Yourface Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 This was posted on TEP... Don't know where else to put it. Darrin Bauming@DarrinBauming Robert Marve just told me he wants to make it clear he wants to remain in the CFL and in Winnipeg. He doesn't have NFL aspirations next year Ed Tait @WFPEdTait Interesting. Was apparently off an extension in Dec and turned it down. Club told by his agent he wanted to try NFL. I suppose he realized he wouldn't have much of a chance in the NFL and changed his mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbill2004 Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yourface Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis. I highly doubt it. He's shown enough potential that he's certainly worth keeping around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBlink Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now. Yourface and Blueandgold 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now. Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent. I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBlink Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now.Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent.I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice. And Portis was downright not very good from my vantage point. Inconsistent beats out consistently not very good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yourface Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now. Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent. I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice. Inconsistent maybe, but he was still more effective than anyone not named Willy. 6.9 yards per play in which he was involved and 14 points scored overall. No matter how you look at it, Marve has been able to move the offense and put points on the board on a consistent basis. It would be absolutely foolish to cut the guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBlink Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Marve had a couple very impressive runs and a TD pass. Showed me enough that he can contribute and continue to be the exciting player that he is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan007 Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now. Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent. I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice. Inconsistent maybe, but he was still more effective than anyone not named Willy. 6.9 yards per play in which he was involved and 14 points scored overall. No matter how you look at it, Marve has been able to move the offense and put points on the board on a consistent basis. It would be absolutely foolish to cut the guy. You remind me of Roadgriller and his fetish for Goltz. BTW I'm not saying Marve is anything like Goltz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yourface Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now. Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent. I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice. Inconsistent maybe, but he was still more effective than anyone not named Willy. 6.9 yards per play in which he was involved and 14 points scored overall. No matter how you look at it, Marve has been able to move the offense and put points on the board on a consistent basis. It would be absolutely foolish to cut the guy. You remind me of Roadgriller and his fetish for Goltz. BTW I'm not saying Marve is anything like Goltz. Except Roadgriller had ZERO stats to back up his love for Goltz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrg Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Would make about as much sense as cutting Ian Wild and Johnny Sears before the start of the last season. Or any player with one year left on their contract. How did this get from zero to stupid so fast? bearpants 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlue Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis. So you're in favour of cutting a guy just because he didn't sign a contract extension? Mark F 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbill2004 Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis. So you're in favour of cutting a guy just because he didn't sign a contract extension? There's some logic there, for a 3rd string developmental roster spot. If it were a starting or backup spot, I might have a different opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milt Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now. Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent. I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice. Inconsistent maybe, but he was still more effective than anyone not named Willy. 6.9 yards per play in which he was involved and 14 points scored overall. No matter how you look at it, Marve has been able to move the offense and put points on the board on a consistent basis. It would be absolutely foolish to cut the guy. You remind me of Roadgriller and his fetish for Goltz. BTW I'm not saying Marve is anything like Goltz. He might be inconsistent but he did some things and was more effective than the other back ups so let's not cut the guy you have a very low bar for what you deem a fetish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark F Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Brian Brohm Interview http://www.bluebombers.com/video/index/id/111057 Drew Willy Interview http://ow.ly/i/bgiBf willy interview just a photo of Drew. no interview. great interview with Brohm. He seems really smart, confident. thanks for the links Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now. Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent. I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice. Inconsistent maybe, but he was still more effective than anyone not named Willy. 6.9 yards per play in which he was involved and 14 points scored overall. No matter how you look at it, Marve has been able to move the offense and put points on the board on a consistent basis. It would be absolutely foolish to cut the guy. You remind me of Roadgriller and his fetish for Goltz. BTW I'm not saying Marve is anything like Goltz. He might be inconsistent but he did some things and was more effective than the other back ups so let's not cut the guyyou have a very low bar for what you deem a fetish No, actually, I can see where Logan is going with that statement. Seems to me it's far too early to be gushing about a 3rd stringer at this point. Logan007 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlue Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis. So you're in favour of cutting a guy just because he didn't sign a contract extension? There's some logic there, for a 3rd string developmental roster spot. If it were a starting or backup spot, I might have a different opinion. I disagree. It's irrelevant that he didn't sign a contract back in December. I'm sure Osh couldn't care one way or the other that he's playing out this year. All that matters to him is that he progressing along, and making plays and moving the chains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yourface Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 As it stands cutting Marve in favour of Portis would be a terrible football decision. Marve is much better right now. Is he? I didn't watch the game but people who were watching the stream said he was inconsistent. I trust the coaching staff whatever they do will be the right choice. Inconsistent maybe, but he was still more effective than anyone not named Willy. 6.9 yards per play in which he was involved and 14 points scored overall. No matter how you look at it, Marve has been able to move the offense and put points on the board on a consistent basis. It would be absolutely foolish to cut the guy. You remind me of Roadgriller and his fetish for Goltz. BTW I'm not saying Marve is anything like Goltz. He might be inconsistent but he did some things and was more effective than the other back ups so let's not cut the guyyou have a very low bar for what you deem a fetish No, actually, I can see where Logan is going with that statement. Seems to me it's far too early to be gushing about a 3rd stringer at this point. Fact is Marve should be the backup. Is the objective in football not to move the chains and put points on the board? Marve has been able to do so effectively and on a consistent basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark F Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Would make about as much sense as cutting Ian Wild and Johnny Sears before the start of the last season. Or any player with one year left on their contract. How did this get from zero to stupid so fast? it didn't start at zero. started pretty close to stupid. GCJenks, Yourface and Mr Dee 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbill2004 Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis.So you're in favour of cutting a guy just because he didn't sign a contract extension?There's some logic there, for a 3rd string developmental roster spot. If it were a starting or backup spot, I might have a different opinion. I disagree. It's irrelevant that he didn't sign a contract back in December. I'm sure Osh couldn't care one way or the other that he's playing out this year. All that matters to him is that he progressing along, and making plays and moving the chains. That's cool. We don't need to agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Fact is Marve should be the backup. Is the objective in football not to move the chains and put points on the board? Marve has been able to do so effectively and on a consistent basis. See, that's where your obsession rears up, when you say "fact is". Fact is, he's the #3 QB and will stay #3 until he progresses to the point that the Coaching Staff deems he is capable to be everything a backup QB needs to be. I'd love to see packages specially designed for his skill set and from there if he progresses...good on him. But I have more faith in Brohm as the situation stands. That's my opinion, and in fact, it's the way it is right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis. So you're in favour of cutting a guy just because he didn't sign a contract extension? Pay no mind to him, he hitched his fan wagon to Portis a while back and wants to be vindicated for that it seems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbill2004 Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Marve better sign a contract extension soon or he could be cut in favour of Portis. So you're in favour of cutting a guy just because he didn't sign a contract extension? Pay no mind to him, he hitched his fan wagon to Portis a while back and wants to be vindicated for that it seems. I said Portis looked good in a couple practices. I haven't hitched my wagon to anyone. Where do you guys come up with these assumptions??I've explained my logic here. Not saying Marve will be cut, but there's a strong case to support that decision. Adrenaline_x 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DR. CFL Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 I'm more concerned about 4 QB s throwing for a combined 160yds passing vs a team that threw for 350 yds passing. Is this an early warning of last years passing production? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IC Khari Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 I'm more concerned about 4 QB s throwing for a combined 160yds passing vs a team that threw for 350 yds passing. Is this an early warning of last years passing production? bearpants 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now