Atomic

I'd still go with Burris, I think. What's the problem with this team? Too young and inexperienced. So we're going to solve that with.... more youth and inexperience? Bring in Burris as a stop-gap for a couple years while we bring a young guy along. Bringing Collaros into this mess right now is just setting him up to fail.

Hall's okay. He's still got a lot to prove and doesn't really have much time to do it. If he wants to stick around, he's going to have to play very well in the final 3 games.

And the raw sex appeal of Tom Brady

The thing I like about Burris is that he has had success under several different systems over a period of many years. Collaros looks great, but he has only played in one system on a pretty good team with some great coaching. Could be a dramatic fall-off if Collaros comes here, which is less likely with Burris.

Burris sympathizer. No dumb ass qbs please. Funny that after all these years of poor QBing, we can still be too picky to accept the guy with the most passing yards in the league, an MOP award, a Grey Cup, a Grey Cup MVP, and a winning record

Who is the "horse's mouth"? DeMarco? If he's in our Top 3 then bring back Goltz because DeMarco isn't that good at all. . Would you rate Goltz higher than DeMarco? I wouldn't. When you think about it, DeMarco makes sense as a third option. The team is reluctant to take a risk on Tate (injuries), and there is little interest in bringing back Kevin Glenn (debate amongst yourselves on that one). Bo Levi Mitchell is apparently not on the market in any way, shape, or form. Really, that leaves DeMarco and Drew Willy as realistic options, and obviously someone thinks DeMarco has a higher ceiling.

Easy to say that, but when you look around the league it's just not the case. Hamilton has an above average OL, are Brian Simmons and Marc Dile dominant? Not so sure. Toronto has Tony Washington, he's good but not dominant. BC has a couple big names, but has either carried their weight this year? Not to the point of being called dominant. Stanley Bryant in Calgary and Xavier Fulton in Saskatchewan are possibly the best examples of great import tackles, but that's still just 2 tackles out of 10-15 starting import T's in the league. It's easy to SAY it, but not so easy to actually accomplish it.

I truly don't understand all the love Murphy gets on here. What has he done to prove to you that he'll be a successful GM in the league? Trust me, Hufnagel is a control freak and nothing happens unless he gives his blessing. So is the success in Calgary Hufs doing or Murphy's. Because Hufnagel controls every aspect of the football operations of the club. He doesn't allow any of his coaches do radio or TV interviews. Everything goes thru him. That's an interesting question from an evaluation point of view. What can you look at when determining if a person will be a good GM? 1. Past experience - This is, of course, the easiest thing to look at and also the most surefire way to know what you're getting. Have they done the job before, and did they do it well? 2. AGM experience - Failing to have actual experience, you have to move on to their body of work in other areas, as an assistant or director of player personnel. I think this is the most alluring part about John Murphy. He brought in pretty good talent in his short time here and he has always brought in solid talent for Calgary. That doesn't mean he can manage a team, but bringing in quality players is a big part of the puzzle. 3. League associations - How in tune is he with the league? How long has he been around? Has he worked in a successful organization? You talk about all the great things Hufnagel does for the Stamps, well, can we infer that Murphy has learned something from that? He certainly has connections to good coaches like Dave Dickenson and Rick Campbell... could we use that to our advantage? 4. References - This may be a little superficial because it's rare that a football executive will get trashed publicly, but sometimes we can learn from what other people say about them. In Murphy's case, I've never heard a bad word spoken about him, even from his time working with Mike Kelly. This could be a plus. I think there's a lot to like about Murphy, but it's true he is still an unknown. He is the kind of guy you would need to surround with experienced people so he doesn't get overwhelmed, but if we are looking at hiring a GM neophyte, I think we could do a lot worse than him.

I can't tell you how glad I am that he's not, to be honest

Who is the "horse's mouth"? Upper mgmt, can't say the name unfortunately. Very legit source though.

Lots of rookies but the core of the offence has tons of experience... i.e. Burris, Fantuz, Hage, Dyakowski, O'Neill, Wojt, Diedrick, Grant.

Isn't that the whole point of these discussion boards...to discuss/speculate? Tough crowd in here. I like how he says it like our speculation is going to be more valid once we know who the GM is. It's still just speculation either way.

Damn I usually don't miss that stuff. Bad season making me rusty I guess.

The Bombers' top 3 QB targets this off-season will be: 1. Collaros 2. Burris 3. DeMarco That's straight from the horse's mouth this weekend.

Are you sure Sorensen, Morley, Parenteau, and Kohlert are all FA's? I haven't seen that reported for any of them. Foster and Etienne yes, the others, not so sure.And just because Ottawa says something does not mean they are going to do it. Yes I'm 100% sure my FA's listed are in fact FA's.Based on...?

As far as the OL goes, we can't just keep getting younger. We need to sign a free agent centre, guard, or both to add some veteran presence there.

Are you sure Sorensen, Morley, Parenteau, and Kohlert are all FA's? I haven't seen that reported for any of them. Foster and Etienne yes, the others, not so sure. And just because Ottawa says something does not mean they are going to do it.

Interesting, not much love for Denmark and looks like he's going to finish as our most productive receiver. Figures!

Time? With 2 or 3 year contracts and no restricted free agency, CFL teams don't have the luxury of time. If he bolts to another team this offseason, what the hell was the point? 3 years down the tubes. At least if the Esks lost Coehoorn they got 2 very good years out of him.

He should be the first to go.

I guess we'll never know. All we can say is that Coehoorn has done far more than Etienne at this point. As he should, as he's like 5 years older with far more training... Perhaps that should have been taken into consideration when drafting

I guess we'll never know. All we can say is that Coehoorn has done far more than Etienne at this point.

I hope they take Poblah. Wouldn't be surprised. Also wouldn't be surprised to see him succeed in a new environment. Unfortunately our inept coaching staff seems to have sucked any talent that existed right out of him.

Who cares? Playing football is a choice. People die in car accidents every day, should we limit cars to 20 km/h? No, because that's ridiculous. The knowledge is out there now, people should know the risks that come with football. If you don't want to take the risks, don't play the game. End of story.

Doubt we lose an OL in the expansion draft. Swiston, Pencer, and Neufeld will probably all be here next season, with Neufeld having the inside track on the starting RT job.