuDS and Tracker 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 For me, it's a toss up between Bryant and Bond....but Hardrick should get some love, too... blue_gold_84, SPuDS and MOBomberFan 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBBFanWest Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 I love the fact that we need to have a discussion about who would be our most outstanding O lineman versus "would any of our O line start with any other team"! blue_gold_84, SPuDS, Noeller and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracker Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 Just now, WBBFanWest said: I love the fact that we need to have a discussion about who would be our most outstanding O lineman versus "would any of our O line start with any other team"! Yet, its amazing that we have the third best O-line as judged by the number of sacks given up. I can't recall who the better ones are for sure, but I think it was Calgary and (WTF?) Edmonton. SPuDS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 11 minutes ago, tracker said: Yet, its amazing that we have the third best O-line as judged by the number of sacks given up. I can't recall who the better ones are for sure, but I think it was Calgary and (WTF?) Edmonton. Sacks aren't all about the OL...... SPuDS and blue_gold_84 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracker Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 Just now, Noeller said: Sacks aren't all about the OL...... No individual stat is, and that is why I qualified my statement, but its a good rough indicator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 Just now, tracker said: No individual stat is, and that is why I qualified my statement, but its a good rough indicator. I dunno, I think Harris's success is as good or better indicator.... SPuDS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweep the leg Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 17 minutes ago, tracker said: Yet, its amazing that we have the third best O-line as judged by the number of sacks given up. I can't recall who the better ones are for sure, but I think it was Calgary and (WTF?) Edmonton. We're number 1 in fewest pressures allowed. blue_gold_84, BigBlueFanatic and SPuDS 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 Edmonton giving up few sacks makes sense given how elusive Reilly is. What are the pressures given up by Edmonton? Cause that to me would tell a better story. I don't think their OL is all that spectacular, they just got a qb that can get away. SPuDS, blue_gold_84 and MOBomberFan 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue_gold_84 Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 12 minutes ago, Noeller said: I dunno, I think Harris's success is as good or better indicator.... His, Flanders', and especially Nichols' passing. Noeller 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booch Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 yeah the sacks allowed is a deceiving stat...pressures allowed is more of an indicator. Some of the sacks allowed are a result of Nicholls not trying to force a throw into double/triple coverage or just toss up something when he shouldn't be and risking giving up a pick. It's a result of a smart QB not turning the ball over and taking that sack if he cant just throw it away...and I am o.k with that as we keep possession of the ball. Also we lead the league in rushing yards per game on top of the least pressures allowed, so that tells you where our line is at...top of the league Noeller, blue_gold_84, Mark F and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpan85 Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 I bet if you ask the guys on the Oline who has played the best this year they will say Goosen. Sard, SPuDS and Noeller 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wideleft Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 (edited) I have him as 70 yards ahead of pace on rushing and 4 yards behind pace in receiving (assuming a 55.6 yard average per game over 18 games). Edited October 3, 2017 by Wideleft SPuDS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildPath Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 4 hours ago, 17to85 said: Edmonton giving up few sacks makes sense given how elusive Reilly is. What are the pressures given up by Edmonton? Cause that to me would tell a better story. I don't think their OL is all that spectacular, they just got a qb that can get away. Is it just me or has Nichols looked more elusive as well the last 2 games or so? Seems like he never used to find his way out of pressure, but I noticed a few plays where he showed some escapability lately. And I mean that separate from ability to run the football. SPuDS, blitzmore and Sard 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now