Got some healthy bodies back and maybe a surprise or two may be back (Houston),CANT ******* WAIT!!!!!!!!!!

21 minutes ago, blue_gold_84 said:

Now we wait for a status update on Collaros.

Ugh, that was a crazy game.

Trainers work your magic.

2 minutes ago, Geebrr said:

That game was not that ******* close.

**** BC and **** Toronto 

BF did ******* nothing.

7 points because grant muffed a punt, 3 point swing based on missed extra points... yeah this game was never in doubt 

1 minute ago, BomberfanMKS said:

It's funny... Calgary outsmarted themselves not using their running game to "trick" BCs D.

Winnipeg.... yeh we're just gonna ram the ball down their throats like we always do... stop us

That one TD drive was basically the Bombers saying "ok, stop us *******..."

2 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

7 points because grant muffed a punt, 3 point swing based on missed extra points... yeah this game was never in doubt 

Also 2 missed Converts and one returned for 2pts. That’s 5pts right there. Shouldn’t have been that close. 

Edited November 14, 20223 yr by Bomber_fanaddict

one of the differences cfl... v Nfl is game coverage.

NFL the national broadcasts are pretty unbiased. 

tsn is like watching, or  listening to an NFL home team broadcast. like listening to Vikings radio the fan, minneapolis, play by play broadcast of a vikings game.

just awful. so amateurish. like the Dan Clark outburst a few weeks ago. 

I just turn off the sound. 

question... was the roughing the kicker call correct?

 

Edited November 14, 20223 yr by Mark F

4 minutes ago, Mark F said:

one of the differences cfl... v Nfl is game coverage.

NFL the national broadcasts are pretty unbiased. 

tsn is like watching, or  listening to an NFL home team broadcast. like listening to Vikings radio the fan, minneapolis, play by play broadcast of a vikings game.

just awful. so amateurish. like the Dan Clark outburst a few weeks ago. 

I just turn off the sound. 

 

Dan Clark would have won this game for BC.

Just now, captaincanuck12 said:

Dan Clark would have won this game for BC.

at QB !

2 minutes ago, captaincanuck12 said:

Dan Clark would have won this game for BC.

Dan clarke is the cfl

2 minutes ago, Booch said:

Dan clarke is the cfl

If we can just get Dan Clarke as a FA we’ll never lose again

That RTK was ******* bullshit

Nice try CFL

Ram this Cup down your throat 

1 minute ago, Geebrr said:

That RTK was ******* bullshit

Nice try CFL

Ram this Cup down your throat 

What was the ruling on that? I heard you can’t hit the kickers plant foot even if you block the ball first? Is that true? First I’ve heard that. I thought if you hit the ball first the kicker was fair game. Sorry if this was discussed early!

Just now, Bomber_fanaddict said:

What was the ruling on that? I heard you can’t hit the kickers plant foot even if you block the ball first? Is that true? First I’ve heard that. I thought if you hit the ball first the kicker was fair game. Sorry if this was discussed early!

Making **** up on the fly , never seen it . 
 

Bullshit 

O’Shea said it was a penalty and an intentional rule change to protect the kicker.

Two words I don't want to hear this week "walking boot"

Edited November 14, 20223 yr by bustamente

2 minutes ago, Bomber_fanaddict said:

What was the ruling on that? I heard you can’t hit the kickers plant foot even if you block the ball first? Is that true? First I’ve heard that. I thought if you hit the ball first the kicker was fair game. Sorry if this was discussed early!

According the TSN broadcast doesn’t matter if the kick is blocked, if you hit the plant leg it is roughing the kicker (player safety issue).

2 minutes ago, voodoochylde said:

O’Shea said it was a penalty and an intentional rule change to protect the kicker.

Weird. But it is what it is I suppose.

1 minute ago, bustamente said:

Two words I don't want to here this week "walking boot"

Grant’s going to break so many ankles during the GC that the Argos are going to have guys leaving in a walking boot. 

9 minutes ago, Geebrr said:

That RTK was ******* bullshit

Nice try CFL

Ram this Cup down your throat 

All turnovers and touchdowns are reviewed by CC but man they suck at consistency with their calls even with the benefit of super slow mo and multiple angles.

25 minutes ago, Bomber_fanaddict said:

Also 2 missed Converts and one returned for 2pts. That’s 5pts right there. Shouldn’t have been that close. 

Also int in the end zone on a lame duck throw from Zach... lots of points left on the table that could of made our lead far larger. 

14 minutes ago, voodoochylde said:

O’Shea said it was a penalty and an intentional rule change to protect the kicker.

Whatever 

bullshit 

he is being nice 

 BTW  don’t get it twisted : this BC team is not young  or coming up.

Tried to buy a Cup in FA

BC sucks

Edited November 14, 20223 yr by Geebrr

10 minutes ago, wpgallday1960 said:

According the TSN broadcast doesn’t matter if the kick is blocked, if you hit the plant leg it is roughing the kicker (player safety issue).

Absolutely but then we need CC to swoop in when any call is missed when it comes to player safety. That’s my issue.

31 minutes ago, Bomber_fanaddict said:

Also 2 missed Converts and one returned for 2pts. That’s 5pts right there. Shouldn’t have been that close. 

How is that 5?

4 minutes ago, bryan35 said:

How is that 5?

Ah Rider math.

We also beat the command centre. **** the command centre and the horse they road in on. 

7 minutes ago, BaconNBigBlue said:

We also beat the command centre. **** the command centre and the horse they road in on. 

Refs put up a better fight than the lions did. 
 

https://3downnation.com/2022/11/13/winnipeg-blue-bombers-advance-to-third-straight-grey-cup-but-lose-zach-collaros-to-injury/

 

it begins. They expect us to sit zach cus we shut down roarke or meowke