Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, johnzo said:

Concoran really struggled blocking tonight.  His man totally blew up a promising looking sweep play in the 1st half and then he got caught blocking towards his endzone and aborted a drive. 

Sheed is out of football, right? 

One reason why they brought him onto the roster in favour of Mitchell was because “he did the dirty stuff” and blocks on run plays.
 

My immediate reaction watching that and a number of other plays unfold was: Would help if he did that **** well.

Posted

Everyone making Dillon Mitchell out to be some stud receiver is I think fooling themselves. His best season he had just over 700 yards. I mean. It’s not like he’s some stud. Honestly. Him and sterns have similar numbers in their career. 

Posted

MOS on the pre game was talking about how Corcoran does all the dirty work well, how he's a hard worker etc and I kept thinking that's the MOS MO, Hard working, does the little things guy, talent doesn't always factor in see The Marine.

They also say they don't want to move Wheatfall, so can he only play 1 spot. Wheatfall has about 115 yards in the past 4 games so its not like he's lighting it up.

Posted

Wheatfall's struggles are married to ZC struggles... if you're a burner who runs deep, dont have much thrown to you when your QB can reliably throw 20 yards or under.

Also fun fact: We have not lost when Streveler is our starting QB this year 🤣

Posted
1 hour ago, Goalie said:

Everyone making Dillon Mitchell out to be some stud receiver is I think fooling themselves. His best season he had just over 700 yards. I mean. It’s not like he’s some stud. Honestly. Him and sterns have similar numbers in their career. 

He put up near that amount in only 9 games as a rookie.  The potential is (or at least was) there, he's just never gotten back to that level. Don't know if he'll ever get back to that but we certainly won't know if he doesn't get a chance.

Posted
1 hour ago, Goalie said:

Everyone making Dillon Mitchell out to be some stud receiver is I think fooling themselves. His best season he had just over 700 yards. I mean. It’s not like he’s some stud. Honestly. Him and sterns have similar numbers in their career. 

Then why did we pay him like a stud receiver? You keep missing that part of this equation.

I don’t think anyone here is clamouring for the use of Dillon Mitchell because we’re all long term members of his fan club. I think most of us are confused as to why we paid 150k annually to a guy who is turning out to be the 9th (at best) receiver on our depth chart.

Posted
1 hour ago, Goalie said:

Everyone making Dillon Mitchell out to be some stud receiver is I think fooling themselves. His best season he had just over 700 yards. I mean. It’s not like he’s some stud. Honestly. Him and sterns have similar numbers in their career. 

It's not that people think he’s a stud, it's that he's shown some potential and we signed him early in the offseason and our receivers blow. So we want to see what a guy like that can do.

Posted

Like:

Vaval...coaches patience well rewarded,  2TD returns probably the difference, tonight 

DL......the most disruptive game,  we have seen from this group

Streveler.......2 and 0 as the starting QB

No like:

Hogan........guy should be shipped off to a POW camp.  Stupid play call after stupid play call.

Bonds......useless, inept....... one man wrecking crew, for opposing teams... GET RID OF HIM!!

Receivers........bottom tier of this group, just not good enough.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Goalie said:

Everyone making Dillon Mitchell out to be some stud receiver is I think fooling themselves. His best season he had just over 700 yards. I mean. It’s not like he’s some stud. Honestly. Him and sterns have similar numbers in their career. 

We're basically not dressing a full compliment of receivers right now but dressing Cooley to show the world he has no ability to catch kicks and nothing else....while we have a backup Canadian who can do that and more in street clothes on the sideline.

Posted (edited)

Oh I don’t disagree. There’s obviously something going on there with Mitchell tho. Perhaps personality clashes. Why not release? I feel he will be without ever playing a snap. But prob cuz don’t want to admit they made a mistake. Are the receivers that bad or is it the play calling cuz Wheatfall and Demski have put up numbers. (In individual games) Sterns seems to be a consistent player. Streveler threw 1 pass over 20 yards and it was to Demski so the receivers numbers not gonna be great obviously. While I don’t think Streveler is the answer or Zach for that matter, it’s pretty obvious the OC has no clue.  And if you take emotions out of it, outside of 1 game vs Edmonton and 1 half vs BC, our QBs have sucked  

 

1. Willie -  best game in years but I think I’ll give Assists to Person Vaughters Adams Lawson also. 
 

2  Vaval- last time a bomber returned 2 kicks in a game was probably Janerion Grants debut probably 

3  Demski  our only threat on O really  

 

HH  Sheehan with another good game  

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Goalie
Posted
10 hours ago, 17to85 said:

Need a change on the interior of the OL. I dunno which one first but someone.... need some receivers other than Demski who can make a play. Stearns is OK but not a top 2 type guy. Need some play calls that work with what they have... so yeah there's problems on O. Mitchell sits for this? aye yi yi. 

Eli in at centre.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...