Man, they're quite cocky over there right now. They played a decent game, nothing scary, we aint BC.

Haba over a healthy woods is not good. I don’t like that and I don’t like Wilson being a GTD, just scratch him. However he is a good tackler so there is that. Might be strong vs the run. Our DL won’t be so our LBs gonna have to tackle. Pretty sure the guys on the pr they want back will be.  Jake and schmek with 1 end fronts is my concern here. Cuz we do that lots and it seems that we will be going that way again for some reason. Maybe Fox instead but man. If fox goes down we are hooped. 

Edited November 9, 20241 yr by Goalie

11 minutes ago, Goalie said:

Maybe Fox instead but man. If fox goes down we are hooped. 

Which is probably 50/50 given his history 

37 minutes ago, JohnnyAbonny said:

Which is probably 50/50 given his history 

Also Alexander busted up, Taylor hasn't dressed in a game in 53 weeks and has 2 weeks of practice in.

Kind of a risky lineup on D.

4 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

Also Alexander busted up, Taylor hasn't dressed in a game in 53 weeks and has 2 weeks of practice in.

Kind of a risky lineup on D.

We need a nervous emoticon.

1 hour ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

Have never seen Haba show a single flash of being an impactful or even good CFLer.

Flashes but fever few and very far between. I thought he was making an impact in game 1 before he got hurt and he did have some plays early on last year... but overall he seems a one trick pony whose trick is figured out.

As others have said we need a strong game from the O to take this one.  On D it could be a long day of watching dbs trying to tackle Armstead or Oullette after 8-12 yards gained… or worse.

I love our team and hope I’m wrong but I expect JT and schmek are gonna get walked on.

17 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

Also Alexander busted up, Taylor hasn't dressed in a game in 53 weeks and has 2 weeks of practice in.

Kind of a risky lineup on D.

To be frank...it's a shitty...weak and extremely poor use of assets for a big game

2 minutes ago, BigBlueFanatic said:

As others have said we need a strong game from the O to take this one.  On D it could be a long day of watching dbs trying to tackle Armstead or Oullette after 8-12 yards gained… or worse.

I love our team and hope I’m wrong but I expect JT and schmek are gonna get walked on.

They will do absolutely nothing..and will ripple through the defence as to what we are planning..

Loved our DL play yesterday. Master class in stopping the run for the most part. 

Riders game plan was confusing a lot of the time. 2nd and short a few times and they wouldn't run it. Armstrong was no where to be found. And attacked Ford often. 

**** the Riders.... that is all 

49 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said:

Riders game plan was confusing a lot of the time. 2nd and short a few times and they wouldn't run it. Armstrong was no where to be found. And attacked Ford often. 

I liked their game plan. Played right into our strengths.

53 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said:

Riders game plan was confusing a lot of the time. 2nd and short a few times and they wouldn't run it. Armstrong was no where to be found. And attacked Ford often. 

Ouellette being completely useless was a great help to us.

Guy needs to lay off the juice and work on something other than his arms and bench.

Edited November 10, 20241 yr by JuranBoldenRules

1 minute ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

Ouellette being completely useless was a great help to us.

Guy needs to lay off the juice and work on something other than his arms and bench.

Yea what a non factor.

5 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

Ouellette being completely useless was a great help to us.

Guy needs to lay off the juice and work on something other than his arms and bench.

Makes all the talk last week about how he was “paid for November” pretty funny 

Ouellette was such a mouthpiece... He said something on TSN about being motivated by the boo's, and they had a special celebration for the fans for after the game. Funny I'm not sure I saw it.....

28 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

Ouellette being completely useless was a great help to us.

Guy needs to lay off the juice and work on something other than his arms and bench.

Ya he seems pretty easy to just tip over 

Guess he’s gotta try a different hair colour next time. What’s kinda wild is he really is getting paid the big bucks. Sask had a good D but so much wasted cash on the O(uellette) 

 

bombers exposed them. They got a garbage time TD. Big woop. The game was never really that close. 
 

like dems crying in America. Trump killed you. It wasn’t close. Shut up now. Look at yourselves. Riders won’t do that. They will blame others. It’s why they suck. Bombers were trump last night. Riders were Harris. Pretty much over early in reality 

But most importantly Zach was great again last night. 

Edited November 10, 20241 yr by Goalie

20 minutes ago, Goalie said:

Guess he’s gotta try a different hair colour next time. What’s kinda wild is he really is getting paid the big bucks. Sask had a good D but so much wasted cash on the O(uellette) 

 

bombers exposed them. They got a garbage time TD. Big woop. The game was never really that close. 
 

like dems crying in America. Trump killed you. It wasn’t close. Shut up now. Look at yourselves. Riders won’t do that. They will blame others. It’s why they suck. Bombers were trump last night. Riders were Harris. Pretty much over early in reality 

But most importantly Zach was great again last night. 

Sask has a good pass rush.  Stop that and you're putting up 500 yards on that secondary.

Everything else across the board is average and OL is bad.

Ouellete is under contract for next season too.

Ouelette had 24 rushes for 120 yards... But two of those went for 26 and 30 yards. Take those away and his two 1 yd TDs and you are looking at 20 rushes that went 62 yards.

If you are sitting at 3 ypc for the majority of your rushes you are gonna have a tough time

4 minutes ago, rebusrankin said:

Ouellete is under contract for next season too.

Capital One: What's in your Ouellete?

1 hour ago, HardCoreBlue said:

Yea what a non factor.

I wouldn't call him a non factor. he had a few nice runs but for the most part he didn't really contribute much. If I was Mace, I'd release him.

17 minutes ago, Super Duper Negatron said:

Capital One: What's in your Ouellete?

Some kind of steroid? 

Did the Rider curse themselves by winning the 2007 Grey Cup . Since then they are 0-4 vs the Bombers in the Playoffs.