Bombers at Stumps GDT

[Noeller]

35 minutes ago, Goalie said:

The repeat stuff thread. 

That's every thread. "This team, and all who run it, absolutely sucks and here's why" ad nauseum (or is it Add Nausea?)

[17to85]

39 minutes ago, Noeller said:

That's every thread. "This team, and all who run it, absolutely sucks and here's why" ad nauseum (or is it Add Nausea?)

Well then .maybe the team should be perfect and win every game 60-0?

[Noeller]

25 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Well then .maybe the team should be perfect and win every game 60-0?

Can't it just be 2022 regular season every year???

[rebusrankin]

37 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Well then .maybe the team should be perfect and win every game 60-0?

Only 60 per game? No negative point totals for the opposition? Lowered expectations, man.

[Booch]

1 hour ago, 17to85 said:

Well then .maybe the team should be perfect and win every game 60-0?

if anything...learn from past losses....and why....and adjust/change things.......and not repeat it....continually.....easy concept most coaches grasp.....most

[Captain Blue]

Just to point out, there are the same folks over and over pointing out how Osh won't move on from anyone.

This is not actually correct. Even just this past year we moved on from three major parts of the defense - Bighill, Alexander and Ford. The idea that they don't get rid of aging vets when they did not re-sign two guys who helped transform and start this era of success is completely overlooked. 

You can argue he didn't get rid of the right guys or enough players, and that's fine. But I laugh at the idea that Osh is too loyal to move on from guys like Jake Thomas when he's letting go of Adam Bighill. The reason Thomas is on the team, for instance, is that Osh views his performance differently than say someone else here. And that's fine! You can criticize him for that if you are unhappy with literally any player that is getting playing time. 

Looping back every discussion to the same issue (as if it's always just one thing) merely subtracts from the football discussion on the board. 

[HardCoreBlue]

22 minutes ago, Captain Blue said:

Just to point out, there are the same folks over and over pointing out how Osh won't move on from anyone.

This is not actually correct. Even just this past year we moved on from three major parts of the defense - Bighill, Alexander and Ford. The idea that they don't get rid of aging vets when they did not re-sign two guys who helped transform and start this era of success is completely overlooked. 

You can argue he didn't get rid of the right guys or enough players, and that's fine. But I laugh at the idea that Osh is too loyal to move on from guys like Jake Thomas when he's letting go of Adam Bighill. The reason Thomas is on the team, for instance, is that Osh views his performance differently than say someone else here. And that's fine! You can criticize him for that if you are unhappy with literally any player that is getting playing time. 

Looping back every discussion to the same issue (as if it's always just one thing) merely subtracts from the football discussion on the board. 

Who is pointing out over and over again that MOS doesn’t move on from anybody? I’m confused. I haven’t seen that. And you laughing at the loyalty for certain players makes me think you may not be paying attention to what MOS has said about certain  longstanding BB players. 

Edited 12 hours ago by HardCoreBlue

[17to85]

1 hour ago, Captain Blue said:

But I laugh at the idea that Osh is too loyal to move on from guys like Jake Thomas when he's letting go of Adam Bighill.

But was that osh or did walters take that one out of coaches hands? Cause let's be honest, if biggie was under contract oshea would 100% be playing him.

[bigg jay]

55 minutes ago, Captain Blue said:

Just to point out, there are the same folks over and over pointing out how Osh won't move on from anyone.

This is not actually correct. Even just this past year we moved on from three major parts of the defense - Bighill, Alexander and Ford. The idea that they don't get rid of aging vets when they did not re-sign two guys who helped transform and start this era of success is completely overlooked. 

You can argue he didn't get rid of the right guys or enough players, and that's fine. But I laugh at the idea that Osh is too loyal to move on from guys like Jake Thomas when he's letting go of Adam Bighill. The reason Thomas is on the team, for instance, is that Osh views his performance differently than say someone else here. And that's fine! You can criticize him for that if you are unhappy with literally any player that is getting playing time. 

Looping back every discussion to the same issue (as if it's always just one thing) merely subtracts from the football discussion on the board. 

They didn't move on from Ford, he walked away.  Biggie, I have no doubt, would still be here if he hadn't shredded his knee. He's still not healthy enough to play so that should have been a no brainer.  I'll give you BA but let's not pretend they had some big wholesale change planned. Those 3 are also at positions where we have depth so we could roll with guys we already had - the D Line has needed help for a while but we haven't seen a whole lot of movement.

It's also not just about moving on from older players, it's about how they are being used.  Thomas has absolutely no business being a starter taking tons of reps but here we are.  If he was being used sparingly as a backup, you'd see way less posts about him.  As much as I love WJ, it's plain to see that he should not be on the field as much as he is.

[Booch]

1 hour ago, Captain Blue said:

Just to point out, there are the same folks over and over pointing out how Osh won't move on from anyone.

This is not actually correct. Even just this past year we moved on from three major parts of the defense - Bighill, Alexander and Ford. The idea that they don't get rid of aging vets when they did not re-sign two guys who helped transform and start this era of success is completely overlooked. 

You can argue he didn't get rid of the right guys or enough players, and that's fine. But I laugh at the idea that Osh is too loyal to move on from guys like Jake Thomas when he's letting go of Adam Bighill. The reason Thomas is on the team, for instance, is that Osh views his performance differently than say someone else here. And that's fine! You can criticize him for that if you are unhappy with literally any player that is getting playing time. 

Looping back every discussion to the same issue (as if it's always just one thing) merely subtracts from the football discussion on the board. 

Ford was going to his brother's team...and out priced himself any way...so out of our hands there

Biggie...was hurt...and not gonna be ready....if not hurt....he was gonna be here...if Osh continues to roster Thomas..kolo..Scmeck....Wilson...Scmeck....you know damn well Biggie would have been here

BA...is maybe the only one we chose to move on from...did we low ball him tho like we did Jeffcoat?...quite possible...who knows

Just now, 17to85 said:

But was that osh or did walters take that one out of coaches hands? Cause let's be honest, if biggie was under contract oshea would 100% be playing him.

100 percent that was taken out of his hands....he wont be playing next week either...or week after I bet...9 months out...for an aged player...at his position?...nahhhh....and if he does try that soon....gonna really tarnish the last memories fans will have of him

[Booch]

1 minute ago, bigg jay said:

They didn't move on from Ford, he walked away.  Biggie, I have no doubt, would still be here if he hadn't shredded his knee. He's still not healthy enough to play so that should have been a no brainer.  I'll give you BA but let's not pretend they had some big wholesale change planned. Those 3 are also at positions where we have depth so we could roll with guys we already had - the D Line has needed help for a while but we haven't seen a whole lot of movement.

It's also not just about moving on from older players, it's about how they are being used.  Thomas has absolutely no business being a starter taking tons of reps but here we are.  If he was being used sparingly as a backup, you'd see way less posts about him.  As much as I love WJ, it's plain to see that he should not be on the field as much as he is.

dline has needed help since we lost Kongbo...Stove....Nevis...Sayles...even Hansen and we made it worse by low balling Jeffcoat into retirement....injury issues?...I call b.s on that as we continued to sign/play BA...Biggie...Grant (until we effed that up) Hallett...and others who were always walking wounded and missed chunks...Only reason why the other Hallett is gone is because he physically cant do it anymore

We of recent have some more than capable guys....but they play second fiddle to Osh's fav's....Even the strange decision to not re-up Fox and Garbutt was flawed and short sited as both playing well in Ham and would definately be helping here....likely tho they wanted to try free agency and actually get real playtime elsewhere...others have left here for that reason...a couple I also know alomost did but got talked into staying by some vets here

Guys who know they can play...wanna play....you can be the best team guy in the world but when you have to consistently take a back seat to an inferior coach's preference....you can only stomach it for so long

[Colin Unger]

34 minutes ago, bigg jay said:

They didn't move on from Ford, he walked away.  Biggie, I have no doubt, would still be here if he hadn't shredded his knee. He's still not healthy enough to play so that should have been a no brainer.  I'll give you BA but let's not pretend they had some big wholesale change planned. Those 3 are also at positions where we have depth so we could roll with guys we already had - the D Line has needed help for a while but we haven't seen a whole lot of movement.

It's also not just about moving on from older players, it's about how they are being used.  Thomas has absolutely no business being a starter taking tons of reps but here we are.  If he was being used sparingly as a backup, you'd see way less posts about him.  As much as I love WJ, it's plain to see that he should not be on the field as much as he is.

But these moves safe for Ford are in line with Walter’s plans to let a few move on per season rather than needing to replace them all at once.  There’s only a few left at this point

[Noeller]

2 minutes ago, Colin Unger said:

But these moves safe for Ford are in line with Walter’s plans to let a few move on per season rather than needing to replace them all at once.  There’s only a few left at this point

He was very open about how you can't do them all at once... Have to do a bit at a time. Now, having said that, nobody would argue that Jake should have been part of the purge by now.

[bigg jay]

33 minutes ago, Colin Unger said:

But these moves safe for Ford are in line with Walter’s plans to let a few move on per season rather than needing to replace them all at once.  There’s only a few left at this point

I've heard him say that but I don't know if I buy it.

Biggie's injury forced their hand at linebacker - even if they kept him, he's still out so a replacement was needed either way.  There's always turn over in the secondary (Alford, Rose, Houston for example) so moving on from BA & Ford just seems like regular occurrence rather than a plan.  And like I said, they already had internal replacements so it's pretty easy to do when you have 20 other guys to choose from. 

If there's a plan, why does it include leaving the DL so thin that we can barely spell off the few guys we do roster on gameday?

[Mike]

I don’t think there’s a lack of a plan. The plan just doesn’t make a ton of sense. 
 

We just completely re-configured our front office this offseason and added more bodies. What was the net effect? Our pro scouting highlighted guys who can’t crack our roster (J. Jones, Mitchell, etc) and our crop of recruits got us what … one new body? And the shine has worn off of him since he seems to be getting worse, not better?

Great.

What’s the draft plan? Okay, basically just draft guys to play special teams? Shay, Smith? Can’t give them D reps. Why would we?
 

What’s the roster plan? OL - washed. DL - gassed. LB - not versatile enough to fit our DC’s preference. WR - thin. Okay so what do we do to adjust?

What’s the coach’s plan? Doesn’t really seem to have one these days. Doesn’t affect much in-game. Our halftime adjustments seem invisible. The leash on underperformers is infinite. Won’t challenge anything. Won’t use the roster rules. And the overarching point everyone used to make - players would run through a wall for him? Do we see that drive out there anymore? I don’t.

[17to85]

2 hours ago, Mike said:

And the overarching point everyone used to make - players would run through a wall for him? Do we see that drive out there anymore? I don’t.

I think they still would... if they weren't gassed before they got to the wall. 

It's like I said before, too much complacency from the coach. I suspect a losing streak would alleviate that but as long as the team wins more than it loses it'll still be there. 

[MrFreakzilla]

The Bombers sometimes will remind me of the place I work.

This one guy has showed up 3 times in May, 4 Times in June and so far zero in July. Yet one day he'll come in and it will be like nothing has happened, as usual. Some managment groups only make changes when it is 100% necessary or the change is made for them. Otherwise they'll just ignore the problem.

Edited 5 hours ago by MrFreakzilla

[Booch]

9 hours ago, Mike said:

I don’t think there’s a lack of a plan. The plan just doesn’t make a ton of sense. 
 

We just completely re-configured our front office this offseason and added more bodies. What was the net effect? Our pro scouting highlighted guys who can’t crack our roster (J. Jones, Mitchell, etc) and our crop of recruits got us what … one new body? And the shine has worn off of him since he seems to be getting worse, not better?

Great.

What’s the draft plan? Okay, basically just draft guys to play special teams? Shay, Smith? Can’t give them D reps. Why would we?
 

What’s the roster plan? OL - washed. DL - gassed. LB - not versatile enough to fit our DC’s preference. WR - thin. Okay so what do we do to adjust?

What’s the coach’s plan? Doesn’t really seem to have one these days. Doesn’t affect much in-game. Our halftime adjustments seem invisible. The leash on underperformers is infinite. Won’t challenge anything. Won’t use the roster rules. And the overarching point everyone used to make - players would run through a wall for him? Do we see that drive out there anymore? I don’t.

couldnt have said it better....kinda hits nail on the head and now that the original core is aged...declining...some case not good enough...a couple never really were good enough, yet still play them like CFL Hall of Famers in their prime...well you get what you get

Used to be you had an outlier random stink bombe of a game....seemed  unprepared/unmotivated....but plenty of dominance games ....now you have random dominant game, which almost seems like the outlier game now....but more and more games of hot garbage, totally outcoached and looking unprepared....guys going through motions....and the coach with his ho hum attitude about it...reluctance to do anything diffeent or about it....and has that look on the sidelines that does not show any concern or anger about what he seeing...almost a confused befuddled....stunned look, and it's just status quo and look back at the past and assume it will show up again....and it won't more times than it will

Add in the fact we dont even give guys a chance doesnt help...Would JJones be better?....can Shay and Smith take reps in rotation to develop....sure be nice to see...Would Griffin be the better SAM....That right there is a definate yes.....sitting down Jake for a game or 2 and use the imports strictly with Lawson in the middle....would we be better....more productive?....pretty sure yup....would that hekp WJ and Vaughters...especially with a legit guy to rotate in....only a fool would think no.....so who is our fool?

and the biggest thing if these guys on our roster and PR are not god enough or have any ability or upside to get on the roster and make a difference...then why are they still here?

Edited 23 minutes ago by Booch