Super Duper Negatron
-
Posts
3,672 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Posts posted by Super Duper Negatron
-
-
-
-
-
-
This argument is dumb.
Besides, Enjoyment = Result - Expectations. By my math, high expectations means you are all robbing yourselves of enjoyment.
-
It's a gift and a curse. Actually not so much a gift as a birth defect...
-
5 minutes ago, Goalie said:
Oh boy.. Just read up on it... How is he allowed to cross the border even?
Likely because he wasn't ever personally charged/convicted.
- SPuDS and blue_gold_84
-
2
-
6 minutes ago, Goalie said:
So... He knew about stuff but didnt report it? Or he participated in it? Cuz if its the first one... Thats a tough situation... Im sure we have all seen illegal things and never reported them... Thats a tough one. If he participated in it... **** off and die.
I dunno tho. Not sure he should be allowed here either way. But to anyone saying there's no difference between not repirting it and doing it himself... Umm yeah there is.
You need to read up on what actually happened. This isn't like noticing someone swipe an Eat More from a Husky station. He was alleged to be complicit in a cover up of what was a pretty serious sexual assault problem among the athletes that he was responsible for.
-
54 minutes ago, Gotmilt said:
you have to open the link to a different tweet.
Yeah, I get that, but saying "none of my business" is super weak, especially given the collective response of his peers in the media.
- SPuDS and blue_gold_84
-
1
-
1
-
-
Dinwiddie absolved. I now blame those uniforms.
-
31 minutes ago, bearpants said:
challenges definitely existed in 07... I specifically remember Austin challenging a spot and they actually won it... then Berry took a stupid delay of game penalty buy "challenging the challenge" ... I don't recall the circumstances of this particular INT, whether we were out of challenges or didn't throw the flag in time, or didn't notice, etc...
All turnovers are reviewed automatically now, though, which would have helped.
-
Unfortunately, with the way the Riders are playing, combined with the Labour Day factor, I think the Bombers getting wrecked on Sunday is a near certainty. I would put my money on a Rider blowout Sunday, and a Bomber squeaker in the Banjo Bowl. The Riders defence is good enough to keep it close in the latter, and the Bombers defence bad enough to get destroyed in the former.
-
8 minutes ago, Atomic said:
He could have got that first down easy if he had just run. Even after throwing 2 "interceptions" we still had a chance. For **** sake dinwiddie
In hindsight, with video replay the way it is now we probably win that game. Due to the aforementioned "interceptions".
-
-
6 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:
I do feel bad for you. As a fan, I personally experienced 3 Grey Cup wins in 84, 88 & 90. The 84 victory was the sweetest win I have ever experienced. Seeing what the Bombers have been through since, I really cherish those memories. I've been alive long enough to remember the Bud Grant era but I was just a kid. I was 7 when the Bombers won in 1962. Didn't understand or followed the game at that age though so I didn't care. Hopefully for you Jud, the wait won't be much longer.
Whenever someone bites a stalk of celery I get flashbacks to Kevin Glenn's wrist breaking. I still wake up in a cold sweat yelling "Run Dinwiddie! For God sakes, just run!".
- Atomic, BigBlueFanatic, Bigblue204 and 2 others
-
5
-
-
-
6 minutes ago, Mosaic said:
Haha post of the day. You get it.
Love love this time of year. I remember last year at this time many of you wanted Oshea and Walters toasted. Gotta love the CFL
Weren't we on a winning streak at this time last year?
- SPuDS, blue_gold_84 and Bigblue204
-
3
-
20 minutes ago, Mr Dee said:
You guys can call it a bad play call if you want..you're entitled...because it didn't work. I see it no different than a run up the middle that gets stuffed, or a long fade in the end zone that's too far, or for that matter, any play that didn't work. You're putting forward the belief that any other play call had a better chance of working. And that's a possibility, but not a guarantee. The very next play showed what could happen...a sack.
That play was specifically designed for that spot on the field, and it was called because the same play worked perfectly last year when it was tried. Was it still a bad call then?
To me, it was simply a call that didn't work, nothing more, nothing less.
Any play where the QB plays QB and the receiver plays receiver automatically has a better chance of working. The trick play is the kind of thing you run where the offence has struggled and you magically find yourself in scoring range and in need of a momentum swing. When your starters are dominating the way they did on that drive, you keep riding them.
I almost hated the play where they kept Lefevour in after a 2nd (3rd?) and short even more. They have tried that a bunch of times this season and it has almost always been stopped for little or no gain, largely because the defense knows he isn't going to throw the ball. As soon as he stayed in I said to my wife, "Oh great, let's watch Lefevour run for 2 yards and kill all the momentum we had on this drive". Sure enough...
Nichols was the hot hand. Stop trying to be so damn cute.
- SpeedFlex27, TBURGESS and Bigblue204
-
2
-
1
-
Darvin Adams just keeps making big plays.
- wbbfan, Noeller, rebusrankin and 1 other
-
4
-
-
-
Are we really arguing that a player wouldn't want an active spot on another team because he was already doing "good enough" on the practice roster?
What to do about the D?
in Blue Bomber Discussion
Posted
Has the media asked about Johnson at all? I can't remember ever hearing a reason as to why he is out.