Jump to content

CFL - 2023 Regular Season - Discussion Thread


JCon

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mike said:

It really has been. And just like I hinted at yesterday, the depth chart came out and he’s making absolutely no effective use of this new rule at all.

The roster management has been awful and the talent has carried us. I like O’Shea a lot, but his roster decisions leave more than just a little bit to be desired.

agreed...and why use Grant?...is an odd choice....nothing against Grant but is the the best choice to maximize this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Booch said:

agreed...and why use Grant?...is an odd choice....nothing against Grant but is the the best choice to maximize this?

They are basically just using it like a di. Unless they intend to rotate grant in a package which I doubt. Sad but not surprising.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There may be a myriad of reasons behind the scenes which we have no idea about. MOS favor 's special teams and we are just not privy to his other decisions or reasons for such decisions. But since he is the best coach we have had in 2 decades i prefer to defer to his expertise over said posters on the venerable Morning Big Blue....😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, bb1 said:

There may be a myriad of reasons behind the scenes which we have no idea about. MOS favor 's special teams and we are just not privy to his other decisions or reasons for such decisions. But since he is the best coach we have had in 2 decades i prefer to defer to his expertise over said posters on the venerable Morning Big Blue....😆

MOS will have his statue outside IGF one day. Doesn't mean he's perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, wbbfan said:

Many things can be said of va. Head on straight isn’t one of them. 
 

agree. And despite how great mos has been if we have to choose between walters and mos, I’d keep walters. 

Walters contract is up at the end of this year and there's no guarantee he continues in his current role.  The job is obviously his if he wants it, but there are often reasons people change career paths mid-life, better opportunity, more salary, less workload, greater job contentment.  You can kind of tell O'Shea is happy where he is but no real indication Walters feels the same way about his role.

Edited by Fatty Liver
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

I mean Bailey probably makes more sense if you’re actually going to use it but Grant makes sense too for the amount he’d play to sub in and if a Canadian goes down on O he can play the rest of the game.

Should have labelled Castillo as one at least to mindfuck the Tabbies.

100% a MOS thing to do...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Perfect said:

Jesus Christ lol. Three straight Grey Cup appearances, two championships....think before hitting submit.

Ok. But we still need to be able to engage in constructive criticism or we may as well shut the whole board down.

No one is infallible and for all the positive things MOS brings, there are some negative side effects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Fatty Liver said:

Walters contract is up at the end of this year and there's no guarantee he continues in his current role.  The job is obviously his if he wants it, but there are often reasons people change career paths mid-life, better opportunity, more salary, less workload, greater job contentment.  You can kind of tell O'Shea is happy where he is but no real indication Walters feels the same way about his role.

With the management cap I think we will see a trend of hc GMs again. It’s hard to pay both under the cap. Since walters has stayed this long and with no deal for next year I think he’s as happy to be here as any one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 hours ago, Jesse said:

Ok. But we still need to be able to engage in constructive criticism or we may as well shut the whole board down.

No one is infallible and for all the positive things MOS brings, there are some negative side effects.

One saying they expected nothing less from Osh and implying we win in spite of him is not constructive criticism. It's frankly just stupid and moronic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...