Who amongst the CFL executive insist on not protecting the franchise quarterbacks that is their biggest expenditure on every roster?
Who benefits from not adjusting the rules? The NFL has certainly gone to every effort to protect their franchise quarterbacks... So what is the reasoning process???
Do they just want to see violence to make the game more attractive?
The hit to Collaros was a clear attempt to injure: the hit was very late and helmet to helmet was deliberate and intentional. The offender's will be greatly rewarded for knocking our QB out of the game and who knows how many games in the immediate and distant future.
These type of deliberate non-protection QB rules cost attendance around the league. Nobody ultimately benefits from such malfeasance.
Who amongst the CFL executive insist on not protecting the franchise quarterbacks that is their biggest expenditure on every roster?
Who benefits from not adjusting the rules? The NFL has certainly gone to every effort to protect their franchise quarterbacks... So what is the reasoning process???
Do they just want to see violence to make the game more attractive?
The hit to Collaros was a clear attempt to injure: the hit was very late and helmet to helmet was deliberate and intentional. The offender's will be greatly rewarded for knocking our QB out of the game and who knows how many games in the immediate and distant future.
These type of deliberate non-protection QB rules cost attendance around the league. Nobody ultimately benefits from such malfeasance.
So tell me why?
Duh?