Should be a big crowd, should lay a beating on a very bad team. Keep it rolling, boys!

LETS ******* GO!!!!!!

WE won,in spite of ZC F ups. Not sure we win Cup though,,

Did not think they would score a TD there but very happy to be wrong. Collaros was freaking awful but put one good drive through to Dave us. Lots to work on but a W for the good guys sends the crowd home happy. 

Almost lost to the worst team in the league. No complaints though about that final winning drive, other than what the hell was Brady doing in there when he's injured?

THAT was a gross game.

But a win is a win. 

We need to be comfortable in bringing in Strev to run his packages when the O is faltering.
 

Just now, Piggy 1 said:

WE won,in spite of ZC F ups. Not sure we win Cup though,,

And who drove the field for the winning TD?

OL was in total shambles once Wallace went out.

Oliviera basically out for last 20 mins of game.

Basically have no consistent reliable targets out there.

3 minutes ago, brett_c_b said:

Is there someone disappointed next to you?

Buddy, I'm satisfied...and tonight, that's all that matters 🤪

One thing that doesn't matter now but the Wilson incomplete at the end of the game somewhat looked like a catch and fumble. Especially give the Hamilton "catch" earlier. 

Edited August 24, 20241 yr by Captain Blue

Can’t say they deserved it but I’ll take the win.  ZC played like dog **** until the final drive.  I’ll give him a bit of a break as the oline was decimated.

I'm freakin' out about the O Line.......for cripes sake '''losing 2 in one game ...My man Bryant and then the rook ...ouch.....We;re going to have to scamble to fix that

Just now, Captain Blue said:

One thing that doesn't matter know but the Wilson incomplete at the end of the game somewhat looked like a catch and fumble. Especially give the Hamilton "catch" earlier. 

It wasn't even debatable. Catches it, brings it down, turns, stretches, fumbles.

Ugly win but better than winning by a walk off Rouge lol. 

Barker looks the same he did 20 years ago

1 minute ago, Super Duper Negatron said:

It wasn't even debatable. Catches it, brings it down, turns, stretches, fumbles.

Thought so but was caught off guard with Ford rambling about how clearly it isn't even a debate 

1 minute ago, Super Duper Negatron said:

It wasn't even debatable. Catches it, brings it down, turns, stretches, fumbles.

They would argue that he was going to the ground and needed to keep possession the whole way. His elbow was so close to touching, it was an amazing play by the DB.

Jake would've been the next O-lineman up. Wearning #62 I think.

All right, someone with some real football knowledge explained to me why Wilson 's catch was ruled incomplete at the 1?  Nielsen and Ford didn't give anything

1 minute ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

And who drove the field for the winning TD?

OL was in total shambles once Wallace went out.

Oliviera basically out for last 20 mins of game.

Basically have no consistent reliable targets out there.

What’s the downside of bringing in Strev for a couple of sets even if it doesn’t work? I love Zac always have and always will but changing the pace when things aren’t happening is okay. See how Strev can deal with the o’s injuries. If he doesn’t produce after a couple of sets put Zac back on. 

Jones was god awful on D.

Apparently needs someone to tell him where to be.  Really poor effort on a lot of plays too, noticeably vs the run.

1 minute ago, Stickem said:

I'm freakin' out about the O Line.......for cripes sake '''losing 2 in one game ...My man Bryant and then the rook ...ouch.....We;re going to have to scamble to fix that

Honestly think this was a huge factor in the lack luster offence and ZC. Yes ZC had some dumb throws but you can’t blame him for throwing under pressure and getting sacked when we have no line blocking for him. Going to be very difficult beating the Riders next week with the amount of injuries on the line. 

Just now, Plaxico said:

They would argue that he was going to the ground and needed to keep possession the whole way. His elbow was so close to touching, it was an amazing play by the DB.

Doesn't matter RE the ground in this particular play.  He comes down facing his own endzone and turns to the other one to reach.  That completes the catch before he's going to ground.

Would like to know which ref waved it off.  The side judge was spotting the ball.

1 minute ago, captaincanuck12 said:

All right, someone with some real football knowledge explained to me why Wilson 's catch was ruled incomplete at the 1?  Nielsen and Ford didn't give anything

"In the process of making the catch, the receiver was going to the ground, thus needed to hold onto the ball the whole way."

 

-CFL, probably

Just now, JuranBoldenRules said:

Jones was god awful on D.

Apparently needs someone to tell him where to be.  Really poor effort on a lot of plays too, noticeably vs the run.

To be honest I think one takeaway from this game is that some of the backups are backups for a reason. First example is Eli who still struggles to pass block. But the new LBs struggled too.

Just now, JuranBoldenRules said:

That completes the catch before he's going to ground.

This is debatable. 

1 minute ago, Bomber_fanaddict said:

 Going to be very difficult beating the Riders next week with the amount of injuries on the line. 

They have enough Canadian starters to put 4 Americans on the OL.

4 minutes ago, Captain Blue said:

One thing that doesn't matter now but the Wilson incomplete at the end of the game somewhat looked like a catch and fumble. Especially give the Hamilton "catch" earlier. 

Great point. The only difference is Wilson’s hit the turf but it seemed Wison  turned after he caught it so surviving contact is moot and more of a fumble and recovery?