Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

1. Streveler. Can’t pass. Can’t run. Can’t do ****. He’s cooked. 
 

2. Streveler. 2 interceptions = 14 points. Could have been way more 

3. Streveler. The D gave up 19 points. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Mike said:

Not a single play on defense

Some people complained about Richie Hall's defenses...

I like Younger a lot but they looked pretty bad today. Admittedly maybe it would be a bit better if the offense did anything consistently. 

Posted

Proving in Ham why this club is in free fall and in tear down mode.....Streve didn't impress me even in garbage time...Why have we got a back-up qb in Wilson and are afraid to at least give him a few reps when Streveler was stinking the joint out....Typical Osh bull$hit

Posted
Just now, Captain Blue said:

Some people complained about Richie Hall's defenses...

I like Younger a lot but they looked pretty bad today. Admittedly maybe it would be a bit better if the offense did anything consistently. 

They gave up 18 points. Some of these posts are delusional. We lost by 11 and our QB gave them 14 points. 

Posted (edited)

Ham did press the issue at all...no need to...they played safe smart ball

Thinking the defence was good is just stupid..when Ham wanted/needed to...they did and we couldnt stop it

2 minutes ago, Goalie said:

They gave up 18 points. Some of these posts are delusional. We lost by 11 and our QB gave them 14 points. 

So yeah..  some of these 👆 posts are delusional...and if defence was so good...they would have gave up 3's or got ball back

Edited by Booch
Posted
4 minutes ago, Captain Blue said:

Some people complained about Richie Hall's defenses...

I like Younger a lot but they looked pretty bad today. Admittedly maybe it would be a bit better if the offense did anything consistently. 

it’s because he’s got nothing for a DL 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Booch said:

Ham did press the issue at all...no need to...they played safe smart ball

Thinking the defence was good is just stupid..when Ham wanted/needed to...they did and we couldnt stop it

So yeah..  some of these 👆 posts are delusional...and if defence was so good...they would have gave up 3's or got ball back

They did give up 3s. 

Posted
Just now, wbbfan said:

it’s because he’s got nothing for a DL 

Could absolutely be the case, we need an infusion of talent there. I do think he is not overly interested in rushing the passer, said as much last year and this year.

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Captain Blue said:

Some people complained about Richie Hall's defenses...

I like Younger a lot but they looked pretty bad today. Admittedly maybe it would be a bit better if the offense did anything consistently. 

Richie Hall preached making plays on the ball and behind the LOS.  Now we just watch the other team run circles around us and hope they miss a couple throws.

The aggression has been coached right out of the first two levels of this defense in the past 2 seasons.

Edited by JuranBoldenRules
Posted
2 minutes ago, bryan35 said:

Strev gave them the ball at the 7 yard line. Don't hang that on the D.

Yeah...no **** Sherlock...but they also didnt hold them to 3 either...not an ideal situation dropped on them...but an elite defence maybe holds them to 3....ours is nowhere close to elite 

Its a 3 phase game...each phase needs to compliment and pick each other up too

Fact of matter...across the board...we are not good...we have zero depth...and we refuse to try anyone in the place of guys who aren't cutting it

Posted
8 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

Richie Hall preached making plays on the ball and behind the LOS.  Now we just watch the other team run circles around us and hope they miss a couple throws.

The aggression has been coached right out of the first two levels of this defense in the past 2 seasons.

No argument here, I loved Richie Hall and give a ton of credit to his defensive work for our run of success. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Booch said:

Yeah...no **** Sherlock...but they also didnt hold them to 3 either...not an ideal situation dropped on them...but an elite defence maybe holds them to 3....ours is nowhere close to elite 

Its a 3 phase game...each phase needs to compliment and pick each other up too

Fact of matter...across the board...we are not good...we have zero depth...and we refuse to try anyone in the place of guys who aren't cutting it

Don't think anyone said they are elite.

Posted
Just now, bryan35 said:

Don't think anyone said they are elite.

I would hope not...but still...expecting a defensive stand and forcing a fg shouldn't be impossible task regardless of circumstances 

Championship teams do that...we used to...4...5 yrs ago

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...