James Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 if he's an MLB, maybe slide Wild back to WIL (starter, Dunn as backup) then... and Kromah/Kuale at MLB? I personally would love that, but Etchevary seems to hate WILL LBers playing WLB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Wow - last move I thought we would make... but I sure like Kromah. Kromah-Wild-Sears would be killer Makes me believe Kuale is injured @BobIrvingCJOB: Bombers acquire l .b. Abraham Kromah from Hamilton for futures. Strictly a depth move. I have never heard of this guy in my life... I'm with Noeller - Floyd - I hope you have a really good job, because I never heard of this guy either yet you seem to know him like we know Ricky Ray lol. You have a fantastic memory I started watching the Riders when they hired Taman and then more when he hired most of the coaching staff that I wanted for the bombers... Kromah was awesome in 2012 - I think he is an instant upgrade over Dunn... but depth anywhere else Still, a bit baffled by bringing him in - we haven't even found a spot for Stoudemire (who I would much prefer to see in place of Dunn...) This does remind me a bit of when Mack would keep signing DLs or Kelly would keep signing import RECs when we actually needed help everywhere else... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuranBoldenRules Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Why would you want to see Stoudermire over Dunn? It's like bizarro world on this board today. SPuDS, Noeller, blitzmore and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Why would you want to see Stoudermire over Dunn? It's like bizarro world on this board today. Because I think Dunn is a bad player who looks better because Randle is on his side of the field. Essentially, I don't think he should even be on the team... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GCn20 Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Why would you want to see Stoudermire over Dunn? It's like bizarro world on this board today. Because I think Dunn is a bad player who looks better because Randle is on his side of the field. Essentially, I don't think he should even be on the team... You are entitled to your opinion, however, I think that you will not find too many people who agree with it. I think this is more an opinion based in personal bias than in actual reality. No offense intended towards you, we all have players we have an irrational disdain for. Mr. Perfect, kelownabomberfan, James and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GCn20 Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Why would you want to see Stoudermire over Dunn? It's like bizarro world on this board today. I would like to see Stoudermire on the field somewhere as well because I have heard he looks like a baller. I am not willing to sit a good player to find out though. Stoudermire will inevitably get his opportunity and I am willing to wait to see him. Blue-urns and JuranBoldenRules 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuranBoldenRules Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 http://www.winnipegsun.com/2014/07/12/bombers-get-abraham-kromah Must read. Look at the picture. WTF? Mr. Perfect and Atomic 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigseye Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Nice, I actually thought they'd take longer than 3 games to figure it out. Kudos to Walters for jumping when the opportunity presented itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbill2004 Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Nice, I actually thought they'd take longer than 3 games to figure it out. Kudos to Walters for jumping when the opportunity presented itself. Figure what out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Why would you want to see Stoudermire over Dunn? It's like bizarro world on this board today. Because I think Dunn is a bad player who looks better because Randle is on his side of the field. Essentially, I don't think he should even be on the team... Ok. Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigseye Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 The weakness at LB'er. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuranBoldenRules Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Why would you want to see Stoudermire over Dunn? It's like bizarro world on this board today. Because I think Dunn is a bad player who looks better because Randle is on his side of the field. Essentially, I don't think he should even be on the team... Ok. Why? Because Randle covers all 3 or 4 guys in the route on that side of the field. He comes in to fill 3 gaps when they run the ball. Really we should just play with 10 on D. blitzmore 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueandgold Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 If it takes snaps away from Kuale I love it, if it takes snaps away from Wild I hate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebusrankin Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Kromah: he played well for the Riders and if it helps our linebackers, fantastic. Stoudemire: I believe people want to see him due to his returning abilities. Plus we seem to love every new guy we bring in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Must read. Look at the picture. WTF? That's the future considerations in the trade. Atomic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuranBoldenRules Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Must read. Look at the picture. WTF? That's the future considerations in the trade. Looks kind of rusty, but he hasn't played in awhile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
road griller Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Good the old Lord Selkirk will look right in place in Hammy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomic Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Surely we could have restored the boat and used it on the OL. Another bonehead move. Floyd and road griller 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Good the old Lord Selkirk will look right in place in Hammy. Well Austin is purported to be a master of quarterdecks...or something like that. road griller 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Like this trade, Kromah is solid, remember him when he was with the riders, was a beast until he broke his leg.. This could turn in to quite the steal for the bombers. Where does he fit in? Perhaps he takes Kuales place or perhaps he's just here for depth only in case of injury. Like the trade though. 3-0 and still looking to get better. Honestly, I'd be somewhat surprised if Kromah plays this week unless Kuale is injured. I don't think 3 days is enough to really get him up to speed. One question i have about Kromah, Can he play special teams? If so, then perhaps he could be on the roster this week. It's a short week though no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 What are the terms of "future considerations". Does that just mean if we make a deal with them in the future we have to add Kromah to whatever there offer is? I've never understood how that works... Almost seems like they're just giving us a player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Kuale was heavily criticized last night in the chat room. Mainly for taking snaps off and doing nothing in a few plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraser Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 What are the terms of "future considerations". Does that just mean if we make a deal with them in the future we have to add Kromah to whatever there offer is? I've never understood how that works... Almost seems like they're just giving us a player It will depend on how much he plays. Like a conditional pick in the draft that moves up slightly if he plays more games Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 With Kromah on the IR, futures 'should' be a 5th-6th round pick... maybe bumped to a 3rd-4th if he plays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuranBoldenRules Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 Any source on what those futures are, or just speculation^? Generally that just means that it will be decided at a later date by the teams, not necessarily based on what the player does. They usually have some parameters, like by November 30th you can pick one of ten players we list from our neg list, something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now