Dreamcatcher Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 13 hours ago, Goalie said: Griffin was getting owned just like everyone else the last 2 games. Seems people don’t understand there’s a ratio in the cfl either. Cuz how the **** does he start. Everyone loves the other teams cast offs. Griffin. Cobb. Mitchell who is apparently dumb as rocks. Hi. From what I was seeing, he was overcompensating for others not being in position. I believe he could be inserted for Bridges, since Bridges was having considerable difficulty against Calgary receivers in both games. The other spot I am not convinced about is Parker at Safety. He started the season great, but not so much against Calgary. I am used to Alexander and his major league hits I guess. Perhaps this has more to do with our front 7 than I believe? Blue28 and BigBlueFanatic 1 1
Bigblue204 Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago (edited) 14 hours ago, Goalie said: Griffin was getting owned just like everyone else the last 2 games. Seems people don’t understand there’s a ratio in the cfl either. Cuz how the **** does he start. Everyone loves the other teams cast offs. Griffin. Cobb. Mitchell who is apparently dumb as rocks. Are they not starting 8 NAT pretty regularly? Nuef Kol Wallace Demski Brady Cler Kramdi Thomas/Lawson Even if they only start 7....Griffin is American so he'd just replace I don't know...Bridges Edited 17 hours ago by Bigblue204 Piggy 1 and bigg jay 2
Booch Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 21 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said: Are they not starting 8 NAT pretty regularly? Nuef Kol Wallace Demski Brady Cler Kramdi Thomas/Lawson yup.....if we go 3 national olineman we only need 1 guy any given snap on defence Piggy 1 and Bigblue204 2
Blue In BC Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 15 hours ago, Booch said: If I was Jones id not agree to be "hurt" so we would have to either roster him...ask him to join PR (which i sure he'd say no thanks to)...or just release him...cause I sure he wants to play but also not be a distraction talking bout it here. He'd be picked up in a heartbeat and in some teams lineup immediately.... He's getting a full pay check without any risk of injury. That's not a bad gig. So far neither have declined to be extended on the 1 game IR. I don't understand why he's not on the AR though in place of Ayers most probably. Noeller 1
captaincanuck12 Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago *sigh* same lineup from last week. Remind me what the definition of insanity is? At least Calgary lost last night. Only 13 more games guys... we can stick it out. I will be in Calgary for the August 9th game. I wonder how badly we'll get schooled then. Blue-urns 1
rebusrankin Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago Ball on for Novak is the only change. Bridges has been awful the past few games, Parker has had some struggles the past few and we make no changes. Does this season feel like 2004 to anybody else?
17to85 Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago Just now, rebusrankin said: Ball on for Novak is the only change. Aye yi yi.... ******* Kyle Walters.... BomberBall. 1
BRT Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 2 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: Ball on for Novak is the only change. Bridges has been awful the past few games, Parker has had some struggles the past few and we make no changes. Does this season feel like 2004 to anybody else? I can not help but agree. Don't get the chance to post much here. Retirement is keeping me Uber busy. However IMHO this starting lineup as posted is the weakest Bomber Lineup I have seen in a very long time. No speed receivers, poor DL and OL, secondary is weak (and that is a complement) and I am not even sure about how effective our starting QB will be. rebusrankin, Blue-urns and Piggy 1 3
rebusrankin Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 6 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Aye yi yi.... ******* Kyle Walters.... Seriously? I say freaking MOS. He seems to be the one focused on having loads of guys who only play teams on the roster. Blue-urns 1
Tracker Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 1 hour ago, Bigblue204 said: Bridges still in the line up.... In the Freep today (and the stuff there is mostly fluff) Bridges exonerated himself completely and was not challenged. What we are seeing is another episode of O'Shea's "I chose him and he's not going anywhere" attitude. Does not bode well for Saturday's game. Blue-urns, Piggy 1, rebusrankin and 1 other 4
rebusrankin Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago Bridges is the new Roc Carmichal it seems. BigBlueFanatic 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago If Younger/O'Shea endorse Bridges' decision making on that touchdown it speaks to their system on D having no ability to manage a QB outside the pocket. Most immediate threat if you're a corner with nothing but green turf behind you is a receiver, not the QB 30+ yards away who might run. Bridges' quote from yesterday sounds like a guy who has no ******* idea what his assignment is after the first 3 seconds of the play. Field corner unless they are in a 2 high cut look, your only true responsibility is to not let the widest guy behind you in basically every single defensive coverage in this country. BigBlueFanatic, Stickem, BomberBall. and 4 others 7
17to85 Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 32 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: Seriously? I say freaking MOS. He seems to be the one focused on having loads of guys who only play teams on the roster. /S..... BigBlueFanatic 1
Arnold_Palmer Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 11 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: If Younger/O'Shea endorse Bridges' decision making on that touchdown it speaks to their system on D having no ability to manage a QB outside the pocket. Most immediate threat if you're a corner with nothing but green turf behind you is a receiver, not the QB 30+ yards away who might run. Bridges' quote from yesterday sounds like a guy who has no ******* idea what his assignment is after the first 3 seconds of the play. Field corner unless they are in a 2 high cut look, your only true responsibility is to not let the widest guy behind you in basically every single defensive coverage in this country. Bridges stinks. He’s being picked on week in and week out, i didn’t really like his comments about him saying we need to be better oppposed to I need to be better. I know it’s a collective unit but man stop pointing the finger, take responsibility. rebusrankin and Piggy 1 2
BomberBall. Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago I knew this would happen, but it’s still bloody infuriating. Blue-urns, rebusrankin, BigBlueFanatic and 1 other 2 2
rebusrankin Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 20 minutes ago, Arnold_Palmer said: Bridges stinks. He’s being picked on week in and week out, i didn’t really like his comments about him saying we need to be better oppposed to I need to be better. I know it’s a collective unit but man stop pointing the finger, take responsibility. I thought we had this great culture and the vets held guys accountable. Guess that's about as true as there being a Santa Claus.
17to85 Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 3 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: I thought we had this great culture and the vets held guys accountable. Guess that's about as true as there being a Santa Claus. Doesn't work when the vets are a big part of the problem. GCJenks, rebusrankin, Booch and 2 others 1 4
Noeller Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago The thing that makes me chuckle here is that people are posting the daily reports from practice, which clearly stated there were no real changes. DT even said Ball likely on for Novak, otherwise everything the same..... ...and then everyone freaks out when the depth chart comes out. If there were going to be any changes they would have been installed day 1 of the week. I don't know enough to know what's right or wrong in this situation, but clearly they feel it's mental mistakes more than lack of talent. If they lose to a bad Toronto team, there's going to be a lot more questions.... bb1 and Fatty Liver 2
Mike Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago This isn’t ever gonna be fixed unless we move on from O’Shea Booch and Stickem 1 1
Arnold_Palmer Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Mike said: This isn’t ever gonna be fixed unless we move on from O’Shea I would say his rope is long however because this is a grey cup year and we don’t atleast host a playoff game or make it to the grey cup I could see that being a possibility . BigBlueFanatic 1
Booch Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 2 hours ago, Blue In BC said: He's getting a full pay check without any risk of injury. That's not a bad gig. So far neither have declined to be extended on the 1 game IR. I don't understand why he's not on the AR though in place of Ayers most probably. Eventually tho....guys wanna play....and are not happy not Just now, Mike said: This isn’t ever gonna be fixed unless we move on from O’Shea yup...he is the problem ya buts and all not shocked...expected this same ol same ol lineup and the addition of another redundant ST only guy...ho will get minimal reps at that...not even the best ST option , and not see the light of day for any defensive reps....and if he does boy are we in trouble and severely hemorrhaging in legit talent Opportunity to add a couple guys if for anything just to gauge what the difference is...and we fail again...cause basically Osh is brain dead and wants to seem like he the wisest guy in the league and plays his bias over talent or best roster WE have had more poor/questionable games this yr really than good ones...yet we roll status quo....pathetic I hate to say this as I never widh on us losing but I hope we get tight spanked again...and next week too....only way we gonna see changes...brutal all around 4 minutes ago, Arnold_Palmer said: I would say his rope is long however because this is a grey cup year and we don’t atleast host a playoff game or make it to the grey cup I could see that being a possibility . his rope doesnt deserve to be long anymore...he has used up his past good will wih success...years agi....from Manageent...he should have zero rope
Stickem Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago IF we get lambasted by an argo club on the limp, Miller has to call Osh and Walters in for a little discussion....The management and the head coaching has to be questioned...When it 'looks like' the club is not even making an effort to change things up, especially after the last 2 games, it has to be challenged...not by just the fans, but by someone in a higher position...This does not bode well for attendance at the Princess and that's where it's going to hurt Tracker 1
Mark H. Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 1 minute ago, Stickem said: This does not bode well for attendance at the Princess and that's where it's going to hurt Absolutely. If this continues, Manitobans will vote with their feet. Hotdogs and beer can be had anywhere.
JuranBoldenRules Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Mike said: This isn’t ever gonna be fixed unless we move on from O’Shea WWJ(amie Elizondo)D Noeller 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now