Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread

[Super Duper Negatron]

Nobody disagrees with the league that the attendance numbers in the larger markets are unsustainable and something needs to change.

I think very few of us think these changes will make a dent in that.

[Goalie]

1 minute ago, Slimy Sculpin said:

It was a very quick Google search (and it is the Internet so you might take these numbers with a grain of salt) but the World Cup (final and overall) appears to beat the Super Bowl.

https://the18.com/en/soccer-news/world-cup-vs-super-bowl-by-numbers-viewers-revenue-tv-ratings

There is no doubt in my mind that soccer (football to those purist snobs) is more popular world wide and it's gaining traction in Canada. And, it's not just kids of immigrants who are taking up the sport. So, can these kids and their parents be attracted to the CFL? I don't think that what the league office offered up yesterday will do the trick.

I think it was talking North America cuz everyone outside North America  plays soccer. Hell Mexico loves soccer and like you said it’s growing rapid here and in the US. It’s funny. I got neighbours and they got kids. They don’t play football but they go to games. They play soccer and baseball. I see lots of kids in the ghetto here with bombers hats or shirts on. But Winnipeg is the flag ship. Not sure I see that in the big smoke or la belle provence or on the left coast. 

[ShyGuy]

2 hours ago, Bubba Zanetti said:

It will 100% lower scoring. Thats what i cant figure out about all this. You cant attract fans so youre going to make the games lower scoring and less exciting?? Shorter endzones = less TD's. Uprights at the back of the endzone =  less field goals/more punts, so longer fields for the offenses to travel/way less if any exciting missed field goal returns. I dont understand. Like WTF is this??

The league estimates that the changes will result in 60 more touchdowns a year.

I would like to see their math on that.

[wbbfan]

7 minutes ago, ShyGuy said:

The league estimates that the changes will result in 60 more touchdowns a year.

I would like to see their math on that.

I bet it was written in crayon on construction paper. 

[17to85]

9 minutes ago, ShyGuy said:

The league estimates that the changes will result in 60 more touchdowns a year.

I would like to see their math on that.

I'd like to see their indirect fan engagement on it too. 

[wbbfan]

bob tweeted paraphrasing from mos, I guess coaches show was last night? And apparently mos hates all the rule changes. 

[Piggy 1]

11 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

bob tweeted paraphrasing from mos, I guess coaches show was last night? And apparently mos hates all the rule changes. 

Yeah ,made a point of listening yesterday ,first time ever. He isnt too pleased about it. Isnt he on the rules committee? 

[M.Silverback]

11 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

bob tweeted paraphrasing from mos, I guess coaches show was last night? And apparently mos hates all the rule changes. 

Not surprised. Dude still can't comprehend the designated nationalized American rule, and is reviewing Streveler game film from 2019. 

[Super Duper Negatron]

24 minutes ago, ShyGuy said:

The league estimates that the changes will result in 60 more touchdowns a year.

I would like to see their math on that.

Someone on reddit dug up the numbers when the NFL moved the goalposts back and apparently it resulted in more punting, more missed field goals, and no increase in TDs.

[Tracker]

15 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

I don't mourn the loss of the 55 yard line. I mourn the loss of wide FG return like we saw on Saturday. Those returnds will never happen once the rules & field changes occur. The ST play we enjoy will be gone.

Contrary to bovine excrement we are being fed, the narrower and shorter field and the smaller endzones will mean less scoring and the other changes will both dumb the game down and strip away the unpredictability which means less excitement. A pox on all their houses.

[Arnold_Palmer]

18 minutes ago, Super Duper Negatron said:

Someone on reddit dug up the numbers when the NFL moved the goalposts back and apparently it resulted in more punting, more missed field goals, and no increase in TDs.

Yeah I think it’s funny how it’s just taken as a matter of fact scoring will increase significantly, I see it the other way where instead of long field goals you’ll see a lot more corner coffin punts. Do you really think all these teams will be going for it around the 40-45 yard line? I doubt it. 

[JuranBoldenRules]

26 minutes ago, Super Duper Negatron said:

Someone on reddit dug up the numbers when the NFL moved the goalposts back and apparently it resulted in more punting, more missed field goals, and no increase in TDs.

Yeah with the special teams aspect the only way to change it would be to do something to force teams to not kick.  Like if you only get so many punts per half or something....which would also be stupid.  Coaches are going to be conservative and play the long game.  Kickers and punters are also crazy accurate these days so would you rather go for it 3rd and 5 from the 40 or pin the other team inside their 5 and take the chance they go 2 and out or turn it over?

Any benefit they get from no posts (consider the posts act both ways in terms of offense being able to use them for a pick) is negated by losing the yards in the endzone that D has to defend.  Think of how many TD's are scored in the back corner of the endzone.

There's no way for them to definitively say these rule changes create scoring.

[rebusrankin]

MOS hates these changes? MOS is in my good books again. Mike, if you want to roster 30 DBs, go for it. 

[Noeller]

The vast majority of the calls were people screaming blue murder and Osh told them they should let the team and the league know exactly how they feel. 

Yes, he is on the rules committee... Which were not consulted at all.... And that's a huge part of why he's pissed, I'd bet.