bigg jay Posted yesterday at 06:36 PM Report Posted yesterday at 06:36 PM 40 minutes ago, Bubba Zanetti said: 190 pound DE?!? Just put him on the FatBoi diet and he'll be tiptoeing up to the play in no time! 31 minutes ago, Booch said: pretty sure thats an oopsie.....dude dont look no 190 Yeah i think they just enter the height/weight for Williams twice (both listed as 6'1, 190). Most places have him listed at 6 or 6'1 and around 255. Booch, Tracker and wbbfan 1 1 1
17to85 Posted yesterday at 06:41 PM Report Posted yesterday at 06:41 PM 4 minutes ago, bigg jay said: Just put him on the FatBoi diet and he'll be tiptoeing up to the play in no time! Hey I can show a guy how to go from 190 to 235 easy. Did that over the course of a couple years in university. I call it the pizza and beer diet. Stickem, bigg jay, Noeller and 4 others 2 4 1
bigg jay Posted yesterday at 06:58 PM Report Posted yesterday at 06:58 PM 16 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Hey I can show a guy how to go from 190 to 235 easy. Did that over the course of a couple years in university. I call it the pizza and beer diet. I am very well versed in this particular diet... HardCoreBlue, Bubba Zanetti, wbbfan and 3 others 1 5
bigg jay Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago Another futures signing: https://www.bgmsportstrax.com/2025/10/06/winnipeg-blue-bombers-sign-offensive-lineman-sebastian-pares-to-a-future-contract/ bb1 1
Booch Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago be nice if we signed a current situation signing and inserted said signing...they are out there but when you have the mindset "we good" and the belief that things will just work...cause they so happened to do so 4...5 yrs ago.well you get a less than stellar roster that can compete...but not finish the deal Piggy 1, Blue-urns and wbbfan 3
Pete Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Booch said: be nice if we signed a current situation signing and inserted said signing...they are out there but when you have the mindset "we good" and the belief that things will just work...cause they so happened to do so 4...5 yrs ago.well you get a less than stellar roster that can compete...but not finish the deal Agree, BC hss done that and improved their dline a ton Edited 8 hours ago by Pete wbbfan 1
Goalie Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 48 minutes ago, Pete said: Agree, BC hss done that and improved their dline a ton I go back to Demario Houston who was here with hall as DC and now Younger. Even Houston a vet admitted he needed a few weeks to get the terminology and schemes down. I would guess for a guy brand new to Canada never mind the cfl, it’s gonna take some time to get used to everything. I think our D scheme is a little more complex than BCs. BC spent money on betts and the DL and want the sacks. We seem to be content with just pressure and if we get a sack in the process, great. I feel some teams D live and die on sacks and pressure, ours ? Not so much. But then I see B.C. has given up 454 points through 16 games. Bombers 373 through 15. Weirdly enough riders given up the least. Then it’s us Calgary and Montreal at 373 through 15 games. BC actually well. Toronto has given up the most then BC then Hamilton then Ottawa. Then there’s a gap but Edmonton also over 400 points given up. Everyone else? Under Edited 7 hours ago by Goalie
17to85 Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, Goalie said: We seem to be content with just pressure We don't get pressure though... HardCoreBlue, Blue-urns, bigg jay and 1 other 1 3
TBURGESS Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago What do the D stats look like over the last month? That's when BC finally started to play decent D.
JuranBoldenRules Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 14 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: What do the D stats look like over the last month? That's when BC finally started to play decent D. The only QB's they've held under 25 points are Tre Ford, Montreal's 3rd and 4th stringers, Crum and Vernon Adams the past 3 weeks. Edited 5 hours ago by JuranBoldenRules rebusrankin, Tracker, Noeller and 1 other 3 1
rebusrankin Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago BC has an excellent offense and a pretty poor D. bigg jay, Piggy 1, Bigblue204 and 1 other 1 3
TBURGESS Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Last 4 weeks BC held CGY to 23 & 24, TOR to 22, and OTT to 27. Their big problem right now is the number of penalties they're taking.
HardCoreBlue Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 5 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: Last 4 weeks BC held CGY to 23 & 24, TOR to 22, and OTT to 27. Their big problem right now is the number of penalties they're taking. In summary, BC sucks? Yes I do indeed need new material. 🙂
Pete Catan's Ghost Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 1 hour ago, HardCoreBlue said: In summary, BC sucks? Yes I do indeed need new material. While seemingly contradictory, redundancy and accuracy occurs in many contexts. You’re good. Edited 1 hour ago by Pete Catan's Ghost
Goalie Posted 46 minutes ago Report Posted 46 minutes ago 5 hours ago, 17to85 said: We don't get pressure though... But our D has allowed 70 less points in the same number of games. Sacks and pressure is nice but doesn’t lead to points not being scored against.
rebusrankin Posted 23 minutes ago Report Posted 23 minutes ago 2 hours ago, HardCoreBlue said: In summary, BC sucks? Yes I do indeed need new material. 🙂 Nothing wrong with the classics.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now