M.O.A.B. Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 Disappointed Cotton isn't starting, thought a lot of reports were indicating he would. Noeller 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tehedra Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 I thought a lot of reports started the same; that time Cotton was starting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrg Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 I had heard they were splitting first team reps, the only place I'd ever seen that suggested he might start was here, and we spend most of the day sniffing our own farts... Fatty Liver 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 I had heard they were splitting first team reps, the only place I'd ever seen that suggested he might start was here, and we spend most of the day sniffing our own farts... TSN 1290 was talking about it earlier in the week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbrg Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 I had heard they were splitting first team reps, the only place I'd ever seen that suggested he might start was here, and we spend most of the day sniffing our own farts... TSN 1290 was talking about it earlier in the week. 1290 is a fart sniffing empire. Captain Blue, Noeller, Fraser and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deuvl Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 Brink is slated to start for the als but there's a better chance we'll see crompton in the game at some point. The reason he didn't play the riders was because of Brink's impressive first half performance. How 4 points of offence is considered impressive i'm not exactly sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraser Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 I have a bad feeling about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlue Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 I have a bad feeling about this. That burning sensation will go away eventually. Or you'll just get used to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 Would rather see Woods on there than Bryant. The thought of Washington ever seeing the field for another return makes me ill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Blue Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 Free Cotton! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 so the 2 man will be bryant and hinse i guess? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 No need to dress woods as stoudemire is mr versatility, he might be listed as a db and his primary role might be kick return/punt returns but.. he will be involved in the offence for sure, receiver or as a rb, he's more versatile than woods so no need to dress woods, no need to dress Romby because how many backup receivers do you need really JFG,Carter and "stoudemire" is more than enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty Liver Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 Nice to see Jarvis Jones finally back on the 46 man roster but it's a pity they've got him backing up the dime back. Floyd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 No need to dress woods as stoudemire is mr versatility, he might be listed as a db and his primary role might be kick return/punt returns but.. he will be involved in the offence for sure, receiver or as a rb, he's more versatile than woods so no need to dress woods, no need to dress Romby because how many backup receivers do you need really JFG,Carter and "stoudemire" is more than enough. Thanks for filling me in on Stoudermire... who knew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 No need to dress woods as stoudemire is mr versatility, he might be listed as a db and his primary role might be kick return/punt returns but.. he will be involved in the offence for sure, receiver or as a rb, he's more versatile than woods so no need to dress woods, no need to dress Romby because how many backup receivers do you need really JFG,Carter and "stoudemire" is more than enough. Thanks for filling me in on Stoudermire... who knew. Apparently, you didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 No need to dress woods as stoudemire is mr versatility, he might be listed as a db and his primary role might be kick return/punt returns but.. he will be involved in the offence for sure, receiver or as a rb, he's more versatile than woods so no need to dress woods, no need to dress Romby because how many backup receivers do you need really JFG,Carter and "stoudemire" is more than enough. Thanks for filling me in on Stoudermire... who knew. Apparently, you didn't. You do realize that there are two returners on the field for each kick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearpants Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 Nice to see Jarvis Jones finally back on the 46 man roster but it's a pity they've got him backing up the dime back. It's tough keeping up with all the Joneses on this team... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.O.A.B. Posted August 21, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 Nice to see Jarvis Jones finally back on the 46 man roster but it's a pity they've got him backing up the dime back. It's tough keeping up with all the Joneses on this team... Jarvis Jones (65) is not on the 46 yet.... the Joneses on the the current 44 are Kyle Jones (47) and Derek Jones (41) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelownabomberfan Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 Nice to see Jarvis Jones finally back on the 46 man roster but it's a pity they've got him backing up the dime back. It's tough keeping up with all the Joneses on this team... Jarvis Jones (65) is not on the 46 yet.... the Joneses on the the current 44 are Kyle Jones (47) and Derek Jones (41) Don't be so sure...this is an "Etch" defence you know... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelownabomberfan Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 I thought a lot of reports started the same; that time Cotton was starting. about cotton-pickin' time I would say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleLevel Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 Nice to see Jarvis Jones finally back on the 46 man roster but it's a pity they've got him backing up the dime back. It's tough keeping up with all the Joneses on this team... Jarvis Jones (65) is not on the 46 yet.... the Joneses on the the current 44 are Kyle Jones (47) and Derek Jones (41)Don't be so sure...this is an "Etch" defence you knowthe Bombers run defence would probably benefit from a 300lb dime back. Just make sure that Leggett is helping him over the top on every single pass play.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty Liver Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 Nice to see Jarvis Jones finally back on the 46 man roster but it's a pity they've got him backing up the dime back. It's tough keeping up with all the Joneses on this team... Jarvis Jones (65) is not on the 46 yet.... the Joneses on the the current 44 are Kyle Jones (47) and Derek Jones (41) No, I think you're wrong about that. Fact is Jarvis Jones will be playing both of these positions at the same time. A smelly old fart told me so. Sorry Grandpa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark H. Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 So much gaseous wisdom today... Floyd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKAChip Posted August 21, 2014 Report Share Posted August 21, 2014 I love a lot of things about Mike O'Shea but one thing in particular puzzles me. I totally understand the purpose of "loyalty" to his players but it seems like his loyalty only goes so far. Aaron Woods wasn't lighting the world on fire, but he was getting the job done. Grigsby at worst has contributed greatly to a few of the team's losses and at best has be maddeningly inconsistent. Woods gets pulled a few times, most recently for a dynamic PR player who showed that at least for one game, he was an improvement. Grigsby on the other hand, keeps getting plodded out there when there are other options who at least deserve an opportunity. We don't know if Cotton or Bolton or anyone else will be better (even if one could argue that there has to be someone out there who can average more than 4.3 YPC, by far worst in the league among starters) but we also didn't know that Stoudemire would be better than Woods and that switch was made. And I'd argue that Woods wasn't costing this team when at times, Grigsby has. So why be loyal to one guy and not the other. Both had backups that likely deserved a shot. And it's not even as if Grigsby "earned" this starting job out of camp either. I could make a similar argument about trotting out the rotting corpse of Romby Bryant for so many weeks but at least that was due in part to injuries. Tracker 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now