iso_55 Posted February 22, 2016 Report Share Posted February 22, 2016 No, don't do that. I just don't understand why people get worked up over what names that fans put on their jerseys. Enough to mock or set up a website dedicated to doing just that. In regards to the Jets there are no classic jerseys you can buy from the WHA or NHL 1.0 era at their stores so if I put Hull 9 on a current Jets jersey it's not because I want to, it's because I have no choice. It's still my choice what I do. BTW, I do have a Jets away jersey that I bought in 2011 when the announcement was made that the Thrashers were moving to Winnipeg. It's a Hawerchuk jersey from the 80's. Looks authentic in every way. Only wear it occasionally. If I ever get to a Jets home game I'll be sure to wear it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iso_55 Posted February 22, 2016 Report Share Posted February 22, 2016 3 hours ago, Taynted_Fayth said: not gonna lie everytime the coyotes are on TV at home and they mention shane doan passing his franchise point mark and showing the Hawerchuck name hanging in their building, i kinda wanna go kick something It took Doan how long??? The comparison is a a joke. As far as kicking something, I hear ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iso_55 Posted February 22, 2016 Report Share Posted February 22, 2016 3 hours ago, ALuCsRED said: Except the Jets are still called the Jets, and the Wild are not called the North Stars (or stars) What would you do in the case of the Cleveland Browns? Man, the guy turned 80. saw him on the NFL Network. What a great Baltimore Raven he was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALuCsRED Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 8 hours ago, TrueBlue said: The fact that they are still called the Jets is irrelevant when discussing this IMO. Jets or not, Hawerchuk never played for our current hockey franchise. I'd consider the Cleveland Browns under a different light altogether because of the settlement they agreed on to to keep the city's history and team name when they were brought back into the NFL. The Jets had no agreement like this in place. Even if the Browns kept some sort of history, the former Cleveland players never played for the current Cleveland Browns franchise. Hawerchuk never played in Phoenix for Phoenix. How could they have any connection to him, Thomas Steen, Doug Smail, Pokey Reddick or Bobby Hull? Never. They were Winnipeg Jets and will always be part of Winnipeg hockey history. Having a Jets jersey with the 1.0 heros makes much more sense than that of a Kovalchuk, Heatley, Hossa, or Hedberg Jets jersey. iso_55 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iso_55 Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 4 minutes ago, ALuCsRED said: Even if the Browns kept some sort of history, the former Cleveland players never played for the current Cleveland Browns franchise. Hawerchuk never played in Phoenix for Phoenix. How could they have any connection to him, Thomas Steen, Doug Smail, Pokey Reddick or Bobby Hull? Never. They were Winnipeg Jets and will always be part of Winnipeg hockey history. Having a Jets jersey with the 1.0 heros makes much more sense than that of a Kovalchuk, Heatley, Hossa, or Hedberg Jets jersey. Exactly. Who cares about those Atlanta guys? But... if a Jet fan wants a Marian Hossa jersey that's their choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearpants Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 17 hours ago, Blueballz said: How is this even a thread? My god season can't get here fast enough... #SMH are you new here? 8 hours ago, ALuCsRED said: Having a Jets jersey with the 1.0 heros makes much more sense than that of a Kovalchuk, Heatley, Hossa, or Hedberg Jets jersey. Good point... I should get a Heatley jersey... except it will say #50in07... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan007 Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 18 hours ago, IC Khari said: 7 pages of nothing ... the Seinfeld Thread! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALuCsRED Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 We'd probably have 4 pages of substance if Blueballz and Logan007 quit posting and complaining about nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan007 Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 2 hours ago, ALuCsRED said: We'd probably have 4 pages of substance if Blueballz and Logan007 quit posting and complaining about nothing. bearpants and SPuDS 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duchkal2 Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 Why are we talking about having the proper players on the proper franchise when The Bombers have ALWAYS been in Winnipeg? Maybe if we are talking about the Baltimore Stallions vs Montreal Allouettes I guess but not the Winnipeg Jets 1.0 vs 2.0. This is not the thread to do so. This is a football page not hockey. Take it where it's appropriate. That being said, the old Jets are NOT the new Jets. 1.0 belongs to the Coyotes and the Thrasher history belongs to Jets 2.0. It'll be interesting what the heritage jerseys will look like. Will they go Thrasher cause I doubt the Coyotes will give up trademark of old Jets logo. But who knows... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IC Khari Posted February 23, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 (edited) Back to new CFL unis ... as mentioned, if the new threads are out in May and they are the classic design, I wonder if the team will eventually go to a third jersey. The mid 2000's gold jersey (trimmed in Royal Blue instead of Navy of course) would be OK with me if they ever decided to do that. Edited February 23, 2016 by IC Khari Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 I'd mentioned this earlier in the thread, but I actually liked these Gold's.....soooooo much better than the brown things they're calling gold now. SPuDS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Duchkal2 said: Why are we talking about having the proper players on the proper franchise when The Bombers have ALWAYS been in Winnipeg? Maybe if we are talking about the Baltimore Stallions vs Montreal Allouettes I guess but not the Winnipeg Jets 1.0 vs 2.0. This is not the thread to do so. This is a football page not hockey. Take it where it's appropriate. That being said, the old Jets are NOT the new Jets. 1.0 belongs to the Coyotes and the Thrasher history belongs to Jets 2.0. It'll be interesting what the heritage jerseys will look like. Will they go Thrasher cause I doubt the Coyotes will give up trademark of old Jets logo. But who knows... When the Jets moved to Phoenix, the old Jets logo became property of the NHL. When True North bought the Thrashers, they also bought the rights to the old logo. I'm pretty sure the heritage jersey will either be the logo the Jets had when they left or the old WHA logo. No way it is the Thrashers logo. True North would sell a ton of old Jets Jerseys. They'd be lucky if they sold 10 Thrashers jerseys. comedygeek 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noeller Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 It will absolutely be the Jets 1.0 logo....they're not stupid. ALuCsRED 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpan85 Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 Remember when people said they would never be called the Jets because nobody would buy new jerseys hats tshirts etc because they already had 1.0 gear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCon Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 According to Google, we do get thrashers in southern Manitoba during summer breeding season. I wonder what a Thrashers jersey, in Jets 1.0 colours would look like? (I'm not suggesting they should do this and they certainly won't) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbbfan Posted February 24, 2016 Report Share Posted February 24, 2016 Please can we just have the retro uni's full time. PRETTY PLEASE! the last few years have been brutal enough just give us this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iso_55 Posted February 24, 2016 Report Share Posted February 24, 2016 20 hours ago, wbbfan said: Please can we just have the retro uni's full time. PRETTY PLEASE! the last few years have been brutal enough just give us this one. Fans have been waiting for the Bombers to do the same thing with their jerseys, go back to the classic look. I'll take the Bombers for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Pop Posted February 24, 2016 Report Share Posted February 24, 2016 On 2/23/2016 at 4:20 PM, JCon said: According to Google, we do get thrashers in southern Manitoba during summer breeding season. I wonder what a Thrashers jersey, in Jets 1.0 colours would look like? (I'm not suggesting they should do this and they certainly won't) The funniest thing is that even before the move of ATL, we had a Winnipeg Thrashers team with the same logo - and still do. Winnipeg Thrashers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iso_55 Posted February 24, 2016 Report Share Posted February 24, 2016 How long have they been called the Thrashers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IC Khari Posted February 24, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2016 17 minutes ago, iso_55 said: How long have they been called the Thrashers? Dale Weise, Mark and Michael Stone all played for the Thrashers so they've been around awhile ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALuCsRED Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 42 minutes ago, iso_55 said: How long have they been called the Thrashers? Winnipeg Thrashers since 2004. Previously the Winnipeg Sharks. As for the Thrashers name and history, wikipedia states: "True North stated that the announcement of the team's name would not be made until after the successful completion of the season ticket drive at the absolute earliest.[20] The team was not to be named the Thrashers, since True North did not acquire the name in the transaction, and the rights to that name and the Thrashers logo were retained by the ownership group in Atlanta.[21]" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iso_55 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 16 minutes ago, ALuCsRED said: Winnipeg Thrashers since 2004. Previously the Winnipeg Sharks. As for the Thrashers name and history, wikipedia states: "True North stated that the announcement of the team's name would not be made until after the successful completion of the season ticket drive at the absolute earliest.[20] The team was not to be named the Thrashers, since True North did not acquire the name in the transaction, and the rights to that name and the Thrashers logo were retained by the ownership group in Atlanta.[21]" Maybe the NHL hasn't totally given up on Atlanta in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearpants Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 Thrashers would have been an appropriate name for a Manitoba team... the logo could be something along these lines... IC Khari and Fatty Liver 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taynted_Fayth Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 lol isnt it thresher IC Khari and comedygeek 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now