17to85 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 Remember when people called the 2011 bombers the worst 7 win team ever? (When they were 7-1 or whatever they were) Well the Riders are the worst 8 win team I have ever seen. Noeller 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigseye Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 6 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Remember when people called the 2011 bombers the worst 7 win team ever? (When they were 7-1 or whatever they were) Well the Riders are the worst 8 win team I have ever seen. By far the worst but their luck is going to run out. You can only rely on other teams to gift you wins before it catches up to you. There is nothing scary about this version of the Riders, without the miscues of their opponents they wouldn't even have half of those wins. They will be royally embarrassed come playoff time no matter who they face. Tracker, Noeller, Wanna-B-Fanboy and 1 other 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 blue_gold_84 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripper Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 The Ticats will have to designate another player on roster as a qb then. You have to have 3 on the roster. Am I wrong? I was pretty sure that's how it worked. No cost savings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpan85 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 No you don’t have to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 June Jones is a wild man!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripper Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 52 minutes ago, Jpan85 said: No you don’t have to Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 4 hours ago, Mr Dee said: Dave Ritchie and Brendan Taman did it first. Floyd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szaroz71 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 I thought they still have to have 3 players listed as qb... even if only 2 are actually qb. This is from the CFL game rule ratio. Each team may have a maximum of 44 players, including 3 players who shall be identified as quarterbacks and 41 other players, of whom not more than 20 may be international players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sard Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, szaroz71 said: I thought they still have to have 3 players listed as qb... even if only 2 are actually qb. This is from the CFL game rule ratio. Each team may have a maximum of 44 players, including 3 players who shall be identified as quarterbacks and 41 other players, of whom not more than 20 may be international players. Key word there is may... does not say that they need to have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, szaroz71 said: I thought they still have to have 3 players listed as qb... even if only 2 are actually qb. This is from the CFL game rule ratio. Each team may have a maximum of 44 players, including 3 players who shall be identified as quarterbacks and 41 other players, of whom not more than 20 may be international players. Not a bad idea for the Bombers actually... Dressler or Demski as the third QB...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, Sard said: Key word there is may... does not say that they need to have. Go easy, those gappers have trouble with basic English. Edited September 26, 2018 by 17to85 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpan85 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 4 minutes ago, Floyd said: Not a bad idea for the Bombers actually... Dressler or Demski as the third QB...? Can only play special teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szaroz71 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Go easy, those tappers have trouble with basic English. It says 3 players "shall be identified as quarterbacks". Who's having trouble with English? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, szaroz71 said: It says 3 players "shall be identified as quarterbacks". Who's having trouble with English? It says maximum of 44 players, no mention of a minimum. Not only did you expose your lack of reading comprehension, you doubled down on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szaroz71 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, 17to85 said: It says maximum of 44 players, no mention of a minimum. Not only did you expose your lack of reading comprehension, you doubled down on it. Yes, maximum 44 players, with 3 of them who shall be identified as quarterbacks I can read the rules just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, szaroz71 said: Yes, maximum 44 players, with 3 of them who shall be identified as quarterbacks I can read the rules just fine. Yeah just don't understand what you've read. The roster rules talk about maximum numbers. You can't have 44 players with only 2 qbs, you can have 43 with 2 qbs though. Nor can you have 44 players with 4 qbs. Rod Black 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szaroz71 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 1 minute ago, 17to85 said: Yeah just don't understand what you've read. The roster rules talk about maximum numbers. You can't have 44 players with only 2 qbs, you can have 43 with 2 qbs though. Nor can you have 44 players with 4 qbs. Well, this is what is written... Each team may have a maximum of 44 players, including 3 players who shall be identified as quarterbacks and 41 other players, of whom not more than 20 may be international players. ...the way I interpreted this, was that each team had to have 3 players identified as QB, whether they are QB's or not, but they had to have 3 listed on the roster. Not saying that I am right, just how I read it. I guess we'll see when Hamilton posts their lineup for game day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 25 minutes ago, szaroz71 said: Well, this is what is written... Each team may have a maximum of 44 players, including 3 players who shall be identified as quarterbacks and 41 other players, of whom not more than 20 may be international players. ...the way I interpreted this, was that each team had to have 3 players identified as QB, whether they are QB's or not, but they had to have 3 listed on the roster. Not saying that I am right, just how I read it. I guess we'll see when Hamilton posts their lineup for game day. Yes but like I said, your reading comprehension fails. Rod Black 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szaroz71 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 51 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Yes but like I said, your reading comprehension fails. Why? Other than you trying to be insulting, it says 3 shall be identified as quarterbacks. What part of that do you not comprehend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Black Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, 17to85 said: Yeah just don't understand what you've read. The roster rules talk about maximum numbers. You can't have 44 players with only 2 qbs, you can have 43 with 2 qbs though. Nor can you have 44 players with 4 qbs. Szcrotum71, 17to85 is correct in his interpretation of the rule as constructed. It makes the most sense. His comment includes the qualifier for an occasion when 44 players are on a roster. Edited September 26, 2018 by Rod Black Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 43 minutes ago, szaroz71 said: Why? Other than you trying to be insulting, it says 3 shall be identified as quarterbacks. What part of that do you not comprehend? 25 minutes ago, Rod Black said: Szcrotum71, 17to85 is correct in his interpretation of the rule as constructed. It makes the most sense. His comment includes the qualifier for an occasion when 44 players are on a roster. can someone just ******* email the league please... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17to85 Posted September 26, 2018 Report Share Posted September 26, 2018 1 hour ago, szaroz71 said: Why? Other than you trying to be insulting, it says 3 shall be identified as quarterbacks. What part of that do you not comprehend? Oh well here is the problem, I read the entire rule and didn't stop after that bit. See like I said, your reading comprehension sucks. Go to the next part, the part that says 41 others. See now? Plus there's the fact that the Bombers dressed only 2 qbs for a few games back in 2003 so we know it's totally legit. But thanks for the laughs today. Always cute when people argue losing positions so hard. Shoulda just admitted you were wrong by slinking away rather than sticking around to prove your ignorance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 3 hours ago, Jpan85 said: Can only play special teams. Complicated rules... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthernSkunk Posted September 27, 2018 Report Share Posted September 27, 2018 Anybody got a ribbon for 17to85. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts