iso_55 Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 30 minutes ago, KptKrunch said: ? I already am didn't you know? Yet, here you are pretending to be a Bomber fan. At least be honest about it. Logan007 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KptKrunch Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 Just now, iso_55 said: Yet, here you are pretending to be a Bomber fan. At least be honest about it. I am? How? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iso_55 Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 You have the Esks & made sure we knew that last year. The Bombers are deadbeats, right? Logan007 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KptKrunch Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 Just now, iso_55 said: The Bombers are deadbeats Why would you say that? Season hasn't even started yet. They made a lot of (I think) positive changes in the off season. They still have a long way to go, especially Drew Willy. But bottom line is Drew give the Bombers the best chance to win. I'd like to see him stay healthy this year to see what he can do. He's got to come of his first read though. He must get better at that. He's got arguably the worst secondary in the CFL for his first game so I hope he can light them up, we'll see. Looking forward to seeing how the #1 player in the CFL can do against Ottawa this weekend too. First week of the season is almost always the hardest to predict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iso_55 Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 No, they were deadbeats to you last season. Not to me. Logan007 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KptKrunch Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 38 minutes ago, iso_55 said: No, they were deadbeats to you last season. Not to me. Ohhhhhhh last season. What's your point? I'm looking at this season, I don't live in the past like you obviously do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HardCoreBlue Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 10 hours ago, KptKrunch said: Ohhhhhhh last season. What's your point? I'm looking at this season, I don't live in the past like you obviously do The point? Loyalty. iso_55 and Logan007 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweep the leg Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 Harris listed as starter for the game per Darren Cameron! MOBomberFan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 johnzo and yogi 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 sincerely hope they're not jeopardizing the long term just to have him in there for Game 1... Fan Boy, Logan007, iso_55 and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KyleK Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 6 minutes ago, Noeller said: sincerely hope they're not jeopardizing the long term just to have him in there for Game 1... I'd hope they are smarter than to do put him out to get hurt again right away but at this point, nothing surprises me anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweep the leg Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 6 minutes ago, Noeller said: sincerely hope they're not jeopardizing the long term just to have him in there for Game 1... Do you honestly believe the training staff would give him the go ahead if they thought it would cause long term problems? blitzmore and MTA 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 Short answer? Yes. Long answer? I think they know how important he is to the roster, and maybe more importantly to them, they know how important he is at the ticket window. If he's *close*, they'd let him play, even if he's not fully 100% yet. And honestly, if it's a situation where he could tweak it again and miss 6 weeks, I'd rather sit him this week and give him a pile of time to heal up good n proper before the next game... Logan007 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrg Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 13 minutes ago, Noeller said: sincerely hope they're not jeopardizing the long term just to have him in there for Game 1... They have to declare their roster now. They won't play him if he's not ready, but they won't make that decision until tomorrow. I am curious what they would have done with the 4th DI if he was 100% though. Still Flanders, or...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HardCoreBlue Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 8 minutes ago, sweep the leg said: Do you honestly believe the training staff would give him the go ahead if they thought it would cause long term problems? As well, in this day in age unlike previous generations, there is a lot more protocol to follow in returning from injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-F-F-C Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 3 minutes ago, mbrg said: They have to declare their roster now. They won't play him if he's not ready, but they won't make that decision until tomorrow. I am curious what they would have done with the 4th DI if he was 100% though. Still Flanders, or...? This is a good point. Announce him as starting now, to help ticket sales, then can always sit him at game time... Fatty Liver 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrg Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 (edited) And they'll still scratch four two of these guys prior to game time (duh), so it still might not be Flanders. Edited June 23, 2016 by mbrg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweep the leg Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 5 minutes ago, Noeller said: Short answer? Yes. Long answer? I think they know how important he is to the roster, and maybe more importantly to them, they know how important he is at the ticket window. If he's *close*, they'd let him play, even if he's not fully 100% yet. And honestly, if it's a situation where he could tweak it again and miss 6 weeks, I'd rather sit him this week and give him a pile of time to heal up good n proper before the next game... I'm sure if they think it's possible he could miss the next six weeks if he plays tomorrow, they'd rather sit him too. They have tickets to sell over that time span as well. MOBomberFan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTA Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 Al is one of the best at his job in the CFL or NFL, He is not going to put Harris out there if more damaged could be done. No one on this board knows if its a hamstring pull, tweak or tear. A tweak can heal in 5 days blitzmore, Jacquie and Brandon 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpan85 Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 Looks Flanders will be on the 44 no matter what with Bond not dressing. Burnett Medlock McDuffie and Flanders being DI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 yeah, the more I read, the more I think we'll see Flanders get reps tomorrow. Maybe a lighter workload for Harris to save him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 And to all the people who question our Canadian depth - is anyone worried that we aren't using more than one DI on defense tomorrow? No? Canadian depth allows us that luxury. Brandon and BigBlueFanatic 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweep the leg Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 So who's the second guy, other than Bond, on that chart to sit tomorrow? One of the nine linebackers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted June 23, 2016 Report Share Posted June 23, 2016 1 minute ago, sweep the leg said: So who's the second guy, other than Bond, on that chart to sit tomorrow? One of the nine linebackers? I would assume Gauthier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now