do or die Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 Fighting through adversity, and making things happen in the key moments. ...is closer to my idea of being mentally tough wpgallday1960 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 I like MO but he was invisible until he moved to LB. Dude didn't show up early in the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 Wasn't Picard the loud mean guy we brought in to add toughness.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
do or die Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 .....and to block people.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon37 Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 The defence crapped the bed just as much as the offence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty Liver Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 .....and to block people.... Oh right, that too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
do or die Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 ...and to shotgun snap.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 The defence crapped the bed just as much as the offence. Would disagree strongly with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 Defense is fine... add a great DT and DE and it will be a dominant unit. Offence continues to be the problem year in year out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 The defence crapped the bed just as much as the offence. Would disagree strongly with that. Of course you would, you are capable of rational thought. The defence wasn't perfect but they were better than the offence by very large amounts. The offence was quite frankly an embarrassment. bearpants and Tracker 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IC Khari Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 Offensively we thought we had something after the first game but came to realize it was the Riders ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 Offensively we thought we had something after the first game but came to realize it was the Riders ...Came to realize there's a massive drop off after Drew Willy. Offense showed great things under Willy other times (Calgary) as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 You could argue the defense bent and broke at times we would've liked them to have not. Obviously. But let's also factor in how long they were on the field in certain situations. How many times they made a stop only to have the O put them right back on the field. We need a few players (a DT, a DE and maybe a guy to replace Demond) but other than that our D is VERY solid. They just need to get a little more time on the sidelines courtesy of our offense. The offense is atrocious and even with Drew Willy, we were hindered. Bellefeuille was a terrible OC during his time here and I'm glad to see him gone. bigg jay 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBURGESS Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 The defence was better than the offence, but that doesn't make it good. We were 8th in Points allowed, TOP against and Net Offense against, which is horrible. We were 6th is points against which tells me that our bend don't break worked, but not really that well. I get that a lot of folks want to just blame the offense for our defenses problems, but we gave up tons of yards in first halfs and that's before they were tired. Quite frankly, our defence couldn't get the opposition off the field quickly enough most of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigg jay Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 You could argue the defense bent and broke at times we would've liked them to have not. Obviously. But let's also factor in how long they were on the field in certain situations. How many times they made a stop only to have the O put them right back on the field. We need a few players (a DT, a DE and maybe a guy to replace Demond) but other than that our D is VERY solid. They just need to get a little more time on the sidelines courtesy of our offense. The offense is atrocious and even with Drew Willy, we were hindered. Bellefeuille was a terrible OC during his time here and I'm glad to see him gone. I was just about to mention this. Any defense that is on the field as much as ours was, is going to give up yards & points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 If our O had progressed like the D did this season, as it went along, we would've been outstanding by the final third of the year. Took the D awhile to get going but once they did, they looked good. As mentioned, just spent way too much time on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBURGESS Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 The oppositions time of possession was 31:58. Those 2 minutes aren't the difference between being good and being worn down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
do or die Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 Need 2 D Linemen... and 1 or two cover guys in the D backfield. .. pigseye 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.O.A.B. Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 How much can we also factor in the adjustment from an orthodox style D of Etcheverri to a more coventional D of Hall ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voodoochylde Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 The oppositions time of possession was 31:58. Those 2 minutes aren't the difference between being good and being worn down. It's all about where and how those minutes are logged. The offense comes out of the gate flat and leaves the defense on the field for 20 minutes of the first half, do you not think that has an impact on the rest of the game? Granted it's not always as simple as saying that the offense failed to sustain drives .. there were times where the defense simply couldn't get off the field .. but the defensive side of the ball was capable of making adjustments as the game went on .. and at least gave the team a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBURGESS Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 The oppositions time of possession was 31:58. Those 2 minutes aren't the difference between being good and being worn down. It's all about where and how those minutes are logged. The offense comes out of the gate flat and leaves the defense on the field for 20 minutes of the first half, do you not think that has an impact on the rest of the game? Granted it's not always as simple as saying that the offense failed to sustain drives .. there were times where the defense simply couldn't get off the field .. but the defensive side of the ball was capable of making adjustments as the game went on .. and at least gave the team a chance. Sure the lack of offense is a contributing factor, but the defense came out flat a bunch of the time too and gave up tons of yards in the first half. The second half defensive adjustments in the last 3rd of the season were good. No doubt about it. Still doesn't turn a 7th or 8th ranked defense into a good one. pigseye 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 The D might have come out slowly in some games, but they adjusted and got better and gave the team plenty of chances. Sometimes you need your offence to take some heat off of them and that includes scoring your way out of troubles. Basically if the D wasn't phenomenal the team was in a big hole because the offence wasn't able to string any drives together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracker Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 You could argue the defense bent and broke at times we would've liked them to have not. Obviously. But let's also factor in how long they were on the field in certain situations. How many times they made a stop only to have the O put them right back on the field. We need a few players (a DT, a DE and maybe a guy to replace Demond) but other than that our D is VERY solid. They just need to get a little more time on the sidelines courtesy of our offense. The offense is atrocious and even with Drew Willy, we were hindered. Bellefeuille was a terrible OC during his time here and I'm glad to see him gone. I was just about to mention this. Any defense that is on the field as much as ours was, is going to give up yards & points. We were also saddled with a poor D-line which had little pass rush and a middle linebacker who seemed lost most of the time, particularly against the run when the opposition was running the ball to eat up the clock. pigseye 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 It's not about the defence being tired as much as it is the defence, after 2 minutes, having to go back on the field. When the offence is a two-and-outer, it sure as hell works in the opposing team's favour to get right back on the field and build the momentum. Tell me what offence doesn't like being out there more and more when the other team can't move the ball? Another chance they say? Great! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 It's not about the defence being tired as much as it is the defence, after 2 minutes, having to go back on the field. When the offence is a two-and-outer, it sure as hell works in the opposing team's favour to get right back on the field and build the momentum. Tell me what offence doesn't like being out there more and more when the other team can't move the ball? Another chance they say? Great! plus you get into the whole lopsided field position game which takes it toll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now