Leaderboard

https://lop.parl.ca/sites/PublicWebsite/default/en_CA/ResearchPublications/201191E 3 The Federal Spending Power The federal spending power is inferred from Parliament’s jurisdiction in the Constitution Act, 1867 over public debt and property (section 91(1A)) and its general taxing power (section 91(3)). Thus, Parliament may raise money by taxation and may spend it, or grant it to others, as it sees fit. Although the provinces are responsible for the direct delivery of most medical services, the federal government uses its spending power to play a strong role in the Canadian medicare system through its financial contributions and by setting certain national standards by means of the Canada Health Act. Using its spending power, Parliament may set conditions for receipt of the money. The Canada Health Act, therefore, is constitutionally about the financing of health care, not health care directly, and the national standards it establishes are the conditions to which the provinces must adhere if they wish to continue to receive federal money. The only sanction on a province for breach of any of the Act’s criteria or conditions is for the federal government to reduce or withhold payments to the province. In a 1997 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, Justice LaForest stated that Parliament has played its role in the provision of medical care by employing its inherent spending power to set national standards for provincial medicare programs. The Canada Health Act … requires the federal government to contribute to the funding of provincial health insurance programs provided they conform with certain specified criteria. (The constitutionality of this kind of conditional grant, I note parenthetically, was approved by this Court in Reference Re Canada Assistance Plan (B.C.), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 525, at p. 567.)

Look at people that vote for the Cons? They're here telling us that Trudeau is doing a bad job of managing the Provinces' responsibility. Thery want zero responsibility and have zero ideas. They're only contribution is "**** Trudeau" and they think this is policy.

Our province has got rid of significant revenues (Education Property Tax) with no plan for funding education in a bid to buy votes with public funds then misused Federal funds they have been given. Next they spend public funds for advertising to blame the feds for a healthcare crisis. I honestly don't know how more people don't see through the B.S. They've given up significant funds, mainly given by the most wealthy in the province, and now need to use other funds to fund one of their biggest expenditures (Education). I still can't see how they can campaign as fiscally responsible.

Premiers want money and no oversight, shocking! Absolutely shocking I tell you!

Under the Canada Health Act, they can withhold funding if conditions in the health act are not met. Constitution FYI says nothing about funding.

The rank and file Trump supporters have not realized that every dollar he has grifted from the US treasury/IRS is a dollar that has been taken from them.

Dalton worked out for Arizona and Minnesota with more to come according to 3DNation.

Just so we are on the same page, can you give a few examples of the "hard turns to left"? I am trying to understand your point of view. Sorry- it was about the health care funds. Also, funtcionaly- The liberals would have a minority government every single time- the NDP would prop them up, very time over the cons. So, No- I am not wrong in that. Interestingly enough- all those graphs show a clear left of center preference for Canadians.

I literally did, 3 hours ago.

Which we should have had in 2005. Thank the Cons and NDP for bringing down the Paul Martin government. The 2005 Canadian Federal Budget during the premiership of Paul Martin, included CA$5 billion over five years for a national day care program similar to Québec's child care system.[12] The federal and provincial governments signed bilateral agreements "Moving Forward on Early Learning and Child Care". This allowed individual provinces to access the new federal funding.[13] Both Saskatchewan and Manitoba signed agreements through which they committed to expanding only in the non-profit sector. Ontario did not.[13] In 2005, the Ontario Coalition for Better Child Care, said that there needs to be support for "more and better before and after school learning and care opportunities for children 6-12". The Coalition also noted that the agreement was not binding on Ontario in regards to additional funding from the province to child care. Without both federal and provincial funding, longer-term child care is unsustainable in Ontario.[13] When Stephen Harper won the 2006 Canadian federal election, the new government eliminated the bilateral agreements on child care as their first act of power.

Good for him! Sucks for us. I wish him the best and hope he gets a fair shake.

You're sounding a bit desperate, like Rider fans hoping to snag that last playoff spot through the cross-over despite tanking their season down the backstretch, any loophole will do. You fail to acknowledge how unpalatable the current version of the CPC has become to most Canadians, so hope is all you got.

It was only a matter of time... he'll get his shot.

Heh- love it:

Of course the Con Premiers will piss and moan. It's al they have. And, failed leadership. And crypto coins.

Not a fact. There are different kinds of electoral reform: Proportional Representation, Ranked Balloting etc. Even under PR, the Cons would not have had enough seats to form a coalition with 1/3 of the seats. You must have missed this from a few minutes ago (I'll put it in red so you notice this time): Excluding pandemic costs, the province spent $7.08 billion on health care in 2021-22. That’s an increase of $520 million from the $6.56 billion the province spent in 2017-18 — an average annual increase of only 1.9 per cent. It’s a stingy amount that falls well short of addressing chronic hospital understaffing, long wait lists and a severe doctor shortage, particularly in rural Manitoba. It’s especially inadequate given the province’s aging population, which is putting increased pressure on hospitals, home care and personal-care homes. Ms. Stefanson blames the federal government for that funding shortfall. However, during the same period, health-care transfers from Ottawa to Manitoba increased on average 3.8 per cent a year, bringing the federal contribution to $1.57 billion in 2021-22. That does not include additional federal funding for pandemic relief. It also doesn’t include the $900-million annual boost in equalization payments Manitoba received from Ottawa during that period.

From today's Free Press editorial: Excluding pandemic costs, the province spent $7.08 billion on health care in 2021-22. That’s an increase of $520 million from the $6.56 billion the province spent in 2017-18 — an average annual increase of only 1.9 per cent. It’s a stingy amount that falls well short of addressing chronic hospital understaffing, long wait lists and a severe doctor shortage, particularly in rural Manitoba. It’s especially inadequate given the province’s aging population, which is putting increased pressure on hospitals, home care and personal-care homes. Ms. Stefanson blames the federal government for that funding shortfall. However, during the same period, health-care transfers from Ottawa to Manitoba increased on average 3.8 per cent a year, bringing the federal contribution to $1.57 billion in 2021-22. That does not include additional federal funding for pandemic relief. It also doesn’t include the $900-million annual boost in equalization payments Manitoba received from Ottawa during that period. Instead of using that funding and other own-source revenues to provide the health-care system with adequate funding, the Tories cut taxes as part of their “$2,020 tax rollback guarantee.” According to Finance Minister Cameron Friesen, total tax cuts since 2016 are worth over $1.1 billion a year.

fixed for accuracy. I swear every time pp, hears anyone saying **** Trudeau or anything disparaging towards JT, he's all:

Pierre Pollievre's ears are burning...

She is absolutely terrible. I'd rather hear a bunch of dogs bark the anthem.

Morning Big Wood...I'll show myself out.

Wish we had a 'I hope you're right' emoticon.

You can't take results from an election under one rule and apply it to a different sort of election anyway. Further to that does it really matter if the liberals or conservatives have a minority? They still have to find support across the aisle somewhere to get anything passed.

As easy as it is to succumb to fatalism and cynicism of the glacial progress of Garland's DOJ, I continue to believe that the mills of the gods grind exceeding slow but they grind exceeding fine. The fate of the American justice system, the trust that Americans have (perhaps naively) in their justice system and even their government may well hang on the next few months. This shattering of confidence serves the ends of fascism and may be what the GOP wants.

Since January 6th 2022 (and one could argue well before this time), he has not stopped inciting violence, lying, cheating, grifting, stalling the justice system on multiple fronts, breaking multiple laws and pointedly saying the election needs to be overturned and he needs to be re-instated as the President of the United States. While Merrick Garland does what sorry? And then to hear from some, sure he's bad, do Biden next. Can we just finish with him first please then we will move on to the next?! It feels literally like watching a person of influence and status over a continued long period of time repeatedly rob banks in broad daylight while the DOJ tells us no one is above the law, due process is needed and everyone is innocent until proven guilty. Just when I think I've succumbed to being numb to the realization of some are in fact above the law, the feeling of anger and frustration comes in hot out of no where.

They are not withholding funding... they are simply saying that if the provinces want additional funding then it comes with assurances about how it is spent. Like seriously why can alberta cry poor when they have a surplus? Someone posted manitobas spending on healthcare same deal.

For me, this comes down to what has already passed. We know the PCs were given money to help with Covid (i think that's what it was for..the 85 mil) and we have zero knowledge of what happened to it. Even after they've been asked, nothing. Similar things happened with Daycare and education. Daycare I know the prov gave the payments to the centres...instead of investing in actually making daycare cheaper all the time. Don't get me wrong, I've benefitted THIS month because of what the PCs did. (I didn't have to pay this month) but I would have preferred to pay this month knowing that in the next year or so, daycare costs would be coming down. PCs had also been given money to help with school infastructure...essentially to update it especially the ventilation...again..what happened with it? So my question is...if the Feds are giving provinces money for specific things, and the provinces aren't using it for those things or only using part of it...or using it for those things but not in the intended way. AND the provinces are then turning around and pointing the finger at the feds for the problems those funds were supposed to address. When does it become reasonable to want a solidified plan in place before more money is given out?

Wow.

The ndp in Alberta started a pilot program which was wildly successful and they had plans to expand it but it was one of the first things the UCP cut when they took power. Guess which government is now running ads about how they are making life more affordable for albertans and touting early child care funding.... disgusting.

Whispering 'but stays a Bomber for life, carves out a nice career in the CFL, enjoys a few GC rings and see's his name up in the rafters'.

The liberal child care plan has been the single biggest benefit any government has given to me. So yay for that. Money directly in my pocket.

as an immigrant to the USA I am of two minds about this: 1. yeah, you can't have a government unless you can collect taxes, dummy. the US federal government spends money as stupidly as any other trillion-dollar organization, but it pays for medicare, medicaid, social security, infrastructure, weather safety, food safety, javelin missiles for Ukraine -- lots of good ****. there is value in those tax dollars. 2. American tax law is so jacked up that you can buy your way free of taxes with the right help. Many wealthy Americans will happily pay their accountants $100K to avoid a $101K tax bill. So is the extra IRS enforcement going to help mitigate these structural issues and make the wealthy pay their fair share? Or is the burden of the extra attention going to fall on the smaller fry?

I find it curiously interesting that during the discussion on the pandemic benefits and how that was just handed out with very little over sight and "with out putting strings" on them. yet here you are advocating that Trudeau do exactly that- no strings, no oversight... It's like he's damn if he does or damned if he doesn't with you... I think you just suffer from TDS... And to hell with you for making me defend Trudeau. 😄

Which is why Alberta has yet to completely privatize health care.

You're acting petulant, though. And you made numerous claims without any evidence whatsoever. That's also not a fact. Arguing in bad faith is akin to trolling and does nothing to benefit discourse in this thread.

7PM, TSN3 14-15-2 vs. 20-10-1 Bucky out with a non-covid illness Hopefully the boys are refreshed. They play another back to back this thurs/fri.

Winter storms are back — and scientists say climate change is making them a lot worse As winter storms continue to pummel much of the United States, is climate change partially — or majorly — to blame? As with any natural disaster that relates to the weather, it is natural to wonder whether climate change plays a role. Certainly the weather this winter has been extreme, with Texans and Oklahomans being warned of potential tornadoes and Americans everywhere bracing for possible power outages (which on their own can be devastating). Winter storms mean blocked roads, damaged property, crumbling infrastructure and possibly even injuries and deaths. The big question for both policymakers and the public, therefore, is how much of the horrid weather can be definitively attributed to global warming. Climate change experts say that it's not merely a coincidence — climate change really is worsening our winter storms this year, as multiples experts told Salon. "Winter storms develop in a climate change environment: it is warmer and moister," Kevin Trenberth of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) told Salon by email. "But it is plenty cold in winter over the continent. It means snow amounts can be much greater: e.g. see Buffalo recently. They may be more intense: not guaranteed, but more developments ensue. Watch for a bad nor-easter." While it may seem counterintuitive to attribute more snow to the planet warming, Trenberth observed that this only seems to be the case because the general public is insufficiently informed about how climate change works. "[People need] education that winter warming may mean more snow, not less," Trenberth added. This does not mean that scientists can precisely quantify the extent to which climate change has played a role. According to Dr. Michael E. Mann — a climate scientist and director of the Center for Science, Sustainability and the Media at the University of Pennsylvania — it is "tricky" to figure these things out with precision. "There's still quite a bit of debate about whether we can expect more events like the Texas cold spell last year due to climate change," Mann wrote to Salon. "On the other hand, there is evidence that warming leads to more powerful, snowier nor'easters—something we've seen quite a bit of in the northeast in recent years." https://www.salon.com/2022/12/17/winter-storms-are-back-and-scientists-say-climate-change-is-making-them-a-lot-worse/

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/P-25.2/page-1.html

This does not compute. Chretien / Martin and Harper all cut social transfers. Trudeau was the PM who increased them again.

Albert's has a surplus! Why do we need to go hat in hand to the feds for health care money when we should have some of our own? This is exactly why Trudeau won't write a cheque without some assurance it will be pissed away. And I for one agree with him. Provinces want the feds to bail them out of their messes the feds should have some say I where that money goes. Only fair if these self-serving premiers are going to use the federal government as the punching bag for the problems.

There is never going to be a team in Atlantic Canada. Those provincial governments are broke and are not going to fund a stadium. No ownership group either. Time to move on.

Provs can put in their own taxes for health care. Nothing is stopping them. Since Provs keep lapsing healthcare funds, maybe they should explain why first? (We know why... privatization - under fund, then say you can't keep up, sell it off. That's the right wing mentality.)

While health care is a provincial responsibility, since the federal government has more ability to raise revenue and to ensure relatively equal levels of care across Canada, the federal government has always played a role in healthcare ever since it was introduced in the 1960s. As for withholding funds, Trudeau wanting to put strings before committing $ is reasonable since provincial governments have not used healthcare money for healthcare and are crying poor (see Ontario and Alberta as examples). Heck, they were doing the same thing with Covid funds (see Manitoba getting 85 million for education during covid and spending 10 million on a remote learning center and not accounting for the other 75 million).

Why should I as a Manitoban who pays a provincial sales tax be happy for Alberta to get additional no-strings attached health care funding when they refuse to raise their own funds through taxation? Why should I be happy for Ontario to get no-strings attached health care funding when Ford disappeared $4.5 billion in COVID funding? Why shouldn't we all expect our provinces to be more accountable with their healthcare dollars? Who else is going to hold them accountable?

Ambrosie says "we wanted to do this game to show our friends on the east coast that they're important"......... me: "So, you're gonna force 'em to watch Toronto and Saskatchewan play??" **** what a shitty game this will be...

There is simple ignorance, not knowing, and willful ignorance that refuses to know, that covers the light of knowledge with the dark blanket of bias. Elizabeth Moon

This is what a persecution complex paired with cognitive dissonance looks like. Maybe?

Someone has some splaining to do at the irs.