Bombers-Als Pre Game Discussion

[Pete]

39 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said:

I could see some guys getting playing time near the end of the game. But Collaros will be playing the majority of it.

Collaros may play one series, but can't see him doing more than that mainly because:

Why risk him getting hurt, see that done that and it doesn't end well

Why give mtrl reps against our first string offence? OShea loves to keep his cards hidden as long as possible

[Noeller]

I'm of two minds... 

-Collaros and the starting offense want to prove they can get the job done after some really dismal performances of late

-Collaros has had more injuries this year than normal, and we're totally hooped without him, so why take a chance?

[HardCoreBlue]

1 hour ago, Tracker said:

Provided he does not have broken bones protruding through his skin, then yes.

Even then MOS would look at him and go you good? motioning him back onto the field.

[Booch]

1 hour ago, Pete said:

Collaros may play one series, but can't see him doing more than that mainly because:

Why risk him getting hurt, see that done that and it doesn't end well

Why give mtrl reps against our first string offence? OShea loves to keep his cards hidden as long as possible

what cards?....

[bigg jay]

6 minutes ago, Booch said:

what cards?....

They are top secret! Wouldn't want this info getting out.

[wbbfan]

54 minutes ago, Booch said:

what cards?....

the uno cards he brings to the poker table each week 

[Pete]

56 minutes ago, Booch said:

what cards?....

Maybe handing off to Brady more than 3 times in the 2nd half

[17to85]

2 hours ago, Noeller said:

Collaros has had more injuries this year than normal, and we're totally hooped without him, so why take a chance?

We have a better winning % with streveler than collaros

[SpeedFlex27]

7 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

We have a better winning % with streveler than collaros

[Goalie]

8 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

We have a better winning % with streveler than collaros

Yes cuz of Trey Vaval. 

[17to85]

Facts is facts.

[Goalie]

6 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Facts is facts.

Sure. But you’d want Zach hurt b4 the game so Strev can have 5 weeks of reps to prepare. If he comes in mid game we are hooped. 

[captaincanuck12]

11 hours ago, wbbfan said:

the uno cards he brings to the poker table each week 

I thought it was Go Fish? I can imagine the game between the coaches:

MOS -> HOGAN: Do you have any offensive game plans?
HOGAN: GO FISH!

HOGAN->YOUNGER: Do you know how to stop 2nd and long?
YOUNGER: GO FISH!

YOUNGER -> MOS: Why do you force me to play Jake Thomas?
MOS: GO FISH!

 

Edited 3 hours ago by captaincanuck12

[Blue In BC]

18 hours ago, wbbfan said:

Griffin has played corner and here, you also have to remember we are fluid with secondary positions. We flipped a ton of guys through most of the spots this year. 

 I expect they will view the game the same way no matter how it shakes down. They will treat it the same way montreal will. Partial starters, many back ups, few starters play the 2nd half. 

That may be true but we're better served in him not being limited to any specific role and removing Parker or Houston to get him on the AR.  Vaval is more likely to fill an in game injury at CB than Griffin IMO. That's not a bad thing or a knock, just a recognition of his versatility.

 

Yes I'd remove Ayers to get him on but O'Shea won't. It might be moot because Woods is nicked and might not play this week.