Mr. P's detailed thoughts in no particular order.

- Game. On.

30 minutes ago, Doublezero said:

I picked BC to win this. Never been happier to be wrong.

Same with me. 

Interesting...but not surprising on ZC comment on Lucky TD how it was 100 percent due to a vet receiver doing a specific thing to make that score...and also something they hadn't even ran thru in practice...he just knew...that's what we needed on offence...and something the QB can rely on

I would also like Bailey in too for those exact same things...and what he also brings in run game...sweeps...screens...let Johnson learn and marinate a yr..

 

2 minutes ago, Booch said:

Interesting...but not surprising on ZC comment on Lucky TD how it was 100 percent due to a vet receiver doing a specific thing to make that score...and also something they hadn't even ran thru in practice...he just knew...that's what we needed on offence...and something the QB can rely on

I would also like Bailey in too for those exact same things...and what he also brings in run game...sweeps...screens...let Johnson learn and marinate a yr..

 

Yup Bailey takes Johnsons spot and does everything better. Would help a ton. Lucky I think added a calming influence to the O. Needed that shot of experience. 

4 minutes ago, Mr. Perfect said:

Mr. P's detailed thoughts in no particular order.

- Game. On.

I’ve thought this over for some time:  I really like dominating wins.
You’re welcome.

I love dominant defense so much more than dominant offense.

2 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Yup Bailey takes Johnsons spot and does everything better. Would help a ton. Lucky I think added a calming influence to the O. Needed that shot of experience. 

I was reading on X today. Someone said that O'Shea says we don't need Bailey. He said the rookie receivers are doing just fine. 

9 minutes ago, do or die said:

VA wasn't finding the primary guy (credit coverage).......looks like a different (bad) QB, when he has to go deep into his reads..........

The key to beating him has never been pressure, it’s allways been about dropping Guys back taking away the easy routes, rotating coverage and keeping things disguised. We did exactly that, last week too. JY is a stud DC. 

2 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

I love dominant defense so much more than dominant offense.

O is more fun to watch in the regular season, D takes you much further. I love the physical domination of the game. From Brady rumbling, to lucky fighting, and the secondary shutting down every thing. 

5 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Yup Bailey takes Johnsons spot and does everything better. Would help a ton. Lucky I think added a calming influence to the O. Needed that shot of experience. 

Lawler...Demski...Wilson..Bailey..Lucky..Woli and Clercius when all healthy...that's a solid group.

And swap out Case for Smith..Smith offers more in regards to use on offence and he also played covers...Case is pedestrian

4 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

I was reading on X today. Someone said that O'Shea says we don't need Bailey. He said the rookie receivers are doing just fine. 

Shows how brain dead he is...other than Wilson no other rookie has done ****...I not including Clercius as he is a Canadian

3 minutes ago, Booch said:

Lawler...Demski...Wilson..Bailey..Lucky..Woli and Clercius when all healthy...that's a solid group.

And swap out Case for Smith..Smith offers more in regards to use on offence and he also played covers...Case is pedestrian

Shows how brain dead he is...other than Wilson no other rookie has done ****...I not including Clercius as he is a Canadian

Wheatfall?

Just now, Colin Unger said:

Wheatfall?

Don't expect him back anytime soon

Imagine where we would be with an even halfway competent offense.

It's just a matter of time before punting costs us a game as well. Probably an important one.

Id be tapping the breaks on Bailey after the performance of Lucky. Where do we play Bailey when everyone is healthy?

 

-------------------------------

We're now in the positive on points for and against for the season.

Edited August 2, 20241 yr by Colin Unger

3 minutes ago, Colin Unger said:

Id be tapping the breaks on Bailey after the performance of Lucky. Where do we play Bailey when everyone is healthy?

In Johnsons spot.... As soon as ******* possible. 

Just now, Noeller said:

In Johnsons spot.... As soon as ******* possible. 

If not sooner!

Johnson experiment needs to end. But Wilson I think is a find and a keeper. 
 

Edited August 2, 20241 yr by Goalie

With Lawler back and Lucky in, we won’t need Johnson or Bailey or whoever …

11 minutes ago, Noeller said:

In Johnsons spot.... As soon as ******* possible. 

Isn’t lawler expected back next game? I’m still in favour of Bailey brought back and starting 4 Americans at receiver while Woli is out and then designating an American vet and the naturalized Canadian for the 8 ratio spot 

HUh... Looks like the BC loins showed up tonight. 

3 minutes ago, Goalie said:

Johnson experiment needs to end. But Wilson I think is a find and a keeper. 
 

Thot he made a contribution on those quick outlet passes, got good first down yardage on a number of those

5 minutes ago, blue85gold said:

Isn’t lawler expected back next game? I’m still in favour of Bailey brought back and starting 4 Americans at receiver while Woli is out and then designating an American vet and the naturalized Canadian for the 8 ratio spot 

give the injuries we've already seen at receiver this year do we really want to go forward without depth?

1 hour ago, Doublezero said:

Ford's pick was an actual turning point.

That was huge. It was the thing that flipped field position a bit because lord knows our punter is never going to kick us out of a hole. 

Also never seen before. B.C. Sucks, 4 - 1st downs. Time o’ possession 42 - 18 for the dominant team, the Thunder of The Winnipeg Blue Bombers. B.C. Sucks 102 yards O, the Powerful Commanding Winnipeg Blue Bombers - 430 yards O. Remarkable Attendance - don’t need a rapper to almost sell out. 4 effen sacks by the Mighty Winnipeg Blue Bombers. 
B.C. Proved they suck. 

Edited August 2, 20241 yr by Rod Black

Case came in for Wilson when the spotter pulled him. So he's a utility spare receiver/returner. But if Lawler returns in 2 weeks, what are the chances we see Lucky Whitehead returning punts/kickoffs? They were using Lucky today same way they tried to give Janarion Grant some reps on offence in the past.

2 hours ago, blue85gold said:

Isn’t lawler expected back next game? I’m still in favour of Bailey brought back and starting 4 Americans at receiver while Woli is out and then designating an American vet and the naturalized Canadian for the 8 ratio spot 

Lawler hasn’t practiced and has missed like a month and a half of games. I don’t expect him to be ready to go the same week he starts practicing. Even with the bye week I think he’s at best two weeks away.