bigg jay Posted Monday at 06:36 PM Report Posted Monday at 06:36 PM 40 minutes ago, Bubba Zanetti said: 190 pound DE?!? Just put him on the FatBoi diet and he'll be tiptoeing up to the play in no time! 31 minutes ago, Booch said: pretty sure thats an oopsie.....dude dont look no 190 Yeah i think they just enter the height/weight for Williams twice (both listed as 6'1, 190). Most places have him listed at 6 or 6'1 and around 255. wbbfan, Tracker and Booch 1 1 1
17to85 Posted Monday at 06:41 PM Report Posted Monday at 06:41 PM 4 minutes ago, bigg jay said: Just put him on the FatBoi diet and he'll be tiptoeing up to the play in no time! Hey I can show a guy how to go from 190 to 235 easy. Did that over the course of a couple years in university. I call it the pizza and beer diet. HardCoreBlue, Tracker, Stickem and 4 others 2 4 1
bigg jay Posted Monday at 06:58 PM Report Posted Monday at 06:58 PM 16 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Hey I can show a guy how to go from 190 to 235 easy. Did that over the course of a couple years in university. I call it the pizza and beer diet. I am very well versed in this particular diet... Noeller, HardCoreBlue, Piggy 1 and 3 others 1 5
bigg jay Posted yesterday at 12:06 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:06 AM Another futures signing: https://www.bgmsportstrax.com/2025/10/06/winnipeg-blue-bombers-sign-offensive-lineman-sebastian-pares-to-a-future-contract/ bb1 1
Booch Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago be nice if we signed a current situation signing and inserted said signing...they are out there but when you have the mindset "we good" and the belief that things will just work...cause they so happened to do so 4...5 yrs ago.well you get a less than stellar roster that can compete...but not finish the deal Piggy 1, wbbfan and Blue-urns 3
Pete Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Booch said: be nice if we signed a current situation signing and inserted said signing...they are out there but when you have the mindset "we good" and the belief that things will just work...cause they so happened to do so 4...5 yrs ago.well you get a less than stellar roster that can compete...but not finish the deal Agree, BC hss done that and improved their dline a ton Edited 19 hours ago by Pete wbbfan 1
Goalie Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago (edited) 48 minutes ago, Pete said: Agree, BC hss done that and improved their dline a ton I go back to Demario Houston who was here with hall as DC and now Younger. Even Houston a vet admitted he needed a few weeks to get the terminology and schemes down. I would guess for a guy brand new to Canada never mind the cfl, it’s gonna take some time to get used to everything. I think our D scheme is a little more complex than BCs. BC spent money on betts and the DL and want the sacks. We seem to be content with just pressure and if we get a sack in the process, great. I feel some teams D live and die on sacks and pressure, ours ? Not so much. But then I see B.C. has given up 454 points through 16 games. Bombers 373 through 15. Weirdly enough riders given up the least. Then it’s us Calgary and Montreal at 373 through 15 games. BC actually well. Toronto has given up the most then BC then Hamilton then Ottawa. Then there’s a gap but Edmonton also over 400 points given up. Everyone else? Under Edited 18 hours ago by Goalie
17to85 Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 1 hour ago, Goalie said: We seem to be content with just pressure We don't get pressure though... Blue-urns, HardCoreBlue, wbbfan and 1 other 1 3
TBURGESS Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago What do the D stats look like over the last month? That's when BC finally started to play decent D.
JuranBoldenRules Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago (edited) 14 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: What do the D stats look like over the last month? That's when BC finally started to play decent D. The only QB's they've held under 25 points are Tre Ford, Montreal's 3rd and 4th stringers, Crum and Vernon Adams the past 3 weeks. Edited 17 hours ago by JuranBoldenRules Noeller, Blue-urns, Tracker and 1 other 3 1
rebusrankin Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago BC has an excellent offense and a pretty poor D. Bigblue204, bigg jay, Blue-urns and 1 other 1 3
TBURGESS Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago Last 4 weeks BC held CGY to 23 & 24, TOR to 22, and OTT to 27. Their big problem right now is the number of penalties they're taking.
HardCoreBlue Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 5 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: Last 4 weeks BC held CGY to 23 & 24, TOR to 22, and OTT to 27. Their big problem right now is the number of penalties they're taking. In summary, BC sucks? Yes I do indeed need new material. 🙂
Pete Catan's Ghost Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, HardCoreBlue said: In summary, BC sucks? Yes I do indeed need new material. While seemingly contradictory, redundancy and accuracy occurs in many contexts. You’re good. Edited 12 hours ago by Pete Catan's Ghost
Goalie Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 5 hours ago, 17to85 said: We don't get pressure though... But our D has allowed 70 less points in the same number of games. Sacks and pressure is nice but doesn’t lead to points not being scored against.
rebusrankin Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 2 hours ago, HardCoreBlue said: In summary, BC sucks? Yes I do indeed need new material. 🙂 Nothing wrong with the classics.
TBURGESS Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago BC puts up 30 points a game, so they can afford to allow 29 and still win.
17to85 Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 4 hours ago, Goalie said: But our D has allowed 70 less points in the same number of games. Sacks and pressure is nice but doesn’t lead to points not being scored against. So imagine if we could get pressure how good the D would be. Piggy 1 1
Mark H. Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 16 minutes ago, 17to85 said: So imagine if we could get pressure how good the D would be. One area where we have to give credit where credit is due: the Bombers management has consistently fielded a strong starting secondary. Piggy 1, Noeller and 17to85 2 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago On 2025-10-06 at 8:45 AM, Pete said: Cmon, memory is selective, for example Burke was fired wasnt he? His team had the 2nd worst passing defence in the league, finished 3&15, you think he wouldn't be torn apart by this crew? The only thing that was on his side was having GM Mack to complain about the first 6 games Every head coach gets complained about even one thats taken their team to 5 grey cups I complain about him as well it basically comes with the job Very few fans complained about MIke Riley. He was pure gold winning two Grey Cups in 3 years. Always smiling, great to deal with as fans or with the media. Total opposite of his father, Bud who was Head Coach from 1974-77.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now