Noeller Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 Tracker 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 Sounds about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBlink Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 I think a lot of people would argue Leggett should be on here. Fred C Dobbs, SPuDS, Nash00 and 5 others 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yogi Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 (edited) Lol, only 4 guys from the entire Eastern division. There's an argument for Leggett for sure, but the 3 LBs who were named are studs too. Edited December 7, 2016 by yogi Wanna-B-Fanboy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 24 minutes ago, BBlink said: I think a lot of people would argue Leggett should be on here. Bauming made the point that none of SAM/Dimeback's were voted as All Stars. wbbfan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 24 minutes ago, BBlink said: I think a lot of people would argue Leggett should be on here. I think that they really need to dedicate one LB spot to a SAM, but they don't and until they do, it's somewhat hard to argue Leggett should be there over the other 3. I guess. SPuDS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 Seems like bighill and Elimimian... as good as they are... were rewarded based on reputation. Bo Levi Mitchell thinks Leggett should have got the nod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbbfan Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 1 hour ago, BBlink said: I think a lot of people would argue Leggett should be on here. this. I think randle was all star worthy again, but in less time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 (edited) Bighill over Leggett? No. For one thing, Leggett doesn't have his very own Elimimian... Edited December 7, 2016 by Mr Dee Wanna-B-Fanboy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBlink Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 (edited) 24 minutes ago, wbbfan said: this. I think randle was all star worthy again, but in less time. If there were more fancy stats in football, Randle would definitely be in the conversation. Edit: And Leggett would be a no brainer. Edited December 7, 2016 by BBlink wbbfan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigg jay Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 (edited) 2 hours ago, Goalie said: Bo Levi Mitchell thinks Leggett should have got the nod So does Brandon Whittaker. Just motivation for him to be even better next year! Edited December 7, 2016 by bigg jay Mr Dee, wbbfan and Wanna-B-Fanboy 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearpants Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 (edited) clearly the problem is they named 3 LBers regardless of which LB position they play... which shouldn't be... if they did that with other positions then theoretically the whole O-line could be tackles and the entire secondary could be corners or an all slotback WR corps, etc... doesn't makes sense for the other positions, so why for LB?... there's no question Leggett was 1) a difference maker in every game he played and 2) the best SAM LB in the league this year... so he got screwed b/c of the lack of positional distinction... Edited December 7, 2016 by bearpants Mr Dee and Esks1975 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark F Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 (edited) 1 hour ago, Mr Dee said: Bighill over Leggett? No. For one thing, Leggett doesn't have his very own Elimimian... which is why he was elimimianated from consideration. Obviously Moe should have been in there. How many game changing plays and outright winning plays did he make? Wasn't it Moe who stopped BC I think it was at the goal line along the sideline with a brilliant play? Edited December 7, 2016 by Mark F Mr Dee and Wanna-B-Fanboy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbbfan Posted December 8, 2016 Report Share Posted December 8, 2016 On 12/7/2016 at 1:29 PM, bearpants said: clearly the problem is they named 3 LBers regardless of which LB position they play... which shouldn't be... if they did that with other positions then theoretically the whole O-line could be tackles and the entire secondary could be corners or an all slotback WR corps, etc... doesn't makes sense for the other positions, so why for LB?... there's no question Leggett was 1) a difference maker in every game he played and 2) the best SAM LB in the league this year... so he got screwed b/c of the lack of positional distinction... its the same thing with naming 2 RBs in stead of an extra WR to be honest. It should be 5 OL, 1 rb 5 wr 1 qb. 4 DL 2 LBs 1 sam 1 saftey 4 DBs. At the same time kick cover guys deserve a nod too imop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedFlex27 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 On 12/7/2016 at 10:43 AM, Mike said: I think that they really need to dedicate one LB spot to a SAM, but they don't and until they do, it's somewhat hard to argue Leggett should be there over the other 3. I guess. Agree. I think they should do that for every position. If a player is a right tackle then he can't be slotted in at guard or tackle, for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearpants Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 On 12/7/2016 at 1:29 PM, bearpants said: if they did that with other positions then theoretically the whole O-line could be tackles and the entire secondary could be corners or an all slotback WR corps, etc... 14 hours ago, wbbfan said: its the same thing with naming 2 RBs in stead of an extra WR to be honest. That was kinda the point of the etc... I thought listing 3 position groups would suffice to making my point... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbbfan Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 1 hour ago, bearpants said: That was kinda the point of the etc... I thought listing 3 position groups would suffice to making my point... its a pretty huge difference between allstaring all slot backs vs a wr and a rb or a cb and a dhb. Sam and rb work entirely different from lb and wr. Its like having 5 DEs and 1 less db. Pass catchers are pass catchers. The use of trips formations and motion you see any one lined up at any position through out a game. You dont see khalil bass covering wrs in man etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taynted_Fayth Posted December 11, 2016 Report Share Posted December 11, 2016 im a little surprised Heath over leggett tbh. they were tied (at least at one point) in INTs but Leggett brought a lot more to the team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearpants Posted December 13, 2016 Report Share Posted December 13, 2016 On 12/10/2016 at 6:25 PM, Taynted_Fayth said: im a little surprised Heath over leggett tbh. they were tied (at least at one point) in INTs but Leggett brought a lot more to the team They play different positions Goalie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now