DR. CFL Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 How does anyone here have any real indication of the size of Glenn's hands let alone anything related to his anatomy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigblue204 Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 How does anyone here have any real indication of the size of Glenn's hands let alone anything related to his anatomy? I've held his hands before....you don't know...you can't prove anything! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DR. CFL Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 Nice try..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigseye Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 How does anyone here have any real indication of the size of Glenn's hands let alone anything related to his anatomy? Sorry, that was a nasty nate gem, I couldn't resist. Nate always contended that the reason Glenn couldn't play in cold weather was because his hands were too small to grip the football when they got cold. I have no idea if it's fact or not but based on past performance, one could make the argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DR. CFL Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 Sadly there are those that wish to believe that black players can't play in the cold as well. Just an unfortunate reality that rascism remains a serious problem in today's society. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KptKrunch Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 Glenn will make Montreal better for sure - and with that defense should be good for a win. That's all they may need is one win if B.C. can't get it done. Not worried at all about us - we're done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 Last few games Nichols has been pretty bad actually. Over throws and just happy feet all the time. Thing MB is the problem but when your QB can't throw a pass to save his life .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueandgoldguy Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 The amount of Glenn detractors out there always surprises me. The closest we have come to replacing Glenn since he left is Willy, and Drew has yet to prove to me that he is even "as good" as Glenn was in his prime, never mind better. Willy is already better than Glenn ever was and that's including 2007. lol, no Willy still has to show a little bit more to be as good as a prime Glenn from 2005 - 2012. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearpants Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 Glenns tiny hands in the cold and rain would have been even worse than Nichols performance.You know what they say about guys with small hands... They wear small gloves... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iso_55 Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 How does anyone here have any real indication of the size of Glenn's hands let alone anything related to his anatomy? Sorry, that was a nasty nate gem, I couldn't resist. Nate always contended that the reason Glenn couldn't play in cold weather was because his hands were too small to grip the football when they got cold. I have no idea if it's fact or not but based on past performance, one could make the argument. Why are we even discussing that dipshit Nate? Go on Riderfans to see what he thinks of the Bombers & Winnipeg in general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
do or die Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 Well, Nate has to suck up to Rider fans......at this stage of his posting life....he has nowhere else to go..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBBFanWest Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracker Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. It was a first game after two practices. Lets wait until next game to pass judgement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBBFanWest Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. It was a first game after two practices. Lets wait until next game to pass judgement. I seem to recall Glenn saying that it would only take him a day or to to learn a new playbook. Seems he might have been a little off in his estimate. I'd agree with you except for the fact that Glenn looked a lot like this during his time with Saskatchewan. He's well past his best before date and it really shows, practices not withstanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBURGESS Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 Glenns stats would have looked a lot better if his receivers had caught the ball they way they usually do. Probably wouldn't have changed the outcome though because Hamilton is a way better team than Montreal this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty Liver Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 Glenns stats would have looked a lot better if his receivers had caught the ball they way they usually do. Probably wouldn't have changed the outcome though because Hamilton is a way better team than Montreal this year. The Mtl. O-line did Glenn no favours either, giving him very little time to get rid of the ball. Either the Ti-Cats pass rush is unstoppable or the Mtl. O-line has declined big time from the days of Calvillo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. Well Nichols couldn't play after just joining a new team, Glenn could, still coming up Glenn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KptKrunch Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. Well Nichols couldn't play after just joining a new team, Glenn could, still coming up Glenn. I don't know - he wasn't terrible but really, two days of practice and he starts. QBing must really be an issue in Montreal. Is Crompton hurt again? May have missed some stuff as only concentrating on bombers and eskie news right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigg jay Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. Well Nichols couldn't play after just joining a new team, Glenn could, still coming up Glenn. I don't know - he wasn't terrible but really, two days of practice and he starts. QBing must really be an issue in Montreal. Is Crompton hurt again? May have missed some stuff as only concentrating on bombers and eskie news right now. Montreal put him on the 6 game list on Sept 30th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBBFanWest Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. Well Nichols couldn't play after just joining a new team, Glenn could, still coming up Glenn. Yes, because the circumstances between Winnipeg and Montreal were exactly the same, right? And in any case, a loss is a loss is a loss, so the fact that they rushed Glenn out there lead to exactly the same result as us not rushing Nichols into action. Dang that relentless logic. Always getting in the way. SPuDS, Goalie and Bigblue204 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPuDS Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own.So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own. Well Nichols couldn't play after just joining a new team, Glenn could, still coming up Glenn. Yes, because the circumstances between Winnipeg and Montreal were exactly the same, right? And in any case, a loss is a loss is a loss, so the fact that they rushed Glenn out there lead to exactly the same result as us not rushing Nichols into action. Dang that relentless logic. Always getting in the way. Exactly lol. He looked horrible cuz he had minimal reps with offense. Just like nichols woulda with minimal reps. If we did throw him into the breech, the same complainers would say we set him up to fail or hes obviously garbage, etc etc.. There is no winning with some posters here.. Bigblue204 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBBFanWest Posted October 19, 2015 Report Share Posted October 19, 2015 So after watching last nights debacle anyone still want to rush to Nichols defence? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own.So after watching the Montreal debacle does anyone still want to rush to Glenn's defense? Yeah there were more problems than just him but he was pretty crap all on his own.Well Nichols couldn't play after just joining a new team, Glenn could, still coming up Glenn.Yes, because the circumstances between Winnipeg and Montreal were exactly the same, right? And in any case, a loss is a loss is a loss, so the fact that they rushed Glenn out there lead to exactly the same result as us not rushing Nichols into action. Dang that relentless logic. Always getting in the way. Exactly lol. He looked horrible cuz he had minimal reps with offense. Just like nichols woulda with minimal reps. If we did throw him into the breech, the same complainers would say we set him up to fail or hes obviously garbage, etc etc.. There is no winning with some posters here.. No, the point I'm making was that there was some suggestion that because Glenn was sent in with minimal reps, that that somehow makes him better/superior than Nichols. But clearly, when looking at the results, it neither supports nor refutes the argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueandgold Posted October 20, 2015 Report Share Posted October 20, 2015 What's the excuse for Glenn going to be when he struggles again this week? SPuDS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraser Posted October 20, 2015 Report Share Posted October 20, 2015 What's the excuse for Glenn going to be when he struggles again this week? Mercury is in retrograde rebusrankin and IC Khari 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now