rebusrankin Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 I wonder if any teams have made an offer to Bailey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbbfan Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 7 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: I wonder if any teams have made an offer to Bailey. My bet is they are all waiting to see if he sits long enough to take some thing with in 10k of min. 3 hours ago, Rich said: I've split out the discussion on Winnipeg and urban decay to this topic Rip topic. But atleast thread is back on the rails lol. we need to sign some one before we get into civic planning and walkable cities. I’ll never find my way out of that rabbet hole. with white gone I wonder if baileys market is gonna move up now. Is any one still missing a no2 imp wr? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpan85 Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 wbbfan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 23 minutes ago, Jpan85 said: A fair deal and another example of why Schoen/Lawler are likely to cost less next year Jesse, Bigblue204 and rebusrankin 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinnipegGordo Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 (edited) 6 hours ago, Jpan85 said: So this 12k promo money is from a seperate fund that teams pay players for appearances etc. Teams need to spend atleast 110k but there is No maximum for this fund. Yet another CFL policy that fans are left in the dark on. What would prevent the Bombers from paying Brandy 100k for player appearances and allocate part of his salary to someone else? Edited February 21 by WinnipegGordo Geebrr and wbbfan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geebrr Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 Just now, WinnipegGordo said: So this 12k promo money is from a seperate fund that teams pay players for appearances etc. Teams need to spend atleast 110k but there is maximum for this fund. Yet another CFL policy that fans are left in the dark on. What would prevent the Bombers from paying Brandy 100k for player appearances and allocate part of his salary to someone else? Trust me , we use it. wbbfan, Noeller and JohnnyAbonny 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinnipegGordo Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 1 minute ago, Geebrr said: Trust me , we use it. I dont doubt it but it hasnt been mentioned in player compensation before now. rebusrankin, wbbfan and Geebrr 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedFlex27 Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 13 minutes ago, WinnipegGordo said: So this 12k promo money is from a seperate fund that teams pay players for appearances etc. Teams need to spend atleast 110k but there is maximum for this fund. Yet another CFL policy that fans are left in the dark on. What would prevent the Bombers from paying Brandy 100k for player appearances and allocate part of his salary to someone else? The sailors say Brandy.... JCon and JohnnyAbonny 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GCn20 Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 14 minutes ago, Geebrr said: Trust me , we use it. Barker said using this to circumvent the cap is becoming the CFLs dirty little secret. WinnipegGordo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebusrankin Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 So looking at White's deal is it possible, both Lawler+Schoen are at $200,000-225,000 or so? In otherwords, $400,000-$450,000 instead of $515,000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted February 21 Author Report Share Posted February 21 Fwiw, Dunk said yesterday that the White deal totals 265/year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinnipegGordo Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 2 hours ago, GCn20 said: Barker said using this to circumvent the cap is becoming the CFLs dirty little secret. The way I read into it is the Bombers shud be able to retain any player they want to bring back - unless its a player like Hardrick who got a large pay increase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bb1 Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 "Sigh" it would not surprise me if there are teams in the CFL that are shooting themselves in the foot. How do you justify a cap to the players if you circumvent it? Will they ever learn? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCon Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 So, it's a soft cap now? This is bizarre. Somewhere in Regina, they're filling houses with bunk beds. We're back in business baby! GCJenks, MOBomberFan, WinnipegGordo and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty Liver Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 49 minutes ago, bb1 said: "Sigh" it would not surprise me if there are teams in the CFL that are shooting themselves in the foot. How do you justify a cap to the players if you circumvent it? Will they ever learn? Expect billionaires like Larry Tanenbaum or Murray Edwards to complain they can't compete with clubs from smaller markets, and this loop-hole will be shut down within a season or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelownabomberfan Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 46 minutes ago, JCon said: So, it's a soft cap now? This is bizarre. Somewhere in Regina, they're filling houses with bunk beds. We're back in business baby! They'd never think to add a functioning indoor bathroom. GCJenks, bb1 and JCon 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelownabomberfan Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 4 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said: The sailors say Brandy.... bluto 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBlue Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 On 2024-02-19 at 11:22 PM, SpeedFlex27 said: I don't agree. The GC is finished by mid November. The weather isn't as cold as it used to be. Teams can still pass the ball without having to to rely on a grinding ground game on a frozen field anymore, although it doesn't hurt. Pass - Run: who cares November games hurt attendance and weaken the whole league ... many fans stay home when they would attend in May MOVE THE GC TO THE 1ST SUNDAY IN NOVEMBER Noeller, Bigblue204 and wpgallday1960 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedFlex27 Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 1 hour ago, BigBlue said: Pass - Run: who cares November games hurt attendance and weaken the whole league ... many fans stay home when they would attend in May MOVE THE GC TO THE 1ST SUNDAY IN NOVEMBER What a weeny. Why not have the CFL merge with the UFL & play games in April? Have the championship in July? With fans like you that are afraid of a little cold that'll be the ultimate future of our league. Four down spring football will be all that's left. You can sit thru the spring snowstorms or the miserable drawn out cold springs. JohnnyAbonny and rebusrankin 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedFlex27 Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 7 hours ago, GCn20 said: Barker said using this to circumvent the cap is becoming the CFLs dirty little secret. Time for Woodward & Bernstein to do their work. wpgallday1960 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyAbonny Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 (edited) 8 hours ago, BigBlue said: Pass - Run: who cares November games hurt attendance and weaken the whole league ... many fans stay home when they would attend in May MOVE THE GC TO THE 1ST SUNDAY IN NOVEMBER Nah, it’s fine the way it is. I’d even be ok with the playoffs in December like way back when. I mean, I’m in the minority I guess but I love cold weather football. Nothing more Canadian than a 3pm start ending under the lights with snowflakes falling. Not to mention avoiding the weekly lightning delays that come with late spring/early summer games. Edited February 21 by JohnnyAbonny Bigblue204, Jesse, Noeller and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HardCoreBlue Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 1 hour ago, JohnnyAbonny said: Nah, it’s fine the way it is. I’d even be ok with the playoffs in December like way back when. I mean, I’m in the minority I guess but I love cold weather football. Nothing more Canadian than a 3pm start ending under the lights with snowflakes falling. Not to mention avoiding the weekly lightning delays that come with late spring/early summer games. Yup and a lot of football players would agree (at least the ones used to a cold climate) but also hate hate hate when extreme weather becomes the focal point minimizing how the highly skilled players can play. Pros and cons for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GCn20 Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 13 hours ago, WinnipegGordo said: The way I read into it is the Bombers shud be able to retain any player they want to bring back - unless its a player like Hardrick who got a large pay increase. Well it was mentioned that the reason we got Streveler so cheap was that he could earn a lot of money off the field in Winnipeg. I wonder if we threw him a bunch of 'promo" money? Jesse, Bigblue204 and Piggy 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 I've always assumed that lots of players had back room deals with local companies... I.E. Take a smaller salary on the books with the club.... meanwhile Adam Bighill gets paid an additional large amount of money from his "part time" job in the city. Bigblue204 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuranBoldenRules Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 13 hours ago, JCon said: So, it's a soft cap now? This is bizarre. Somewhere in Regina, they're filling houses with bunk beds. We're back in business baby! It always has been a soft cap. There's consequences for spending over the limit. In hard capped leagues they literally start waiving players off the roster to make the team compliant if they are over (like the NHL). Noeller, Piggy 1, Bigblue204 and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now