kelownabomberfan Posted September 7, 2019 Report Share Posted September 7, 2019 2 hours ago, Tracker said: You can thank Myron Baloney for that. He ordered CBC to divest itself of all professional and especially popular sports telecasting so as to not compete with private broadcasters. Who is Myron Baloney? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFL_on_CBC CBC was broadcasting CFL up until 2007. I really liked Khari Jones as a color guy when he worked with old Steve. wbbfan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty Liver Posted September 7, 2019 Report Share Posted September 7, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, kelownabomberfan said: Who is Myron Baloney? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFL_on_CBC CBC was broadcasting CFL up until 2007. I really liked Khari Jones as a color guy when he worked with old Steve. Better known as Lyin' Brian. Edited September 7, 2019 by Throw Long Bannatyne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelownabomberfan Posted September 7, 2019 Report Share Posted September 7, 2019 40 minutes ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said: Better know as Lyin' Brian. He wasnt PM in 2007. Might as well blame Lester Pearson too. SpeedFlex27 and AB BomberFan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbbfan Posted September 7, 2019 Report Share Posted September 7, 2019 4 hours ago, kelownabomberfan said: Who is Myron Baloney? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFL_on_CBC CBC was broadcasting CFL up until 2007. I really liked Khari Jones as a color guy when he worked with old Steve. Walby was great too. And imo when sports net had CFL games they had the best camera work. Tracker and Mark H. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geebrr Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 On 2019-09-06 at 4:08 PM, Geebrr said: 43? They won't go over 10 👀 BigBlueFanatic, Noeller, Bomber_fanaddict and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigseye Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 On 2019-09-06 at 3:35 PM, Ripper said: You guys are funny, Whipped? Maybe, but I doubt it and I know you do too. I am a stats guy, obviously you are the not worst statistically, so I knew that before I posted. Was just replying to a post. But here is a stat, you have given up 1000 more yards in the air than us and we like to throw the ball. If Fajardo goes over 300 again, we will win, simple as that. It will be a good game, looking forward to it Whipped, with a capital W and there was never any doubt in my mind. Your team is soft and got physically beat down. NorthernSkunk, wbbfan and Bigblue204 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bomber_fanaddict Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 39 minutes ago, pigseye said: Whipped, with a capital W and there was never any doubt in my mind. Your team is soft and got physically beat down. It's a good thing Fajardo didnt get 104 more yards or they would have won! Whew.. Geebrr and wbbfan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripper Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 7 hours ago, pigseye said: Whipped, with a capital W and there was never any doubt in my mind. Your team is soft and got physically beat down. Good thing I said maybe. Sure didn't see that coming. Is what it is. Congrats on the win, nice to go into a bye week on a positive note. For us, need a win in Montreal I guess Wanna-B-Fanboy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripper Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 7 hours ago, Bomber_fanaddict said: It's a good thing Fajardo didnt get 104 more yards or they would have won! Whew.. Do you need it explained to you? If a team that likes to pass a lot gets to pass, they will be successful. See what I mean? Or a team that run a lot, like you, doesn't get to run, they won't. I should have maybe said if you guys don't rush for a certain amount you will lose. You probably wouldn't have understood that either. NVM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracker Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 14 minutes ago, Ripper said: Good thing I said maybe. Sure didn't see that coming. Is what it is. Congrats on the win, nice to go into a bye week on a positive note. For us, need a win in Montreal I guess This is not your father's Alouettes any longer. The Als may still be a bit short on talent, but Khari has them believing they can win again. I would pick them to beat the Riders. Mark F, M.O.A.B. and Sard 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geebrr Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 Probably should have saw it coming because we've been telling you repeatedly. Noeller, blue_gold_84 and Nash00 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedFlex27 Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 39 minutes ago, Ripper said: Do you need it explained to you? If a team that likes to pass a lot gets to pass, they will be successful. See what I mean? Or a team that run a lot, like you, doesn't get to run, they won't. I should have maybe said if you guys don't rush for a certain amount you will lose. You probably wouldn't have understood that either. NVM. You couldn't run or pass. Your team got its ass kicked. Noeller, Deiter Fan, blue_gold_84 and 3 others 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bomber_fanaddict Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 45 minutes ago, Ripper said: Do you need it explained to you? If a team that likes to pass a lot gets to pass, they will be successful. See what I mean? Or a team that run a lot, like you, doesn't get to run, they won't. I should have maybe said if you guys don't rush for a certain amount you will lose. You probably wouldn't have understood that either. NVM. Lol. No explanation needed. You said if he passed for 300 you win. Even if he threw for 400 you guys still wouldnt have won that game. Deiter Fan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 55 minutes ago, Ripper said: Do you need it explained to you? If a team that likes to pass a lot gets to pass, they will be successful. See what I mean? Or a team that run a lot, like you, doesn't get to run, they won't. I should have maybe said if you guys don't rush for a certain amount you will lose. You probably wouldn't have understood that either. NVM. well we tried to explain to you that your team was overrated and Labour day was lucky for them, but no you didn't believe that an ass kicking was coming. Go lick your wounds and stop pretending you know anything. Mark F 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinnipegGordo Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 47 minutes ago, Tracker said: This is not your father's Alouettes any longer. The Als may still be a bit short on talent, but Khari has them believing they can win again. I would pick them to beat the Riders. Yeah, the Riders were fortunate that Adams was out with a concussion when they played a few weeks back. rebusrankin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, WinnipegGordo said: Yeah, the Riders were fortunate that Adams was out with a concussion when they played a few weeks back. and that they only had to play 3 quarters. Riders have had the most fortunate schedule going. They got Hamilton the first game Evans had to start for them and Banks was out for that game too. and they get the great fortune of having BC on the schedule 3 times this year, and not playing Edmonton until the end of the season. Total cupcake schedule for them. Deiter Fan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geebrr Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, WinnipegGordo said: Yeah, the Riders were fortunate that Adams was out with a concussion when they played a few weeks back. And I think Stanback was out. And if course the game was called in the 3rd Q Wanna-B-Fanboy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted September 8, 2019 Report Share Posted September 8, 2019 (edited) 56 minutes ago, Tracker said: This is not your father's Alouettes any longer. The Als may still be a bit short on talent, but Khari has them believing they can win again. I would pick them to beat the Riders. To be honest- I am a little worried about the Als, they look to be much improved and will be making lots of noise down the stretch. I would place the teams: - Winnipeg -Calgary -Edmonton -Hamilton -Montreal -riders -Argos -ALLCAPS -Lions Edited September 9, 2019 by wanna-b-fanboy Bigblue204 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BomberBall Posted September 9, 2019 Report Share Posted September 9, 2019 Any chance this thread will get back to actual Bomber news? You know, transactions, injures, etc.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedFlex27 Posted September 9, 2019 Report Share Posted September 9, 2019 28 minutes ago, BomberBall said: Any chance this thread will get back to actual Bomber news? You know, transactions, injures, etc.? Why? Slagging the Riders is too much fun. blue_gold_84, 17to85, Albertabomberguy and 2 others 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuranBoldenRules Posted September 9, 2019 Report Share Posted September 9, 2019 1 hour ago, wanna-b-fanboy said: To be honest- I am a little worried about the Als, they look to be much improved and will be making lots of noise down the stretch. I would place the teams: - Winnipeg -Calgary -Edmonton -Hamilton -Montreal -riders -Argos -ALLCAPS -Lions Edmonton is a distant 6th and really lucky they had an easy schedule to start (like getting the Als week 1 with the chaos and Pipkin) because the way the Argos are trending they’ll be better than them soon too. Edmonton is terrible...not even competitive against any good teams. Bigblue204 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted September 9, 2019 Report Share Posted September 9, 2019 I really think Edmonton’s problems stem from an undisciplined coach Harris and Maas are a good oc/QBs combo but I can’t see them clicking as a coach/qb either wbbfan and Bigblue204 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthernSkunk Posted September 9, 2019 Report Share Posted September 9, 2019 3 hours ago, Ripper said: Do you need it explained to you? If a team that likes to pass a lot gets to pass, they will be successful. See what I mean? Or a team that run a lot, like you, doesn't get to run, they won't. I should have maybe said if you guys don't rush for a certain amount you will lose. You probably wouldn't have understood that either. NVM. I had to listen to the game on the radio...... would you say the refs called a fair game ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deiter Fan Posted September 9, 2019 Report Share Posted September 9, 2019 On 2019-09-06 at 3:35 PM, Ripper said: If Fajardo goes over 300 again, we will win, simple as that. 4 hours ago, Ripper said: Good thing I said maybe. Geebrr, GCJenks, Bigblue204 and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booch Posted September 9, 2019 Report Share Posted September 9, 2019 Just now, Deiter Fan said: Ooops lol GCJenks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now