https://www.tsn.ca/naylor-many-questions-but-few-answers-on-a-2021-cfl-season-1.1543725

The Canadian Football League has been outrageously quiet since it pulled the plug on its season more than two months ago, leaving behind a wake of speculation about where things are headed next.

With the reality setting in that COVID-19 is likely to still be around in some form next summer, there is real concern about what the 2021 season might look like or if it will occur at all.

There are teams that believe it is vitally important to play in 2021 and that without a season the CFL is in danger of being mothballed. Whether every team believes that is another question. And there is a lot to sort out before anyone can accurately predict what a season might look like and how much pain the teams are collectively willing to stomach to make it happen.

The league and its franchises are currently running through various scenarios for next season, trying to get a handle on true costs of each and working at ways to trim budgets and save money. That’s likely to continue until the league can truly choose a course of action, which feels like next April at the earliest.

Why? Well, there’s not much point in fully committing to a scenario that’s seven months away if that scenario might be totally unrealistic by the time you get there.

There has been no 2021 business plan presented yet, only regular updates to the presidents and governors about what the league is doing to prepare for the unknown.

It should be noted that teams will need to make decisions about retaining assistant coaches with expiring contracts by December, which will be the first real economic commitments to a 2021 season. Restrictions on signing players will need to be lifted well before the opening of February free agency, where players are likely to meet a cautious market – one in which signing bonuses will probably be absent.

There’s a collective bargaining agreement to amend, if not renegotiate, with the players, which will require some kind of pressure point because it always does. But the league can’t sit down with the players until it gets a true handle on revenues and it can’t do that until it chooses a course of action.

Will CFL teams be allowed to have full stadiums next summer? It doesn't seem likely. But just what percentage of capacity will be allowed – if any at all – is impossible to guess. It seems as if the league is counting on the restrictions that currently prevent fans from being in stadiums being lifted. But to what degree?

When will we see a schedule? Good question. Or could we see multiple schedules for different scenarios? Never say never.

Could it be a 21-week, 18-game season played in home stadiums? Unlikely, given the losses teams are expected to take with reduced numbers of fans in the stands. Could we see a return to the 10-week bubble? Maybe. A nine-game schedule played in home stadiums before fans? Perhaps.

The point is no one knows, so demanding answers to questions that can’t possibly be answered right now is a waste of time.

All we know is that there’s going to be a lot less revenue for teams to operate with under any scenario, not just because of crowd restrictions but also due to older fans choosing to stay home for their safety. The CFL’s fan demographics do it no favours in this regard.

Getting consensus on a best course of action won’t be easy for the CFL’s nine teams. Back in the summer, there were teams that were willing to play without government support and teams that weren’t. And just like then, the biggest challenge commissioner Randy Ambrosie faces now is finding a scenario they can all live with.

Adopting a revenue-sharing model so that each team absorbs the same amount of red ink would certainly make consensus-building easier, which many believe should be the direction for the future, COVID-19 or not.

The other elephant in the room is federal government, which many in the CFL believe left it high and dry last summer after months of back-and-forth talks where the league believed it was making progress.

Is the CFL prepared to go down that road again, knowing it doesn’t control the timeline and larger forces can change things in an instant? Perhaps, although it’s not as though the feds don’t have a long list of people coming at them with their hands out.

There will be voices demanding the owners suck up the losses of playing a season under any circumstance, as owners have done in other sports. But the business calculation in sports such as MLB, NFL, NHL and NBA is different because of the percentage of revenues those leagues derive from television.

Losses sustained by playing in those leagues can also be viewed as investments towards protecting massive franchise values. That’s not the case in the CFL, where teams can’t just float money on the backs of their franchise values, and where one third of the teams are publicly owned.

It would be beneficial for the league to soon announce its formal commitment to play some kind of season in 2021.

But beyond that, get ready for months more of waiting with lots of questions and speculation but very few answers.

12 hours ago, CodyT said:

Here's a question I'll pose to our group here,

Vernon Adams, Matt's Nichols, or Fajardo 

 

Who you taking?

I'm not sure I trust VA. He had some great games, but overall was just meh, imo. Really **** the bed in the playoffs.

6 minutes ago, sweep the leg said:

I'm not sure I trust VA. He had some great games, but overall was just meh, imo. Really **** the bed in the playoffs.

Think he is a bit of a risk taker. Gotta take the bad with the good with that guy.

1 hour ago, 17to85 said:

Think he is a bit of a risk taker. Gotta take the bad with the good with that guy.

Adams will get better with experience the more big games he plays. He has more of an upside than Cody Fajardo. 

52 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

Adams will get better with experience the more big games he plays. He has more of an upside than Cody Fajardo. 

Way better athelete as well and it *appears* that he is coachable unlike some of the other recent flash in the pans like Jennings.  

I'll give Fajardo the benefit of the doubt and will reserve final judgement until after this season on how good he can be.  I think a lot of Fajardo was his awkwardness in how he extended plays and I wasn't that thrilled when he was contained in the pocket.   With Adams their was a noticeable improvement last year of his pocket presence and he still has the atheletic ability to throw a good ball and to elude defenders chasing him.    Nichols... well he better hope he gets a lot of protection if he plays this season, the guy can't move anymore. 

Adams, Faj-JJ, Nichols.

43 minutes ago, Brandon said:

Way better athelete as well and it *appears* that he is coachable unlike some of the other recent flash in the pans like Jennings.  

I'll give Fajardo the benefit of the doubt and will reserve final judgement until after this season on how good he can be.  I think a lot of Fajardo was his awkwardness in how he extended plays and I wasn't that thrilled when he was contained in the pocket.   With Adams their was a noticeable improvement last year of his pocket presence and he still has the atheletic ability to throw a good ball and to elude defenders chasing him.    Nichols... well he better hope he gets a lot of protection if he plays this season, the guy can't move anymore. 

OLB & DE can't pinch in or he'll kill them with that reverse bucket step to the right. He made a lot of plays doing that & defenses should have taken that away after half a season. Getting **** canned a few times doing that would stop him from doing that so much. 

20 minutes ago, TBURGESS said:

Adams, Faj-JJ, Nichols.

Yup, I would take a proven winner with Nichols first. You can keep your backups. 

On 2021-01-22 at 9:36 AM, Dr Zaius said:

With the way our defense showed up in the Grey Cup, Nichols wins that game for us.

That being said, I don't think Nichols would have won the game in Saskatchewan. Collaros made timely plays under pressure. Buried in our endzone and hitting Adams 35 yards down field on the sideline just isn't a throw I think Matt Nichols ever completes. 

Or the throw to Darvin Adams back of the end zone vs Calgary. That would have been a sack. That was the official start of our GC run. When we all started to believe. The players too. Might have been the season's most important play establishing Zach Collaros. 

53 minutes ago, JCon said:

Yup, I would take a proven winner with Nichols first. You can keep your backups. 

Maybe 5 years ago, but going forward? Yikes!

 

man, what a kick in the nuts that'd be for the Esks....

On 2021-01-23 at 1:44 AM, CodyT said:

Here's a question I'll pose to our group here,

Vernon Adams, Matt's Nichols, or Fajardo 

 

Who you taking?

Thats a tough choice. I always liked fajardo before he was a rider and thought he could be good. I liked vaj too. 

I dont think Fajardo is adapting quick enough for the pro game. And im not sure he's had the right Co to develop further, rather then just cover up for his weaknesses. 

I think Vaj has a better chance to be developed with khari as hc. But I think as we saw from him in his game against us his head/temper will be his un doing kinda like jason maas as a coach. 

I actually think MBT in toronto will have more success then any of those 3. 

 

2 minutes ago, M.O.A.B. said:

 

 

Argos signed Martavis Bryant....That might be interesting. Wonder what he's been up to

11 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said:

Argos signed Martavis Bryant....That might be interesting. Wonder what he's been up to

Wonder who will be throwing to him.

Total nut punch for Edmonton.

22 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said:

Argos signed Martavis Bryant....That might be interesting. Wonder what he's been up to

 

8 minutes ago, Jpan85 said:

 

Yikes!

At last, Noel Thorpe got his chance! Unless their GM have other plans.

Edited January 25, 20215 yr by M.O.A.B.

43 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said:

Argos signed Martavis Bryant....That might be interesting. Wonder what he's been up to

If he’s got his head on straight, and that’s a huge if, he could be an absolute beast.

1 hour ago, wbbfan said:

I always liked fajardo before he was a rider

Based on what? All he ever did was short yardage.

I feel bad for the Esks...what a shitty thing to have happen right now. You'd rather see it happen to the Riders, but of course they don't have anyone that anybody else wants. 

😂😂😂

24 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Based on what? All he ever did was short yardage.

i saw a large portion of his college career. 

Not great for the schmoes for sure...Jonesie left the igloo for  Sask. pronto after a Cup win....also left a bad taste in a lot Esks. fans gobs....I don't see them as being forgetting or forgiving...I see them going in a total different direction..Isn't June Jones available ????  Nothing like sticking with the Joneses....