TBieber

Bombers have 42 turnovers, and given up 94 points off of them.
 
In wins: 14 turnovers (2.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
In losses: 28 turnovers (3.1/g), 78 points off (8.7/g)
 
Offence has turned the ball over atleast once in every game with a breakdown of:
1 - 1
2 - 8
3 - 3
4+ - 3
 
Bombers have 28 takeaways, and scored 69 points off of them.
 
In wins: 16 takeaways (2.7/g), 53 points off (8.8/g)
In losses: 12 takeaways (1.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
 
Defence has taken the ball away in 12 of 15 games, with a breakdown of:
1 - 4
2 - 3
3 - 3
4+ - 2
 
The Bombers are 3-0 in games with less turnovers. That's obvious, everyone knows that teams are more likely to win.
 
Here's the issue. They're 3-0 in games with less turnovers and they've played 15.... They have lost the turnover battle in 11 of those other 12 games and have a record of 3-8.
 
Now, if it was 1 turnover per game and they were losing, blame the defence perhaps for not doing their share in the turnover battle. But when - in 14 games, you have turned the ball over multiple times, that is clearly a problem.
 
Let's make that clear.
 
The Bombers have a record of 3-8 when losing the turnover battle. The rest of the league is 4-49. Four wins. The Bombers have three.
 
While the defence hasn't been spectacular, they have certainly done their job in having the Bombers at 6 wins, when they should, or could have 3 or 4.

Bombers have 42 turnovers, and given up 94 points off of them.
 
In wins: 14 turnovers (2.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
In losses: 28 turnovers (3.1/g), 78 points off (8.7/g)
 
Offence has turned the ball over atleast once in every game with a breakdown of:
1 - 1
2 - 8
3 - 3
4+ - 3
 
Bombers have 28 takeaways, and scored 69 points off of them.
 
In wins: 16 takeaways (2.7/g), 53 points off (8.8/g)
In losses: 12 takeaways (1.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
 
Defence has taken the ball away in 12 of 15 games, with a breakdown of:
1 - 4
2 - 3
3 - 3
4+ - 2
 
The Bombers are 3-0 in games with less turnovers. That's obvious, everyone knows that teams are more likely to win.
 
Here's the issue. They're 3-0 in games with less turnovers and they've played 15.... They have lost the turnover battle in 11 of those other 12 games and have a record of 3-8.
 
Now, if it was 1 turnover per game and they were losing, blame the defence perhaps for not doing their share in the turnover battle. But when - in 14 games, you have turned the ball over multiple times, that is clearly a problem.
 
Let's make that clear.
 
The Bombers have a record of 3-8 when losing the turnover battle. The rest of the league is 4-49. Four wins. The Bombers have three.
 
While the defence hasn't been spectacular, they have certainly done their job in having the Bombers at 6 wins, when they should, or could have 3 or 4.

Bombers have 42 turnovers, and given up 94 points off of them.
 
In wins: 14 turnovers (2.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
In losses: 28 turnovers (3.1/g), 78 points off (8.7/g)
 
Offence has turned the ball over atleast once in every game with a breakdown of:
1 - 1
2 - 8
3 - 3
4+ - 3
 
Bombers have 28 takeaways, and scored 69 points off of them.
 
In wins: 16 takeaways (2.7/g), 53 points off (8.8/g)
In losses: 12 takeaways (1.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
 
Defence has taken the ball away in 12 of 15 games, with a breakdown of:
1 - 4
2 - 3
3 - 3
4+ - 2
 
The Bombers are 3-0 in games with less turnovers. That's obvious, everyone knows that teams are more likely to win.
 
Here's the issue. They're 3-0 in games with less turnovers and they've played 15.... They have lost the turnover battle in 11 of those other 12 games and have a record of 3-8.
 
Now, if it was 1 turnover per game and they were losing, blame the defence perhaps for not doing their share in the turnover battle. But when - in 14 games, you have turned the ball over multiple times, that is clearly a problem.
 
Let's make that clear.
 
The Bombers have a record of 3-8 when losing the turnover battle. The rest of the league is 4-49. Four wins. The Bombers have three.
 
While the defence hasn't been spectacular, they have certainly done their job in having the Bombers at 6 wins, when they should, or could have 3 or 4.

Bombers have 42 turnovers, and given up 94 points off of them.
 
In wins: 14 turnovers (2.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
In losses: 28 turnovers (3.1/g), 78 points off (8.7/g)
 
Offence has turned the ball over atleast once in every game with a breakdown of:
1 - 1
2 - 8
3 - 3
4+ - 3
 
Bombers have 28 takeaways, and scored 69 points off of them.
 
In wins: 16 takeaways (2.7/g), 53 points off (8.8/g)
In losses: 12 takeaways (1.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
 
Defence has taken the ball away in 12 of 15 games, with a breakdown of:
1 - 4
2 - 3
3 - 3
4+ - 2
 
The Bombers are 3-0 in games with less turnovers. That's obvious, everyone knows that teams are more likely to win.
 
Here's the issue. They're 3-0 in games with less turnovers and they've played 15.... They have lost the turnover battle in 11 of those other 12 games and have a record of 3-8.
 
Now, if it was 1 turnover per game and they were losing, blame the defence perhaps for not doing their share in the turnover battle. But when - in 14 games, you have turned the ball over multiple times, that is clearly a problem.
 
Let's make that clear.
 
The Bombers have a record of 3-8 when losing the turnover battle. The rest of the league is 4-49. Four wins. The Bombers have three.
 
While the defence hasn't been spectacular, they have certainly done their job in having the Bombers at 6 wins, when they should, or could have 3 or 4.

Bombers have 42 turnovers, and given up 94 points off of them.
 
In wins: 14 turnovers (2.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
In losses: 28 turnovers (3.1/g), 78 points off (8.7/g)
 
Offence has turned the ball over atleast once in every game with a breakdown of:
1 - 1
2 - 8
3 - 3
4+ - 3
 
Bombers have 28 takeaways, and scored 69 points off of them.
 
In wins: 16 takeaways (2.7/g), 53 points off (8.8/g)
In losses: 12 takeaways (1.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
 
Defence has taken the ball away in 12 of 15 games, with a breakdown of:
1 - 4
2 - 3
3 - 3
4+ - 2
 
The Bombers are 3-0 in games with less turnovers. That's obvious, everyone knows that teams are more likely to win.
 
Here's the issue. They're 3-0 in games with less turnovers and they've played 15.... They have lost the turnover battle in 11 of those other 12 games and have a record of 3-8.
 
Now, if it was 1 turnover per game and they were losing, blame the defence perhaps for not doing their share in the turnover battle. But when - in 14 games, you have turned the ball over multiple times, that is clearly a problem.
 
Let's make that clear.
 
The Bombers have a record of 3-8 when losing the turnover battle. The rest of the league is 4-49. Four wins. The Bombers have three.
 
While the defence hasn't been spectacular, they have certainly done their job in having the Bombers at 6 wins, when they should, or could have 3 or 4.

Bombers have 42 turnovers, and given up 94 points off of them.
 
In wins: 14 turnovers (2.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
In losses: 28 turnovers (3.1/g), 78 points off (8.7/g)
 
Offence has turned the ball over atleast once in every game with a breakdown of:
1 - 1
2 - 8
3 - 3
4+ - 3
 
Bombers have 28 takeaways, and scored 69 points off of them.
 
In wins: 16 takeaways (2.7/g), 53 points off (8.8/g)
In losses: 12 takeaways (1.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
 
Defence has taken the ball away in 12 of 15 games, with a breakdown of:
1 - 4
2 - 3
3 - 3
4+ - 2
 
The Bombers are 3-0 in games with less turnovers. That's obvious, everyone knows that teams are more likely to win.
 
Here's the issue. They're 3-0 in games with less turnovers and they've played 15.... They have lost the turnover battle in 11 of those other 12 games and have a record of 3-8.
 
Now, if it was 1 turnover per game and they were losing, blame the defence perhaps for not doing their share in the turnover battle. But when - in 14 games, you have turned the ball over multiple times, that is clearly a problem.
 
Let's make that clear.
 
The Bombers have a record of 3-8 when losing the turnover battle. The rest of the league is 4-49. Four wins. The Bombers have three.
 
While the defence hasn't been spectacular, they have certainly done their job in having the Bombers at 6 wins, when they should, or could have 3 or 4.

Bombers have 42 turnovers, and given up 94 points off of them.
 
In wins: 14 turnovers (2.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
In losses: 28 turnovers (3.1/g), 78 points off (8.7/g)
 
Offence has turned the ball over atleast once in every game with a breakdown of:
1 - 1
2 - 8
3 - 3
4+ - 3
 
Bombers have 28 takeaways, and scored 69 points off of them.
 
In wins: 16 takeaways (2.7/g), 53 points off (8.8/g)
In losses: 12 takeaways (1.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
 
Defence has taken the ball away in 12 of 15 games, with a breakdown of:
1 - 4
2 - 3
3 - 3
4+ - 2
 
The Bombers are 3-0 in games with less turnovers. That's obvious, everyone knows that teams are more likely to win.
 
Here's the issue. They're 3-0 in games with less turnovers and they've played 15.... They have lost the turnover battle in 11 of those other 12 games and have a record of 3-8.
 
Now, if it was 1 turnover per game and they were losing, blame the defence perhaps for not doing their share in the turnover battle. But when - in 14 games, you have turned the ball over multiple times, that is clearly a problem.
 
Let's make that clear.
 
The Bombers have a record of 3-8 when losing the turnover battle. The rest of the league is 4-49. Four wins. The Bombers have three.
 
While the defence hasn't been spectacular, they have certainly done their job in having the Bombers at 6 wins, when they should, or could have 3 or 4.

Bombers have 42 turnovers, and given up 94 points off of them.
 
In wins: 14 turnovers (2.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
In losses: 28 turnovers (3.1/g), 78 points off (8.7/g)
 
Offence has turned the ball over atleast once in every game with a breakdown of:
1 - 1
2 - 8
3 - 3
4+ - 3
 
Bombers have 28 takeaways, and scored 69 points off of them.
 
In wins: 16 takeaways (2.7/g), 53 points off (8.8/g)
In losses: 12 takeaways (1.3/g), 16 points off (2.7/g)
 
Defence has taken the ball away in 12 of 15 games, with a breakdown of:
1 - 4
2 - 3
3 - 3
4+ - 2
 
The Bombers are 3-0 in games with less turnovers. That's obvious, everyone knows that teams are more likely to win.
 
Here's the issue. They're 3-0 in games with less turnovers and they've played 15.... They have lost the turnover battle in 11 of those other 12 games and have a record of 3-8.
 
Now, if it was 1 turnover per game and they were losing, blame the defence perhaps for not doing their share in the turnover battle. But when - in 14 games, you have turned the ball over multiple times, that is clearly a problem.
 
Let's make that clear.
 
The Bombers have a record of 3-8 when losing the turnover battle. The rest of the league is 4-49. Four wins. The Bombers have three.
 
While the defence hasn't been spectacular, they have certainly done their job in having the Bombers at 6 wins, when they should, or could have 3 or 4.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWuUGG_Ujf8

The key isn't experience, the key is hiring talented people. Trestman it is well documented accepted that he knew nothing about the CFL and dove into film and talked to people and actually learned what was working. I think a lot of people probably just come up thinking they'll pick up the nuances on the fly and don't appreciate the differences. So I don't care if someone is experienced or not, I care about if they're good enough to get the job done and part of that is knowing when you don't know something and learning what you don't know. 

I think a lot of this stems from MB's inability to move the pocket or to sell playaction...  he was having some success early in the season but teams have caught on and, as MB has always done, he has retreated to a more conservative offence as the season progresses.

Plenty assume that it's not Henry's fault. Watching the games a couple of times, I have laid the blame at about 60-40, with Henry being the 40%.

Edmonton signed Paris Jackson, which seems to confirm they were looking for a Canadian R.

This site is turning into Riderfans. And, quite frankly, turning me off.

Or as Ed Tait once referred to him, "Fanstone."

Call his own play.

The ads are fine. Fans call each other worse than horrible human beings.

Thanks for directing this back to football discussion - what the forum is for.
 
Chamblin left the door open for Doege to see the field in his scrum today, so I am under the impression that they will either have a couple packages ready for him, or else he will get some time if Sunseri struggles. Price I think is just a little too green to play just yet. I'd be giving him atleast 2 or 3 more weeks before even considering it.

Thanks for directing this back to football discussion - what the forum is for.
 
Chamblin left the door open for Doege to see the field in his scrum today, so I am under the impression that they will either have a couple packages ready for him, or else he will get some time if Sunseri struggles. Price I think is just a little too green to play just yet. I'd be giving him atleast 2 or 3 more weeks before even considering it.

I'm getting tired of all this **** and it's not just the Rider fans.
 
You guys are supposed to be able to moderate yourselves.
 
Figure it out.

He didn't get help from his receivers because he couldn't get the ball to his receivers.

It's not the same offence anymore, regardless of the players around Sunseri.

It's not the same offence anymore, regardless of the players around Sunseri.

It's not the same offence anymore, regardless of the players around Sunseri.