BattleLevel

Can be said tho that T.O barely beat a team with a one-legged QB as thats what ZC was, and really from my info shouldn't even have played...Only reason he did was because it was the Grey Cup..
But I also agree...when he out on the run...he's just flat out deadly
and he will throw picks...I see 2 today minimum....And I have a feeling Swaray grabs one....complete with huge return on it

he's very effective in the pocket.....thinking that keeping him there in a chance to win is just chatter.....he will beat you...It's just with his group of receivers, and their skill of getting to spots, and both them and ZC knowing where they are gonna go....due to basically 4 yrs all together makes him lethal outside the pocket

If the Bombers consistently get pressure with their front four, this game will be sewn up quickly. I don't see VAj being able to pick apart the Bombers on the run. 

PI on an uncatchable pass.  Should only be 10 yards or need to call it illegal contact.
He's like the Michael Bishop of kickers.

There isn’t anyone on the panel or broadcast that I can’t stand (unless Suitor is being a huge homer) but I’d like to see a lineman given a chance on the broadcast. I’d appreciate the added perspective. 
Dustin Nielson has been a nice recentish addition and Rod Smith is my favourite. I wish there were two of him so he could be on the broadcast and host the panel. 

There isn’t anyone on the panel or broadcast that I can’t stand (unless Suitor is being a huge homer) but I’d like to see a lineman given a chance on the broadcast. I’d appreciate the added perspective. 
Dustin Nielson has been a nice recentish addition and Rod Smith is my favourite. I wish there were two of him so he could be on the broadcast and host the panel. 

I can at least understand that there might be a tiny bit of strategy behind that decision. I can’t believe that unnecessary roughness penalty. Absolutely moronic play

I remember the term “points for the good guys” when Hamilton was in the red zone, but I’m pretty sure it was the guy from the Arkells that said it

I remember the term “points for the good guys” when Hamilton was in the red zone, but I’m pretty sure it was the guy from the Arkells that said it

I can at least understand that there might be a tiny bit of strategy behind that decision. I can’t believe that unnecessary roughness penalty. Absolutely moronic play

such a headsup play, and decisive.  A pick there and we lose, I think.

BACK TO BACK COULDN’T FEEL ANY BETTER
 
(that being said a small handful of you sound like a whiny group of woe is me everyone is out to get us type Rider fans … gross) 
 
(also to the people who didn’t think the Arkells was a well done halftime show that can bring eyes to the league, nobody cares what you and the dinosaurs at your bridge club think about these things)
 
GO BOMBERS

I can at least understand that there might be a tiny bit of strategy behind that decision. I can’t believe that unnecessary roughness penalty. Absolutely moronic play

I can at least understand that there might be a tiny bit of strategy behind that decision. I can’t believe that unnecessary roughness penalty. Absolutely moronic play

Yes that took 23 years to pay off but that long term investment finally paid off lol

Let’s not talk about COVID here….

In talking to Bob Irving on the post-game show, he couldn't say enough great things about the Bombers organization and how much he loves Winnipeg and loves playing here. It really sounded to me like he was getting choked up when he was talking about how much he loves this team.
In the same interview he ripped into the Riders whole organization. I can't remember what he exactly said, but it had to do with how they are a garbage organization that employs dirty players. So on top of being a great quarterback, he's an excellent analyst of organizations. 😄

Adams did some great things today.
Harris is the straw that stirs the drink.
Great mental toughness by all to not let the mistakes fester.

And Grey Cups. Don't forget all the Grey Cups. 

That was a low point. Who was that Lion, Carl Kidd? 

The best offensive line in the CFL & second isn't even close. 

hey - Andrew Harris is back - we've all moved on.....

you could trot out Sayles..Thomas...Kongbo and Hansen in Sask and get probably get similar production to what they have now...thats how deep we are and a joke this is called a push..it will be evident in 6 days...as both lines roll over the Sask ones....Our oline guys on the run getting to second level with how our receivers block, and how guys like Marshall and Gainey don't like contact should almost be comical in the cold...can't wait to watch it
And yup...being tossed in the clink when some disturbance went on at a local eatery...there more to it than what they are saying, and it will sure look bad on Craig Penison when or if it comes out as more and he hushed it prior to a playoff game..tho it wont be a shock as he hushed to true extend of Leonards douchebaggery too

I vote for the 1990 Grey cup Battle. A one sided Battle on many counts. High defensive pressure in a pressurized stadium. That trip was worth every penny dug out of the couch. The only way it would have been better was if it was the other green guys. 

I’ve got a good amount of confidence in the Bombers this week, but there’s always a little doubt/what if thought in the back of my mind that others have mentioned. 
That said, the one thing I have confidence in is that Ed Gainey is going to take a moronic penalty or get badly beaten on a terrible read.