Jump to content

Chris Jones Post Game


rebusrankin

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mark H. said:

The truth is, Durant is still a good QB. With some good scouting the Riders could be a decent team next year. 

I  don't think so.  It's gonna be a while. Sometimes the score doesn't tell you the whole story... this game was only close because the bombers failed to actually make the riders pay for their mistakes. Riders aren't good at all and have a long way to go 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, comedygeek said:

I didn't get a chance to watch the replay until after I posted what I posted (I watched it live on a phone screen, and at that size and with Suitor/Cuthbert saying it just seemed like basic hand-fighting, I took it as such). Since I have now, I agree.

Also, I think Jones was referring to the roster fines he/the team received when he said he's fined for things other teams aren't. (He's wrong on that, too, of course!)

I was in the same boat. :)  I thought PI then I thought they got away with one and then when they had the bit with Rod Smith and Climie on Sportscentre I could see exactly what I initially saw live and what Climie commented on: the clutch and the pull through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind. Suitor drinks the green Kool aid. 

Seriously at one point he said if the riders could win this game and win next week they'd be right in the thick of the playoff race in the west. Dudes a fool. 

When the riders score a TD Glenn Suitor ejaculates Lots. 

Edited by Goalie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mark H. said:

The truth is, Durant is still a good QB. With some good scouting the Riders could be a decent team next year. 

Durant will not be the Riders starting QB next season. Jones will try all to sign Franklin and anoint him as his QB. 

Edited by M.O.A.B.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Goalie said:

Keep in mind. Suitor drinks the green Kool aid. 

Seriously at one point he said if the riders could win this game and win next week they'd be right in the thick of the playoff race in the west. Dudes a fool. 

When the riders score a TD Glenn Suitor ejaculates Lots. 

RANDY-MARSH-quotes-internet-porn.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Goalie said:

Riders aren't good at all and have a long way to go 

I think a team can turn it around quickly if their Canadian talent and QB are set. Durant will still be a decent starter next year (tho who knows what happens if Jones throws him away for Franklin) and they have some national pieces (St. John, LaBatte, Chambers, Clark, Walters, Capicotti if he emerges from whatever black hole he's disappeared into.) 

On paper, the Riders' national lineup looks way better than what the Bombers had at the start of the 2014 rebuild. Kohlert is the only starting seven guy from 2014 who's still with the BB, and Sorensen is the only guy whose dismissal I'd call a mistake.

Murphy has found a lot of American talent in his time, and will find more for them.  And I still think that Jones could be an effective head coach, he didn't suddenly take stupid pills in 2016, he's just out of his depth, trying to do too much.

Edited by johnzo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Goalie said:

Keep in mind. Suitor drinks the green Kool aid. 

Seriously at one point he said if the riders could win this game and win next week they'd be right in the thick of the playoff race in the west. Dudes a fool. 

When the riders score a TD Glenn Suitor ejaculates Lots. 

I have no solid opinion one way or the other, but it's funny to hear you say that just because all season on Riderfans and Twitter, Rider priders have been complaining about how biased Suitor is against the Riders, and how he never has anything good to say about them.

I think it goes to show that when someone isn't falling all over Saskatchewan as the best team/organization/fans ever in the history of sports, they're automatically anti-Riders.

Makes the whole "conspiracy against us" BS a little unsurprising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay wait... Jones thought the non PI call against Adams was a bad call. He was seen on TSN explaining to the ref why it should have been PI. I guess the ref learned something and decided that the next one was PI... 

How could he be mad that one was clled PI when he also thought the previous one was PI?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dr. Blue said:

Okay wait... Jones thought the non PI call against Adams was a bad call. He was seen on TSN explaining to the ref why it should have been PI. I guess the ref learned something and decided that the next one was PI... 

How could he be mad that one was clled PI when he also thought the previous one was PI?

 

Don't even try to figure Jones out. I don't even think he knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mark H. said:

The truth is, Durant is still a good QB. With some good scouting the Riders could be a decent team next year. 

I think they'd be a lot better off if they had just picked their team out of camp and stuck with it.  They'd be making fewer mistakes by now.

How about Suitor saying that Dressler will have "mixed emotions"?  A team that cut him without even a phone call? Dressler stayed classy in his comments but you know he'd been waiting for that game all season.

I'm just glad it has been proven that a Rider win on Labor Day is not preordained by God. Maybe they didn't cheer hard enough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Dr. Blue said:

Okay wait... Jones thought the non PI call against Adams was a bad call. He was seen on TSN explaining to the ref why it should have been PI. I guess the ref learned something and decided that the next one was PI... 

How could he be mad that one was clled PI when he also thought the previous one was PI?

 

That's hilarious, I saw the same thing but never thought about that way. It's like the ref said, oh okay, and bam calls Sask on it. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ex-DB thinks it was just hand fighting and the defensive player had inside position and the ex-receiver thinks it was PI because the hand fighting went on a little too long and the DB hooked the receivers arm.

Personally, I thought it was a bad call because the DB had inside position and the receiver's not allowed to come through the DB to get to the ball any more than the DB's allowed to come through the receiver. 

As for 'this is what you get if you get rid of challenges'... that's fine with me. I doubt the call would have been overturned even with a challenge because it was an 'Opinion' type of call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very soft call to take away such a critical interception but there was some contact.  I'd be pissed if the same play had gone against the Bombers and lost us the game.

But the Riders have so many more problems than one bad call.  Their defence and special teams are wildly inconsistent and Chris Jones makes bizarre in-game and roster decisions pretty regularly.  I just saw that they don't have their 3rd or 4th round pick next year either.  I don't know how they are planning on improving their Canadian situation.

Without Darian Durant that team wouldn't even be competing in games but he can't carry the whole team to wins himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets remember that there is no way that Jones is going to get fired unless he violates a morals clause- his contract is just too rich to carry and the Riders are still on the hook for 2017 paying Taman and Chambliss (who must look pretty good to the Rider fans by now).  Jones' attitude has  to be poisoning his relationships with the refs as well. No good news in Riderville, and the vets there with pride are going to start giving up soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just watched the highlights a couple times and I really do believe it was PI because, as mentioned, Dressler's arm was tied up and he wasn't allowed to come back to the ball. I sincerely believe it was the right call. 

Edited by Noeller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Atomic said:

Very soft call to take away such a critical interception but there was some contact.

 

10 minutes ago, Noeller said:

I just watched the highlights a couple times and I really do believe it was PI because, as mentioned, Dressler's arm was tied up and he wasn't allowed to come back to the ball.

Indeed, a soft call. Who wouldn't be pissed to get called like that. BUT,

I pretty well think Climie called it right. There was contact by Cox, borderline, but once he got his arm in there, and the official did see it, then it went too far.

It only seems way worse because of the point in the game, but in no way do I come out thinking the refs were just waiting, with their hands on the flag, to get those slimy green bastards.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The PI certainly wasn't the only thing that allowed us to win and the DB doesn't have to let Dressler come back to the ball if he has inside position. I could see the call happening in the beginning of the game, but in the last minute of a tied game? I wouldn't have called it and I don't think the refs should have either. 

Going for 2 stupid longish 3rd downs resulting in 2 turnovers was horrible coaching. Missing 2  FG's and a point after was horrible execution. They all had serious effects on the outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TBURGESS said:

The PI certainly wasn't the only thing that allowed us to win and the DB doesn't have to let Dressler come back to the ball if he has inside position. I could see the call happening in the beginning of the game, but in the last minute of a tied game? I wouldn't have called it and I don't think the refs should have either. 

Going for 2 stupid longish 3rd downs resulting in 2 turnovers was horrible coaching. Missing 2  FG's and a point after was horrible execution. They all had serious effects on the outcome.

if it's a penalty at the start of a game it should still be a penalty at the end of the game too. I hate this idea that it's OK to cheat when it's late in a game but not early, it sort of invalidates the early part of the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...