Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Morning Big Blue

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Who starts Zac attack vs Strevinator?

We got a couple of weeks to kill so i throw this out there. If Streveler is healthy for our playoff game does he start or do we give the vet the reins with Strev coming in off the bench to add with his skill set???

  • Replies 78
  • Views 10.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • HardCoreBlue
    HardCoreBlue

    McGuire sure did make a nice play on the winning field goal tho, high snap, brought it down nicely, turned the laces, for the win.

  • You gain nothing starting a running qb and trying to weave in a passer. But spelling a throwing qb with a mobile qb is proven effective. If collaros gets knocked out of the game as a starter we lose n

  • https://www.bluebombers.com/2019/09/07/recap-winnipeg-35-saskatchewan-10/   god how embarrassing would it be to get blown out by a short yardage specialist? 

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, HardCoreBlue said:

McGuire sure did make a nice play on the winning field goal tho, high snap, brought it down nicely, turned the laces, for the win.

And, we're missing Rempel.

Collaros no doubt

Collaros just guided the team through a game where the Stamps had everything to play for... they didn't rest anyone, and the Bombers got the W.  To me, there's no question that you ride with Zach.  He's a much better passer than Streveler and showed some mobility as well when he needs to scramble.  Just gotta hope he doesn't take a big hit, but if they can keep him upright, maybe, just maybe, Zach could be the saviour!  It's all about getting hot at the right time, and after last night, everyone in that room has to believe that they've got the talent to go get to the Cup!

Collaros took a couple of big pops in that game. He did just fine. Good to know moving forward.

  • Author

Definitely looks like Zac to start with Streveler coming off the bench if healthy. I wonder if MOS would pull out his stated no1 ( if healthy) though? Should be interesting..

You gain nothing starting a running qb and trying to weave in a passer. But spelling a throwing qb with a mobile qb is proven effective. If collaros gets knocked out of the game as a starter we lose nothing from having streveler come off the bench. If collaros has to come off the bench he has to find a passing rythym. 

Remember the hurry up package after the short yardage team got a first down last year? We can have that back. 

Not to mention it's what our offense is designed around. We never made the read option or rpo work real well. 

Collaros made better use of our system then Nichols did and showed better accuracy then we've seen in a long time. 

Play them both, the two create a massive headache for DC's to gameplan.

Strev starts if healthy,,,and have a pkg for ZC...strev has major heart and is a warrior...you go into battles with warriors.

Lol...what?  One is a CFL level starting quarterback and the other is a short yardage specialist with heart.  If O’Shea starts Streveler over Collaros he deserves what he gets after the inevitable loss

if we get behind...a strev pkg is not going to catch us up...it has to be the other way around....and we've already proven..we grind on you once and your finished.

18 minutes ago, mfranc said:

Lol...what?  One is a CFL level starting quarterback and the other is a short yardage specialist with heart.  If O’Shea starts Streveler over Collaros he deserves what he gets after the inevitable loss

That short yardage specialist with heart hung 35 on you in an absolute dominant beat down in the Banjo Bowl. That being said...play them both.

we will little man...we will

19 minutes ago, gcn11 said:

That short yardage specialist with heart hung 35 on you in an absolute dominant beat down in the Banjo Bowl. That being said...play them both.

If O'Shea starts Streveler & keeps Collaros on the bench & we lose? Gonna be hell to pay. The way it should be is Collaros starts, Streveler comes in on short Yardage & goal line & stays in & has a package of plays he runs. Otherwise, the game is for Collaros to win. 

1 minute ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

If O'Shea starts Streveler & keeps Collaros on the bench & we lose? Gonna be hell to pay. The way it should be is Collaros starts, Streveler comes in on short Yardage & goal line & stays in & has a package of plays he runs. Otherwise, the game is for Collaros to win. 

It seems certain (based on my MBB readings) that MOS is headed to Toronto next year. And, based on Pinball's tapping up of Collaros, he seems destined to return as well. 

Therefore, based on the MOS-science, I expect MOS to start Zach (Zac, Zak, Zzzak, ZZZZzzaq, Zack) in the WSF. 

On 2019-10-26 at 1:54 PM, bb1 said:

Definitely looks like Zac to start with Streveler coming off the bench if healthy. I wonder if MOS would pull out his stated no1 ( if healthy) though? Should be interesting..

This. It is possible that Streveler will not be healthy enough to play. High ankle sprains are a ***** to heal. He could easily be into next year territory.

1 hour ago, auzzstriker said:

Strev starts if healthy,,,and have a pkg for ZC...strev has major heart and is a warrior...you go into battles with warriors.

Like George Armstrong Custer?

it's very possible yes

2 hours ago, mfranc said:

Lol...what?  One is a CFL level starting quarterback and the other is a short yardage specialist with heart.  If O’Shea starts Streveler over Collaros he deserves what he gets after the inevitable loss

https://www.bluebombers.com/2019/09/07/recap-winnipeg-35-saskatchewan-10/

 

god how embarrassing would it be to get blown out by a short yardage specialist? 

imagine your QB situation was so bad you went all in on Cody Fajardo and then mouthing off to other fans about their teams QB situation.....

2 minutes ago, Noeller said:

imagine your QB situation was so bad you went all in on Cody Fajardo and then mouthing off to other fans about their teams QB situation.....

Are we still doing the Fajardo sucks thing? He's had a pretty good season.

7 minutes ago, sweep the leg said:

Are we still doing the Fajardo sucks thing? He's had a pretty good season.

he's a piece of **** and **** you for saying otherwise...

I guess I’m in line for that 4 star salute too, because I underestimated Fajardo, and I too figure he had a good year..in this bizarre  year.

he's a ******* glorified 3rd stringer and always will be.....this year is a mirage, period.

26 minutes ago, sweep the leg said:

Are we still doing the Fajardo sucks thing? He's had a pretty good season.

A lot of qbs have had 1 good season then gone to pot after defenses adjust to them. He may or may not do that itll all depend on how he adjusts. But next year is going to be much harder for him. Teams will be cheating for the timing cross route / f post, and good teams will attack him with multi level pressure packages. He destroys single layer pressures with that spin move to the left, but he hasnt shown the ability to beat multi level pressure. 

Of the upstart Qbs id love to see what MBT can do on a real team. I think Arbuckle will be the best of this batch. Evans is a gooder too. I think Fajardo Is better then vaj. Hes better then nichols and streveler, masoli and collaros. Even better then BLM this year. But Id take Reilly, arbuckle, and mbt over him.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.