-
Posts
6,657 -
Joined
-
Days Won
41
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Posts posted by bigg jay
-
-
28 minutes ago, TommyClements said:
It surprises me actually that RBs are undervalued compared to receivers, who get far fewer touches in a game.
i don’t like that the BB are paying such a premium for Brady over all other RBs but I’m more comfortable giving 300 k to a guy who can run block and pass at a high level than to a receiver.
I'm not - it's a numbers game. There are so many RB's coming out of college or other leagues but so few spots so if someone wants too much, teams can move on fairly easy. Brady has a lot of value to the club off the field which is why he can ask/get that kind of money and why they should be using a ton marketing money on him.
Would you take Mills or Butler over a guy like Hatcher for similar money?
54 minutes ago, Pete said:How many have won MOP award?
There's no debate from me that Brady isn't the top RB in the league - I just don't think he's so much farther ahead than the rest that he should be paid double. If he's getting a good chunk paid as marketing money then I think the contract is fair value. We don't have that info yet so we don't really know how good (or bad) of a deal it is,
-
-
2 hours ago, Brandon said:
Tyson might touch the ball 5 - 8 times per game.... Brady is touching the ball 20-30 times.... much more value in a RB then a WR.
Brady might occasionally crack 20 touches but his career average is far less than 20-30 a game.
2021 - 7 carries & 0.6 receptions
2022 - 11.2 carries & 1.3 receptions
2023 - 14.4 carries & 2.1 receptions
2024 - 14 carries & 3.5 receptions
2025 - 13.4 carries & 4.0 receptions
Also if RB's are so valuable - why is he the only one making that kind of coin? There are other RB's who put up similar production but make a fraction of what Brady does.
-
5 minutes ago, rebusrankin said:
I'd love to see the CFL publish salary information like every other sports league.
They are working on it - both the league & CFLPA says they are open to discussions but we'll see what happens.
CFL, Players' Association open to discussing public salary disclosure - 3DownNation
-
-
35 minutes ago, blue85gold said:
Wouldn’t be surprised if it was tied to gambling. Lots of stories of athletes getting threats because some ******* missed his parlay.
Yup, athletes and officials have seen a huge increase in that sort of thing as betting has become a more mainstream part of sports.
- Noeller and HardCoreBlue
-
1
-
1
-
3 hours ago, Noeller said:
This is insane.... Who in Toronto cares enough about the Argos to do this???
Bluto has been awful quiet lately...
- Noeller, HardCoreBlue, rebusrankin and 1 other
-
4
-
5 minutes ago, Noeller said:
It makes all the sense in the world for him to try and get a shot for as long as he can and I certainly wouldn't fault him.
Having said that, it's interesting that they seemingly told Walters that if it doesn't pan out this NFL season, that they'll be in camp come May.
Unless they told Walters something different, his agent didn't specify a timeline when he commented on it a month ago. Weinrauch said he'd be happy to sign here if/when all NFL opportunities are exhausted.
It was was Walters who said they probably won't know until after Feb 1st when NFL futures contracts are signed. That might be something they discussed privately though.
-
8 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:
No idea who this is.
Sums up about 95% of these RIP threads. Mainly D List (at best) "celebs" that nobody has heard of.
Do we really need a post to hear the 3rd cousin once removed of the person who voiced Tickle me Elmo died? I don't think so but here we are! 😂
-
7 minutes ago, Wanna-B-Fanboy said:
All this hate being heaped on Walters... does anyone else think that he may have been a victim of our less than stellar talent scouts? I mean we lost two maybe three impactful talent scouts since 2019. I feel that may be part of the reason for our lack of talent across the board.
Don't get me wrong- KW does deserve a good portion o the blame.
I think that our new scouting staff is off to a decent start as they have found a few keepers already. You're only going to have so many rookies making an impact (especially with this HC) and they brought in Vavel, Woodbey & Allen this year. If Perkins amounts to anything up here, you can credit Sunderland for that since he's been after him since at least 2019. That said - DB & LB was not our biggest weak spot going so if, during this off-season, they want to focus on getting some stud DL's signed, that'd be much appreciated!
-
-
23 minutes ago, Booch said:
It's possible that nobody actually saw a playbook hahaha
I imagine it was pretty close to this...
- Wanna-B-Fanboy, rebusrankin, Booch and 2 others
-
5
-
48 minutes ago, rebusrankin said:
Why?
So we can yell No deal McCutcheon everytime he breaks up a play?
- wbbfan, rebusrankin, MOBomberFan and 5 others
-
4
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
-
21 minutes ago, GCn20 said:
There is a kind of loose justification every team must give the league for the marketing money. According to most reports I've read about the justification to the league it is pretty close to "trust me bro".
The league had announced a crackdown on abuse of the system last year - that was under Ambrosie though so who knows how Johnston feels about it or how hard they actually enforced the rules.
-
-
-
1 hour ago, rebusrankin said:
If there is no limit on market money, the Bombers should use it extensively. Club has been making bank the past few years.
Yep, the only limit is that the team has to be able to justify the amount of marketing money being paid to a player. If BC was allowed to give Rourke 200k, the Bombers should have no problems giving Brady a good chunk either.
- GCn20, Bigblue204, HardCoreBlue and 1 other
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
-
-
-
2 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:
It probably is. But it'll set the market for running backs like Diedrick Mills. & James Butler as well. We lose Brady what's the proability we replace him with a running back that's even close to what Oliveira does for us??? That's the problem. Replacing him. Not paying him.
Again, paying him isn't the problem. It's replacing him.
Brady tried to reset the market for RB's last year and it only worked out for him. It did not affect the other salaries.
The top RB in the league last year (Mills) made a whopping $123,450 last year - half of what Brady did. Butler (3rd overall for RB's) made slightly less at $120k. You absolutely can replace his production for a much lower price. The hit for the Bombers would be off the field - everyone loves Brady (myself included) and it would suck to see him leave.
-
7 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:
If that's the market, so be it. I believe even our tone deaf, can't read the room, sits on his ass in free agency of a GM in Kyle Walters knows he has to sign Brady. To make up for it get rid of some deadwood on the roster. Especially one entitled vet who thinks he has a job for life, in particular.
We're all going.... WTH??? Almost every position costs more, now. QB, receiver OL... About the only position you can still sign cheap vets is defensive back. . That'll probably be changing as well.
He was already the highest paid RB by a wide margin (240k vs 160kish for Ouellette) so it's not like we were being cheapskates with him. Bumping him up another 60k is crazy.
- bustamente, Booch, Bigblue204 and 2 others
-
2
-
3
-
Unless it's a contract heavily loaded with marketing money so it doesn't affect the cap - hard pass for me at that price point.
- WildPath, rebusrankin, bustamente and 2 others
-
3
-
2

25/26 CFL (Non Bombers) Off Season Thread
in Blue Bomber Discussion
Posted · Edited by bigg jay
https://3downnation.com/2025/12/17/hamilton-tiger-cats-hire-brock-sunderland-from-winnipeg-blue-bombers/
Interesting that it's a lateral move and not a promotion.