Jump to content

bb1

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,070

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by bb1

  7. TNF-Rough Riders V Roughriders

    in Blue Bomber Discussion

    Posted

    2 hours ago, TBURGESS said:

    The penalty isn't for intentional hitting below the knees. It's the same as the play that took out Brown. Neither were intentional. Both were penalties. 

    Yes but in the first one he kept rolling, idk the suggestion on here that you don't rush the QB if your gonna get cut blocked makes no sense. Makes more sense to get rid of cut blocking imo.

  8. TNF-Rough Riders V Roughriders

    in Blue Bomber Discussion

    Posted

    24 minutes ago, TBURGESS said:

    The Refs on the field missed both calls. The CC got both calls right. That's what they are their for. To fix obvious mistakes.

    I disagree the cut block caused the player to go low,he went face first and didn't keep rolling into the QB. No way that was intentional,how can a player stop from being cut blocked? If the league wants to protect the Qbs, maybe make cut blocks illegal in all situations?

  15. GDT - Winnipeg Blue Bombers at Toronto Argonauts

    in Blue Bomber Discussion

    Posted

    6 hours ago, 3rdand1.5 said:

    I watched the game again....I know glutton for punishment...... 

     

    Biggie had some bad plays, but some good plays.....I still think he is a good player but no longer the great player he was and not the guy who should play all snaps.....

    BA was in the right spot a-lot 

    We did have both woods and Adams on at times....

    Our DB's dropped a couple.....

    Overall sure we can rag on a few of the guys....and some are not what they once were, but our defence played well...

    Our punter played pretty good, our coverage was very good...

    Case secured the ball well and looked good, our blocking seemed better

    Castillo had a tough day....but the last one the snap was bad....

    Zach actually didn't play bad...it just seemed like it to me on the first watch...he had no time or pocket almost all game...

    Brady played really good....minus the early fumble I feel he should have got the ball more

    The receivers were ok, but hard to fully judge as any route that took time never got to develop...

    Fumbleites.....yikes....

    The pick 6 was not on Zach...

    That offensive line OMG....and it wasn't the outside...it was the middle...Nuef, Eli, Kolo, Dobson all got DOMINATED.....

    The reffing wasn't as bad as last week , but consistency...especially what constitutes PI.....yikes....

     

     

    Yup that pick six , i honestly can't remember the last time the ball bounced out of 2 receivers hands into the Db...just ******* weird..that was our night in a nutshell right there. Murphys ******* law..

  16. CFL - 2024 Regular Season - Discussion Thread

    in Blue Bomber Discussion

    Posted

    2 hours ago, Tracker said:

    Before we get into heavy breathing about the remote possibility of Rourke, lets not forget the obvious and immediate problems on the O-line. Iam disappointed in Collaros' play but its a no-brainer to assume he would be significantly better with an O-line that is at least competent. No point in bringing a Rourke-grade QB in just to have him get shunted off to the 6-game IR list after two games.

    This,Neuf and Kolankowski took turns at being turnstiles yesterday i am not sure how they grade their oline but something has to give. The only thing with Zac is he doesn't seem to have his  scrambling ability anymore???

×
×
  • Create New...