Jump to content

bb1

Members
  • Posts

    1,842
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bb1

  1. Read above been stated that veltung is a healthy scratch.
  2. Big assumption there is that we have 4 healthy import receivers who are better than the NI's. We don't. Also the "starting" 8 NI's doesn't limit how they use the imports at all. Well if we don't dress the import cause we are going to play 8 can then I'm not sure you understand the argument.Last week we were going to go with 4 imports when Moore was gonna dress but instead of dressing jhomo Gordon when Moore couldn't play we went back to 3 imp Rev 2 Cnd get it?BTW if you think dressing jfg over veltung is the way to go not much more I can say to ya really.The Bombers are playing the maximum number of imports allowed. Starting 8 Canadians doesn't change that. I don't prefer JFG to Veltung, but I prefer him to Jhomo Gordon, who is a project to put it mildly. Having Jhomo Gordon on the roster last week wouldn't have made a lick of difference. I feel bad for you if you truly are just judging CFL players by their passports. Gordon was terrible in both preseason games. Hopefully he's learned how to run his routes and read the defense to get open and on the same page as his QB in the last couple months. Well MOS is playing Jhomo instead of going with Jfg and Kohler as starters with another can as a backup.So your liking Jfg over jhomo is not seen by the Blue coaches.I like Jfg but his speed doesn't scare anyone.
  3. Big assumption there is that we have 4 healthy import receivers who are better than the NI's. We don't. Also the "starting" 8 NI's doesn't limit how they use the imports at all. Well if we don't dress the import cause we are going to play 8 can then I'm not sure you understand the argument.Last week we were going to go with 4 imports when Moore was gonna dress but instead of dressing jhomo Gordon when Moore couldn't play we went back to 3 imp Rev 2 Cnd get it?BTW if you think dressing jfg over veltung is the way to go not much more I can say to ya really.
  4. Ok is anybody from the media gonna ask MOS y he insists in making our lineup weaker with 8 Cnd? I think Marve would rather get 4 imp Recievers to throw to no?
  5. I'm just wonderin what doesn't make you reach for your gin?
  6. This is kind of a scary comment. Did MOS just figure this out and y wasn't this different skillset used more often when the status quo wasn't working.I for one hope Marve lights it up and shows all the haters what's what including MOS Jk just squeak out a win baby..☺ How is this a scary comment. This is a typical MOS comment that is just a thinly disguised sneer at a dumb question. It you find this scary then you are really looking for crap. Yeah your right just lookin for crap
  7. This is kind of a scary comment. Did MOS just figure this out and y wasn't this different skillset used more often when the status quo wasn't working.I for one hope Marve lights it up and shows all the haters what's what including MOS
  8. Unfortunately Mb won't change his schemes to take advantage of Marve's skillset.
  9. Why were we going to start 4 import receivers when Moore could play but switched to 8cdn when he couldn't? Is that on the OC or HC?
  10. Yep gotta agree with this turnovers killed us.No way MOS replaces his OC didn't replace his DC last year till the offseason just not that kind of coach will ride it out no matter what.Game we gotta just put behind us.If it get us rid of Brohm its all good
  11. Yeah Noeller was watching Archie and friends instead. ......
  12. I think that one goof on the special teams where they let hammy run it in on a onside punt killed them.
  13. Bridge didn't look good at all. Not capable of being a starting CFL qb. I guess Higgins felt it was better to bring Cato back. He sure made the right choice.Oh, definitely. I just wonder how Bridge beat out Cato in the first place.They wanted the publicity of having a Canadian QB on the roster but never thought they would actually have to play their #3.Nope don't buy it.No way Higgins risks a loss over a publicity ploy.What I read is they were neck and neck after that one week but Higgins had a gut feeling that Cato was the one to try.Maybe not as familiar with Canadian football it took Cato a little longer than Bridges to come around? Yeah you're right Montreal never puts guys on the roster for the publicity.Not at QB. .....
  14. Bridge didn't look good at all. Not capable of being a starting CFL qb. I guess Higgins felt it was better to bring Cato back. He sure made the right choice.Oh, definitely. I just wonder how Bridge beat out Cato in the first place.They wanted the publicity of having a Canadian QB on the roster but never thought they would actually have to play their #3.Nope don't buy it.No way Higgins risks a loss over a publicity ploy.What I read is they were neck and neck after that one week but Higgins had a gut feeling that Cato was the one to try.Maybe not as familiar with Canadian football it took Cato a little longer than Bridges to come around?
  15. What's strange is didn't he lose weight in the offseason to slim down?Wonder y?
  16. Just did a quick lookup on Cole listed as a LB but at 242 might be a rush end for us?
  17. We'd be royally screwed if we lost Willy, but then we'd be somewhat improved if our number two got hurt. Man that was good for a chuckle.....
  18. True that - but regardless, when are WE going to start getting our own quarterbacks and not have to rely on other teams castoffs. Don't forget, for every Willy there's a Lefors, Glenn, Brohm, TJ Rubley, etc. Not that I wish ill will on Willy - though I still need to see him playing in October like he is now before I anoint him the next Bomber QB - I would just like to see us recruit and develop our own Qb for once. If/when Willy goes down again, we got nothing. Really though in the CFL there are a ton of QBs that are developed on one team that blossemed for another, AC but just one example of a huge list.Really I don't care and I give Kudos to Walters and Danny Mac for getting us our best Qb since a healthy Buck who was another castoff for us.☺
  19. If I was a Sask fan I would be comparing my QBs to Cato. They actually had him on their neg list but dropped him after Cato wanted a contract offer.That has to hurt.
  20. Why would the Als want him? Cato is already showing well at 23. He'll just keep getting better. I see Ray more likely ending up in Ottawa. Close to Toronto, and Burris is done. Yep Cato is a very exciting young Qb unless Ray was willing to go in some kind of future OC mentor kind of thing(which they already have AC for)i don't see it at all.Ott maybe Sask maybe BC...
  21. I find it hard to believe that Taman wants this change now, most likely coming from higher up. Yeah I agree you can like or hate Taman but he never would throw CC under the bus like that,let him hang in the wind.Always was a class act imo.
  22. You know that's kinda funny because on the Rider Forum it's 50-50 on Smith.Some are calling him a wash some saying they see something in him. Reminds me of all the years we debated Elliot ,Brink et AL. But the similarities when it comes to seeing the potential or not in a young Qb seems to be exactly the same with all fans.
  23. Well not to sound like a ****** but this kinda is his first time being around after a win lolNot really Spuds hell I've been around since the old ourbombers and post good and bad,but again everyone is allowed their opinion what a forum is about no?I am definitely not blue colored glasses though I do admit.
×
×
  • Create New...