bb1

Well i just wanted to say congrats to the Blue. After the way the year started I was definitely one of those who thought here we go again. Thankfully I was wrong and I think it does reflect well on the organisation that it can rethink it's starting Qb and do whatever it has too (like bringing back Denmark) to field a winning team. Kudos to MOS and Walter's.

I still think the Refs screwed up the review because the whistle had clearly been blown before the fumble....which happens all the time when forward progress has been stopped and they are all jumping in there..the play was dead.

Well I gotta give u credit u don't give up....long as he is in and we win it's all good in my book.?

Milo misses one he would normally make but that's the way it goes,Saskatchewan looks 100% better and isn't a walkover anymore.

I wonder where Gurly gets slotted in? Love to see him at SB with his size but he doesn't seem to be a big YAC guy so who knows...wherever lol...one more weapon for Nichols.

You know one thing that isn't discussed when it comes to Nichols is how little playing time as a starter he has had.Due to injuries and then being behind Reilly. If he is inconsistent I think given time and experience he is only going to get better in this area. At least let's give him a full year as a starter.?

Yep whatever it takes to get him on the roster is fine with me...bubbles glasses or not....

Well he is gonna play as a KR so your point is wrong. And Messam is a different type of player so your point is meaningless. They are trying to get him somewhere on the roster because he deserves to play.If you have a problem with that it's your problem not mine.?

That's funny suggested this earlier in the year and it was no no no Flanders is a RB can't return kicks lol....long as we get him on the roster somewhere cause he deserves it...?

Well I called it before and really this is the best for us.Trouba 's inflated ego needs to perch somewhere else.Good riddance ,make him wait till we get the best deal for him then kiss that lazy ass good bye....

We lost and it was tough but I'm proud to be Bombers fan again cause this team has a ton of heart ...watch out for us in the playoffs. This team is no pushover for anybody...

This is what worries me ,I don't like trading Willy before we saw what he could do in front of a decent oline. I wish him well but hope he doesn't come back to haunt us..

The problem with that is that MOS really wants the flexibility for special teams. Denmark doesn't fill that need. I agree I would love to see Denmark on the roster but it's a good problem to have.

I heard MOS say Foketi had a good game and Nichols wasn't touched so I'm going with a keep a good thing going theme too?

Now we have Bill Watters stating Trouba wants out....the tears are flowing as I speak...

Yup he definitely thinks he is top 2 most definitely ,too bad he hasn't proved it.And it's no rumour he bailed Gary Roberts camp. Give this guy a long term contract where he can float is a big time gamble. Just an opinion but the guy is looking for Buff like dollars and has done jack **** in this league. I give you guys one thing though if his talent going forward is as big as his ego he will be a star...?

Smith or Randle if we absolutely have to, those 2 areas are strengths.Not having a adequate backup Qb is spelling disaster in this league. You just have to look at how many teams have already had to use their backups this year to realize this is a no brainer. In the CFL it's all about the QB. ..

No this is the type of guy who can really burn you on a long term deal.Already questions about Trouba's level of commitment and off ice activities. Only sign him long term if we get a good discount or trade him imo.

If that's the case then we don't need him .You always give it your best no matter what.....

Not my point,my point was the need to have an experienced international olineman instead of Couture.We made it through so it's moot now anyway.?

What team beside the Blue is starting 3 international olinemen? Fact is we have only 1 raw rookie as backup every situation is different but if we have to put Couture in and wreck his confidence what then? There is many factors in this decision it's not clear cut at all...

Your kind of missing the point 1 backup with little experience in the CFL and one tackle making his first start how many games have we gone this year not losing at least 1 olineman?

Yes I see your point but keeping Nichols upright should be our no 1 priority and not hurting Couture by throwing him to the wolves too early.So yes get an American olineman as insurance we have depth at lb none really right now on the oline. TO is dressing 8...

Thomas is an emergency backup playing out of postion ,if we lose 2 tackles you comfortable putting him or Couture there? I remember Calgary losing 3 linemen last year in a game it's rare but does happen. It's a roll of the dice.....

Going in with only one oline backup seems risky to me esp since Courture is a raw rookie .....