wbbfan Posted 7 hours ago Author Report Posted 7 hours ago 2 hours ago, Super Duper Negatron said: Vaval will break one. He’s 2nd in the league in pr yards, despite all the other guys having a game played on him, and first in avg. he’s only got 3 ko returns but his 29 yards per is in the top group of guys. Most of whom have broken one and have 3-4 times more returns this year. Hes been exceptional so far, when he does break one he’s probably going to go on a run and have silly averages. Im interested to see what Logan can do as an offensive rotational guy, but if he isn’t healthy soon he might not have a path to make the AR. On top of that, vaval looked really good at times at db in pre season. Starman115 and Super Duper Negatron 2
3rdand1.5 Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago Good All our DB's All our LB's (that played) Wheetfall Eli with a TD...... Specials BC's Team Ted shirts 2and 0 Bad 2nd half Zach Didn't love some of teh play calls on O especially in the 3rd O-line wasn't great Willie getting himself ejected Clercuius had a bad game, no ifs and butts, if he is hurt sit him and let him get healthy Ugly Listening to TSN go on and on and on about Rourke.... Lack of depth at NI reciever-Clercuous played hurt and Demski clearly was hurting.....We need better depth here Lack of D-line depth....more specifically end....Willie and Vaughters are older, and while still good, I strongly believe they need to be spelled off more 1 minute ago, wbbfan said: He’s 2nd in the league in pr yards, despite all the other guys having a game played on him, and first in avg. he’s only got 3 ko returns but his 29 yards per is in the top group of guys. Most of whom have broken one and have 3-4 times more returns this year. Hes been exceptional so far, when he does break one he’s probably going to go on a run and have silly averages. Im interested to see what Logan can do as an offensive rotational guy, but if he isn’t healthy soon he might not have a path to make the AR. On top of that, vaval looked really good at times at db in pre season. I also question the bolded part....I think each week that path is getting narrower Piggy 1, wbbfan, Arnold_Palmer and 1 other 4
brett_c_b Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, 17to85 said: Our DL is so old... they desperately need an injection of youth and speed at the position. Lawson was the only guy being disruptive out there, everything else came from linebackers. Jokes on you, the game summary I read that was negative about everything raved about Jake Thomas blocking the entire line by himself, already forwarded it to coach for his bulletin board Piggy 1 1
Booch Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, rebusrankin said: Pearson needs to get a shot Several guys need a shot...and a couple need a seat on the PR or IR Our 2 older ends would thrive with a youthful upside rotation end...and consistent inside push with a combo of Adams...Lawson and Woods... Did Korn get more than 2 reps? Even so he not cfl caliber...we seen all too well how many reps Thomas got and how for the majority of the reps hes just pointless...and times he does show a lil push in pocket has nothing left or ability to get off his block and make a play...let alone have any backside pursuit...he needs to be off roster...his "glue" isn't serving any purpose...we have more than enough glue guys on defence And T.Jones needs to be impactfull and noticeable if he your MLB and make plays all over the place..and he isn't...hes decent in the box or crashing down...but in space...coverage...or sidlene to sideline hes a liability and basically invisible... When BO is back we be better served using Person for Cooley spot...Bailey for Weitz...did he even see feild?..insert J.Jones for one of T.Jones or wilson and allow Ayers and J.Jones to take majority of reps...Griffin too should be our SAM...he'd be a league allstar as a full-time starter... For what Sterns gives us and has shown I'd also give Mitchell the next games...he if dialed in is a legit threat and woukd give more space for the other receivers to work..Sterns is just run of he mill average... 39 minutes ago, 3rdand1.5 said: Good All our DB's All our LB's (that played) Wheetfall Eli with a TD...... Specials BC's Team Ted shirts 2and 0 Bad 2nd half Zach Didn't love some of teh play calls on O especially in the 3rd O-line wasn't great Willie getting himself ejected Clercuius had a bad game, no ifs and butts, if he is hurt sit him and let him get healthy Ugly Listening to TSN go on and on and on about Rourke.... Lack of depth at NI reciever-Clercuous played hurt and Demski clearly was hurting.....We need better depth here Lack of D-line depth....more specifically end....Willie and Vaughters are older, and while still good, I strongly believe they need to be spelled off more I also question the bolded part....I think each week that path is getting narrower Why we didnt pick up Hakanuva is baffling...he'd have offered more than what we have behind our starters...I'd even try 3 national recievers with him in lineup to free up an import for defence or oline... wbbfan, Piggy 1 and BigBlueFanatic 3
17to85 Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, Fatty Liver said: That's two games BC has been unable to establish a running game with a pretty good running back, the defence as an entity is playing superbly. They are playing superbly... now imagine what they might do with a better defensive line... wbbfan and rebusrankin 2
SpeedFlex27 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago I know no one feel sorry for me but... being Saturday even with a monsoon I had things to do. The plan was to pvr bothj games then around 6;30 or 7pm MDT, sit down & start watching the Bomber game & staying off social media so I wouldn't know who was winning. Then after the Bomber game, watch the Ottawa@Stamps game from earlier yesterday. A Saturday night of CFL which I love. So, about 6:30 pm when I finally had some free time, I went downstairs, sat down turned on the tv only to discover that I forgot to pvr both games. Missed the entire Stamps vs Ottawa game but was "lucky" to be able to watch the last 11:49 seconds of the fourth quarter of the Bombers@Lions game. I can tell you, my wife knew from upstairs how unhappy I was... My drink I had planned to sip on, some Canadian Club was finished in one gulp. I could have sworn I pvr'd both games. Senior moment.
wbbfan Posted 5 hours ago Author Report Posted 5 hours ago 28 minutes ago, 17to85 said: They are playing superbly... now imagine what they might do with a better defensive line... A couple adjustments and we’d have a better D than 21. Jake 10 reps or less per game. Kyrie out to pasture, Jjones on with tony sliding to wil and sitting on passing downs situationally, get an end on to rotate, maybe work vaval in on the D some. SpeedFlex27, rebusrankin, BigBlueFanatic and 1 other 4
Booch Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 48 minutes ago, 17to85 said: They are playing superbly... now imagine what they might do with a better defensive line... And 2 better linebackers....well 3 really...Griffin should be sam Piggy 1 and rebusrankin 2
Fatty Liver Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 35 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: I know no one feel sorry for me but... being Saturday even with a monsoon I had things to do. The plan was to pvr bothj games then around 6;30 or 7pm MDT, sit down & start watching the Bomber game & staying off social media so I wouldn't know who was winning. Then after the Bomber game, watch the Ottawa@Stamps game from earlier yesterday. A Saturday night of CFL which I love. So, about 6:30 pm when I finally had some free time, I went downstairs, sat down turned on the tv only to discover that I forgot to pvr both games. Missed the entire Stamps vs Ottawa game but was "lucky" to be able to watch the last 11:49 seconds of the fourth quarter of the Bombers@Lions game. I can tell you, my wife knew from upstairs how unhappy I was... My drink I had planned to sip on, some Canadian Club was finished in one gulp. I could have sworn I pvr'd both games. Senior moment. If you have a VPN you can re-watch the games on CFL+ right now, Germany is a good location to view from. If not Waders27 will probably have the condensed broadcast up on YouTube within a few days.
Pete Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago (edited) I thought Thomas had a decent game, and the dline had a lot of pressures, leading to interceptions and near ones. Its much improved to ly. The only criticism is that we didn't sign a quality cdn in off season such as Green or an olineman so we could have a di defensive lineman to rotate in and develop ie persons.I do also agree that Kornelson isn't a god use of roster spot Edited 3 hours ago by Pete
JuranBoldenRules Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, Fatty Liver said: If you have a VPN you can re-watch the games on CFL+ right now, Germany is a good location to view from. If not Waders27 will probably have the condensed broadcast up on YouTube within a few days. CFL should really do a "game in 30" kind of deal. Really easy to do with football take out all the breaks and a bit of time between plays. rebusrankin 1
Booch Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Pete said: I thought Thomas had a decent game, and the dline had a lot of pressures, leading to interceptions and near ones. Its much improved to ly. The only criticism is that we didn't sign a quality cdn in off season such as Green or an olineman so we could have a di defensive lineman to rotate in and develop ie persons.I do also agree that Kornelson isn't a god use of roster spot The pressures thst lead to the int's was direct result of Lawson...not thomas Piggy 1 and wbbfan 2
Noeller Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 42 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: CFL should really do a "game in 30" kind of deal. Really easy to do with football take out all the breaks and a bit of time between plays. Bombers produced a 25-minute condensed game.... Watched that this afternoon. WinnipegGordo and wbbfan 2
Fatty Liver Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 26 minutes ago, Noeller said: Bombers produced a 25-minute condensed game.... Watched that this afternoon. Noeller and wbbfan 2
Brandon Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 5 hours ago, Fatty Liver said: That's two games BC has been unable to establish a running game with a pretty good running back, the defence as an entity is playing superbly. Butler was super effective as a dump off receiver in the back field back in 2022. It appears Pierce hasn't watched the tape from back then when it worked. 1 hour ago, Pete said: I thought Thomas had a decent game, and the dline had a lot of pressures, leading to interceptions and near ones. If you have the game on PVR or have the link on YouTube re watch Thomas. I watched for him on every play and he was getting rag dolled and tossed around with ease. I think he pushed back Couture only twice in the whole game, otherwise he was getting flinged around with great ease. Piggy 1 1
Booch Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Brandon said: Butler was super effective as a dump off receiver in the back field back in 2022. It appears Pierce hasn't watched the tape from back then when it worked. If you have the game on PVR or have the link on YouTube re watch Thomas. I watched for him on every play and he was getting rag dolled and tossed around with ease. I think he pushed back Couture only twice in the whole game, otherwise he was getting flinged around with great ease. Yeah...that's pretty much it...on the Holm int i believe..Lawson had penetration and vaughters came thru and drilled masoli...Thomas got engaged and thrown to the turf...one of many instances...he serves zero effectiveness out there...1...maybe 2 plays a game is not optimal...that's being generous too.. Piggy 1 1
deepsixemtoboyd Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 20 hours ago, Noeller said: Agreed... I'm just hoping he's knocking off rust and not getting progressively worse. I don't know enough to know enough. Well, he’s definitely not getting better! He’s seven years on the wrong side of 30. His arm strength and escapability have both diminished, even considerably. And Osh will ride him to the bitter end. Strev, 7 yrs younger, was light years better last week. Tracker and Booch 2
Booch Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, deepsixemtoboyd said: Well, he’s definitely not getting better! He’s seven years on the wrong side of 30. His arm strength and escapability have both diminished, even considerably. And Osh will ride him to the bitter end. Strev, 7 yrs younger, was light years better last week. I think ZC also now is a bit skittish mentally and spooks too easily now...well since 2023 when he got popped in that edm game...his slide started after he got back from that and hes never looked the same..well not consistently or sustainably Piggy 1 and deepsixemtoboyd 2
deepsixemtoboyd Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 21 hours ago, JuranBoldenRules said: It's a matter of protection. Yeah he's not what he was in 2021. But the protection is not good enough and far worse than it was in 2021 too. It's been getting progressively worse. He needs a clean pocket. You build the team to do that. It's the only way we win. You figure out kick coverage, catching punts, whatever spots you need to, but you get a OL out there that can pass protect with whoever you need any roster designation. Disagree that protection was the issue last night. Collaros had adequate time for the most part (was he even sacked?) and was going through his progressions. With the two pics, he threw off his back foot. Rainbow throws. The fact that he doesn’t eat those or throw it out of bounds is not on the oline. Edited 1 hour ago by deepsixemtoboyd Booch, Piggy 1 and Tracker 3
Noeller Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) Was sacked at least once and rushed a few times. I think JBRs point (and forgive me if I'm wrong here) is that maybe Zach needs better than "adequate time" in the pocket to be lethal. I still believe he has the ability... But he needs more around him than he did in 2022 when he lit the world on fire. Now, you can have the debate about "he's making too much money to need that much help" debate all you want, but the point remains... He needs a very specific set of tools to be truly successful. Edited 1 hour ago by Noeller Tracker 1
WinnipegGordo Posted 54 minutes ago Report Posted 54 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Noeller said: Bombers produced a 25-minute condensed game.... Watched that this afternoon. And TSN and CFL normally post 10 minute highlight packages shortly after the game ends. Noeller 1
deepsixemtoboyd Posted 49 minutes ago Report Posted 49 minutes ago 6 minutes ago, Noeller said: Was sacked at least once and rushed a few times. I think JBRs point (and forgive me if I'm wrong here) is that maybe Zach needs better than "adequate time" in the pocket to be lethal. I still believe he has the ability... But he needs more around him than he did in 2022 when he lit the world on fire. Now, you can have the debate about "he's making too much money to need that much help" debate all you want, but the point remains... He needs a very specific set of tools to be truly successful. OK, so we’re agreed that his skills are diminished. And, it would appear he needs quite a bit of help just to be more than meh, let alone “lethal”. I think that his own diminishment is by far the biggest factor in his struggles and that the o-line was definitely good enough yesterday for a good quarterback to be successful. And he was…on one drive. After that, not so much. The bombers need a plan, immediate and mid to longer term, that takes their starter’s diminished skills into account. Maybe they have one. But if the best predictor of future behaviour is past behavior, the bombers’ plan is likely to ride this veteran way too long (exhibit a: see one Adam Bighill). Booch and Tracker 2
Booch Posted 48 minutes ago Report Posted 48 minutes ago 21 minutes ago, deepsixemtoboyd said: Disagree that protection was the issue last night. Collaros had adequate time for the most part (was he even sacked?) and was going through his progressions. With the two pics, he threw off his back foot. Rainbow throws. The fact that he doesn’t eat those or throw it out of bounds is not on the oline. Yup...I rewatched and the line wasn't an issue like some make it out to be...it was more a ZC issue..the ones that were apparent last yr already 14 minutes ago, Noeller said: Was sacked at least once and rushed a few times. I think JBRs point (and forgive me if I'm wrong here) is that maybe Zach needs better than "adequate time" in the pocket to be lethal. I still believe he has the ability... But he needs more around him than he did in 2022 when he lit the world on fire. Now, you can have the debate about "he's making too much money to need that much help" debate all you want, but the point remains... He needs a very specific set of tools to be truly successful. And that's the indicator in a player...especially at QB that they have or are in regression... 1 minute ago, deepsixemtoboyd said: OK, so we’re agreed that his skills are diminished. And, it would appear he needs quite a bit of help just to be more than meh, let alone “lethal”. I think that his own diminishment is by far the biggest factor in his struggles and that the o-line was definitely good enough yesterday for a good quarterback to be successful. And he was…on one drive. After that, not so much. The bombers need a plan, immediate and mid to longer term, that takes their starter’s diminished skills into account. Maybe they have one. But if the best predictor of future behaviour is past behavior, the bombers’ plan is likely to ride this veteran way too long (exhibit a: see one Adam Bighill). Exactly what I touched on...the fact to we resigned him site unseen for 2026 as well was a bone head move His scripted first drive was good...after...hit and miss and the hits were not elite qb style hitting And we are saddled with Osh who will stick with a vet/fav/bias as long as they not in a wheel chair...and that's not good either deepsixemtoboyd and Tracker 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now