Tidbits courtesy of bluebombers.com and our man Ed Tait:

https://www.bluebombers.com/2023/09/02/game-preview-labour-day-classic-2/

*Note: a win this weekend would clinch a playoff spot for the Blue Bombers for a seventh straight season, their longest run since a 17-year streak ended in 1997.

- Zach Collaros is 6-0 in his career in Labour Day Classic games – 3-0 during his days in Hamilton, 1-0 in his one season in Saskatchewan and 2-0 in Winnipeg. In those games has a 13:3 TD-to-interception ratio while passing for 300 yards three times and over 400 yards in 2015 while with the Ticats.

- The Blue Bombers are 24-3 against West Division clubs since 2021.

- A victory in Regina this weekend would give the Blue Bombers a winning record on the road for the third consecutive season, matching a mark last set from 1960-62.

These are the good times, folks. I hope you are all savoring them.

 

 

 

Fairy tell finish? C’mon man puke.

How does that 2 point convert not go to review?

Need to get that call right.  

1 minute ago, Super Duper Negatron said:

Definitely deserved to lose that game. What a joke of a game against a trash team.

Pretty much yip

Just now, deepsixemtoboyd said:

Why the f:&* did MOS not challenge the 2 convert? Or can’t he?

Supposed to be automatic on a scoring play.

All in all one of Collaros worst games as a bomber despite the yards 

Suitor too...is just a moron

2 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

Sask wins on 2 point convert they didn't catch.

I don’t think they would overturn that. Ball didn’t come loose. 

Bombers were out-coached today. 

Again gents, great game. 
 

Foxcroft or whoever and his crew should be embarrassed. 

What a joke zero replays of the Sask non-convert.  None. At all.

Just now, Goalie said:

All in all one of Collaros worst games as a bomber despite the yards 

Yup...and it took everything for them to eek out a win...

Just now, deepsixemtoboyd said:

Why the f:&* did MOS not challenge the 2 convert? Or can’t he?

I thought all scoring plays are automatically reviewed and therefor not challengable.

Just now, JuranBoldenRules said:

Supposed to be automatic on a scoring play.

True, but it still should have been reviewed internally and challenged by the Bombers.

1 minute ago, Geebrr said:

We are going to **** them up next week

Bad 

Not if our offence can’t make a ******* first down for an entire half.

0 passing yards in the first quarter. Can’t win with the this slow start ****.

Just now, blue85gold said:

I don’t think they would overturn that. Ball didn’t come loose. 

He traps it against the turf to secure it.  It's not like he had it and rolled onto it.

Just now, Tracker said:

Bombers were out-coached today. 

Lol dramatic much? No. Our QB just decided to not show up until the 4th quarter. 

Just now, Tracker said:

Bombers were out-coached today. 

No they weren't. They were outplayed.

Just now, Starman115 said:

I thought all scoring plays are automatically reviewed and therefor not challengable.

You can challenge scoring plays.

Just now, blue85gold said:

Bombers played like **** and lost by 2 on OT. They’ll crush em at the banjo bowl

Who ******* cares... we lost to them in a **** game... trash officiating, trash play, 

 

Can't play against the riders, themselves the refs and the crowd.

.

2 minutes ago, Booch said:

Puke...well that was their grey cup

Hopefully eyes were opened on certain deficiencies.......

Just now, JuranBoldenRules said:

He traps it against the turf to secure it.  It's not like he had it and rolled onto it.

No different than bailey TD catch in grey cup they overturned...but whatever...they will be a 500 team again next week

1 minute ago, Yourface said:

True, but it still should have been reviewed internally and challenged by the Bombers.

Can't challenge would just take a penalty.  I mean I'm sure they are yelling at refs about it.

Just now, Goalie said:

Lol dramatic much? No. Our QB just decided to not show up until the 4th quarter. 

The offensive game play seemed to be just chuck down the field on every play. Can’t believe that was all zach.

1 minute ago, blue85gold said:

I don’t think they would overturn that. Ball didn’t come loose. 

But it hit the ground for him to secure it is what I saw on reply.

1 minute ago, Yourface said:

True, but it still should have been reviewed internally and challenged by the Bombers.

There are no challenges in OT