Tracker Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 2 hours ago, 3rdand1.5 said: Ford,still even with the Injuries we have, I stand by he would not be worth his contract. Lawler in hindsight was a "miss" even at his contract value...... With Collaros functioning im "limp home" performance mode, do you think that even Lawler would be thriving this year? Highly doubtful.
Arnold_Palmer Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago Have no issues with us bringing in Houston. I was the first to say I was ok letting him go to Calgary for the big money contract. With our injury issues I’m more than ok letting him fight for a job. He’s a good player. ddanger 1
Tracker Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago (edited) 6 minutes ago, Arnold_Palmer said: Have no issues with us bringing in Houston. I was the first to say I was ok letting him go to Calgary for the big money contract. With our injury issues I’m more than ok letting him fight for a job. He’s a good player. Except for his tendency to go for the flashy play instead of making the tackle or knockdown. Edited 21 hours ago by Tracker wbbfan 1
Arnold_Palmer Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Tracker said: Except for his tendency to go for the flashy play instead of making the tackle or knockdown. He takes some chances. I don’t mind him fighting for a job we need some help in the secondary with the injuries. He has a lot to prove fighting for a job so you hope best case scenario he comes in hungry and plays smart, worst case scenario he doesn’t cut it and he’s off the roster. Low risk move in my opinion. Tracker 1
wbbfan Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Arnold_Palmer said: Have no issues with us bringing in Houston. I was the first to say I was ok letting him go to Calgary for the big money contract. With our injury issues I’m more than ok letting him fight for a job. He’s a good player. he could possibly be a good player, if he reigned in his gambling he’d have a chance. If he hasn’t gotten past the reckless play he’s gonna be another bridges. The league has seen plenty of db injuries, and no one else has brought him in. I like Dandy coming back. he was one of the guys that should’ve stuck in camp. Sucks that cooley is gone, but we can barely make use of brady, and peterson has shown he has legit talent. wouldn’t mind if cooley is back in camp if he doesn’t get picked up. Im glad we’ve made moves, i wish we brought in more wrs though. that’s a bigger hole than db. BigBlueFanatic, rebusrankin, ddanger and 3 others 3 3
Tracker Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 14 minutes ago, wbbfan said: he could possibly be a good player, if he reigned in his gambling he’d have a chance. If he hasn’t gotten past the reckless play he’s gonna be another bridges. The league has seen plenty of db injuries, and no one else has brought him in. I like Dandy coming back. he was one of the guys that should’ve stuck in camp. Sucks that Cooley is gone, but we can barely make use of brady, and Peterson has shown he has legit talent. wouldn’t mind if Cooley is back in camp if he doesn’t get picked up. I'm glad we’ve made moves, i wish we brought in more wrs though. that’s a bigger hole than db. Sooo many holes... wbbfan 1
Stickem Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago Good move on Houston.... we have no problem, as it seems the altercation with his wife wasn't what had actually transpired...His penchant for 'show boating' which raised the ire of a few, is overcome by his talent as a pretty good db...something this club is in dire need of....Too bad we couldn't keep Cooley....someone will pick him up...Like the Petersen kid though....he has the tools and has a good future in the league.....Hopefully he sticks around ddanger 1
Booch Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago Houston has exerience in league....knows the players and the standard sets in the CFL and has familiarity with basically most our defense so if anything thats a plus Has he evolved his game and is more cerebral about his approach and picks a better time to gamble?....we shall see.....I really don't recal his CGY performance tho....did he reign it in a bit there? Dandy I also agree...why he was let go is beyond me....other than the typical Osh tendency to keep hold overs even if not the best choice....and brings a lil more physicality too which is needed Imagine if from game 1 we had dressed Person....Allen...say a Dandy, had Schmeck from game one as opposed to the what in the hell Korn rostering...Even J.Jones tho he still gets limited reps....how much further along we could be on defenc with cohesion and guys getting reps/experience wbbfan, Tracker, Bigblue204 and 1 other 4
Noeller Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago As long as the team keeps making steps in the right direction... Keeps getting healthier... Keeps bringing in guys who can play.... I'm happy. Fix the OL and give Collaros more time, and I think he (and the whole O) starts looking better... rebusrankin 1
Nolby Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 26 minutes ago, Noeller said: As long as the team keeps making steps in the right direction... Keeps getting healthier... Keeps bringing in guys who can play.... I'm happy. Fix the OL and give Collaros more time, and I think he (and the whole O) starts looking better... Exactly. Zach put up his best #'s when our Oline was dominant. Noeller 1
Jets Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 7 hours ago, 17to85 said: I much prefer schoen to Lawler but that's me. Lawler can be amazing, but some games he wasn't amazing. We can debate schoen coming off the injury and whether he was ready or not but I'd have picked schoen over Lawler too. Same here. And with hindsight, maybe we just weren't using Lawler to his full potential. Felt like with us we'd just toss up a couple 50 yard jump balls to him and he'd make a couple highlight catches. Hamilton is just using him as a stud in all situations and its working. Bigblue204 and Noeller 2
Bomberguy Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago When he walks into his first practice this week will Osh exclaim “Houston we have a problem”?😉
Nolby Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 2 hours ago, Bomberguy said: When he walks into his first practice this week will Osh exclaim “Houston we have a problem”?😉 I hope Houston walks in and questions Osh why Thomas is still ******* starting Tracker, Booch, rebusrankin and 3 others 1 5
SpeedFlex27 Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 15 hours ago, CrazyCanuck89 said: Your recievers aren't the problem. The QB play has been lacking this year. I don't think so. No CFL qb would play well with the receiverss we have now. 8 hours ago, Noeller said: As long as the team keeps making steps in the right direction... Keeps getting healthier... Keeps bringing in guys who can play.... I'm happy. Fix the OL and give Collaros more time, and I think he (and the whole O) starts looking better... How do you propose we "fix the OL" mid season? This should have been addressed in the off season by Walters. Then we have Osh always starting Kolo. Nothing ever gets done. Edited 11 hours ago by SpeedFlex27
Goalie Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 4 hours ago, Jets said: Same here. And with hindsight, maybe we just weren't using Lawler to his full potential. Felt like with us we'd just toss up a couple 50 yard jump balls to him and he'd make a couple highlight catches. Hamilton is just using him as a stud in all situations and its working. Except for the last 2 3 weeks now. Kenny has some huge games then goes very quiet for long stretches. Seems to be his career honestly. Stretch of ridiculous games followed by stretch of invisibility followed by injury shortly. Unfortunately Kenny not worth the 300k and still isn’t. Actually honestly. He’s been over 100 yards twice in 10 games this year. His high being 207 week 5 and second highest 162 week 2. since week 5 has not gone over 100 yards receiving. I was surprised to see this. Dude really does put up a monster game or 2 followed by lots of average. Does he make us better? Probably. But probably by not as much as some might think. Edited 11 hours ago by Goalie AB BomberFan 1
Blue28 Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 5 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said: I don't think so. No CFL qb would play well with the receiverss we have now. How do you propose we "fix the OL" mid season? This should have been addressed in the off season by Walters. Then we have Osh always starting Kolo. Nothing ever gets done. Walters did draft Vibert - a centre. Hopefully they use him at some point.
Super Duper Negatron Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago At least with Houston back we are replacing a couple guys that were being over aggressive looking for picks with...oh....oh no.... Tracker, bryan35, wbbfan and 1 other 1 3
Mark H. Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 8 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said: I don't think so. No CFL qb would play well with the receivers we have now. In my opinion, that is still to be determined. There were plenty of good catches last week, as well taking hellacious hits to make plays Ottawa might not have the best secondary, but they do play with aggression wbbfan and Noeller 1 1
Pete Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 3 hours ago, Blue28 said: Walters did draft Vibert - a centre. Hopefully they use him at some point. The offensive line ran out of steam in the 4th qtr. team are using 8-9 dl ,no wonder they were in tough in qtr 4. Ly we had 2 backups Eli and wallace now its just Eli and hes getting manhandled We need to roster one more. Tracker 1
BomberBall. Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Pete said: The offensive line ran out of steam in the 4th qtr. team are using 8-9 dl ,no wonder they were in tough in qtr 4. Ly we had 2 backups Eli and wallace now its just Eli and hes getting manhandled We need to roster one more. I can’t see how the O line could run out of steam with how many 2 and outs we have. They should be well rested. ddanger, 17to85 and Tracker 1 2
bryan35 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Eli and hes getting manhandled??? Tracker and BomberBall. 2
Booch Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 13 minutes ago, bryan35 said: Eli and hes getting manhandled??? YEAH of any of our oline guys he is the last one being manhandled wbbfan, Stickem and BomberBall. 3
WinnipegGordo Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 9 hours ago, Goalie said: Except for the last 2 3 weeks now. Kenny has some huge games then goes very quiet for long stretches. Seems to be his career honestly. Stretch of ridiculous games followed by stretch of invisibility followed by injury shortly. Unfortunately Kenny not worth the 300k and still isn’t. Actually honestly. He’s been over 100 yards twice in 10 games this year. His high being 207 week 5 and second highest 162 week 2. since week 5 has not gone over 100 yards receiving. I was surprised to see this. Dude really does put up a monster game or 2 followed by lots of average. Does he make us better? Probably. But probably by not as much as some might think. I believe he is still making an impact as teams need to key in on him. This has allowed White (10th in receiving) and Smith (12th) to contribute as well. coach17 and Tracker 2
wbbfan Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 38 minutes ago, Pete said: The offensive line ran out of steam in the 4th qtr. team are using 8-9 dl ,no wonder they were in tough in qtr 4. Ly we had 2 backups Eli and wallace now its just Eli and hes getting manhandled We need to roster one more. We use Schmekel in the heavy set OL package without the 7th OL on the Roster. Then we also have MCI, and a bunch of tweener size guys to pick from. We don't need more size / extra Ol on the roster. And eli wasn't getting manhandled lol. Eli and Schmekel played really well in their heavy set pack. At this point, we are drastically better off dressing Schmekel, than Vibert. rebusrankin, Booch, coach17 and 1 other 3 1
rebusrankin Posted 12 minutes ago Report Posted 12 minutes ago I have dumped on Schmekel but he was great last game. Thus I withdraw my previous comments.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now