Eternal optimist

Sep-9-2017 Blue faithful show green Just how loud Winnipeg is With Glenn's patented picks Also fun fact: Moe Leggett had a pick 6 off of Glenn when he was playing for Montreal last year.

To be perfectly honest, I'm surprised Saskatchewan knows what decibels are, and how to track them.

Y'know what I'd say to the Rider fans that say this game was closer (causing higher decibels)? This is your inaugural season at Mosaic, Winnipeg's 2013 season stunk all sorts of ugly, but that home opener against Montreal was loud.

1. Leggett. Has to be. 2. Nichols, another huge game, minus his fumble. 3. I'm gonna go with Darvin Adams - although the entire receiving group stepped up big, he had some huge early catches to extend drives. HH to the fans at the game that had a giant sign that said FAKERS and all the fans that had red cards at the game. Bombers showing the Riders what they are, fans calling them out on it - FAKERS.

Roc Carmichael couldn't find Where's Waldo in an elevator, let alone any receivers. That guy was always getting burnt.

First off, nobody ever deserves this punishment. Ever. Secondly, I understand your gripe with the our defensive struggles; but I would argue our league is just having an abundantly offensive year, I've summarized the points per game, by team, below: Team Points per game Calgary (8-1-1) 18.70 Ottawa (4-6-1) 25.00 Saskatchewan (5-4) 25.22 Toronto (4-7) 25.27 Montreal (3-7) 26.30 League average 27.19 B.C. (5-5) 27.40 Edmonton (7-3) 29.50 Winnipeg (7-3) 31.60 Hamilton (1-8) 36.89 (source: http://www.oddsshark.com/cfl/defensive-stats) So, based on this - Winnipeg, on average, gives up 1 field goal more than the league average. It's also interesting that 3 of the "better" teams in the west (us, B.C. and Edmonton) all give up more points per game than the league average, yet have some of the better records in the league. Not sure if its valid, but it'd be interesting to see the points per game of the eastern teams versus western opponents, since I'm fairly certain that some of the low-scoring east-east affairs have caused their numbers to be artificially low (such as the Als 21-9 win over the Argos).

Honestly, I never expect the Bombers to win the LDC. That's not a knock against the Blue and Gold, it's just that Saskatchewan at home on Labour Day is the Bermuda Triangle of the CFL, bad teams win, weird things happen, cousins get kissed. The sky isn't falling.

LDC showdown: Hall's unorthodox new scheme?... Called "blown coverage"

They could score 40 points off of rouges for all I care, long as they find a way to win. Offense isn't the problem here... (yet), I think as a team though this problem only gets compounded as the season goes on (and gets colder). Our current team reminds me of Hamilton's 2011 team, high-flying offense, scored tons of points, got scored on tons. The problem though is when you play in November, especially outdoors, that fancy offense doesn't run as hot, and that's when our D really needs to step up.

I would argue his reaction was in respect to the massive defensive breakdown by the Esks that game. They could have given up anything else defensively and the Esks win that game.

As long as he has a pulse I don't see why not! He could also play RB on the offensive side of the ball... why not let him kick too? I heard linemen had to be good with their feet and have good footwork.

He means the 'Riders winning streak at home, they haven't lost since we beat them to help all of Canada celebrate Canada's 150th with an age old tradition: watching the Riders lose. Was extra special because as a statuatory holiday; we all got paid to watch it unfold.

This is a massive home-and-home series, as it is every year. A Bombers sweep would really separate from the other teams in the West, especially with Edmonton struggling. A Riders sweep lets them off the mat and quickly back into the western playoff race....

Y'know, for a flat province with no mountains, they sure do have a lot of trolls. Maybe there's a lot of bridges over there...do trolls hide under tractors? Maybe they're just overgrown gophers...

I'm sorry I can't hear you over our IKEA, the Winnipeg Jets, our 7-2 record and your teams' perpetual shade of green - the color of envy.

Not sure if it would factor into the decision, but on the radio they were mentioning Lankford is actually also our backup punter. Born in '89 so I was technically around when they last won, but I can relate to your plight.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Yeah I didn't mean the location or anything like that, sorry for the confusion.

Heartily agree... provided Winnipeg doesn't underestimate their opponent, they should come out with the W here. Montreal might be fired up though after getting spanked by Toronto this week.

Did anyone else notice that the gadget play was exact same one they ran late in the season last year against B.C.? Only difference was instead of Kohlert throwing it was Darvin Adams.

Obligatory mention that the Bombers ran a prevent D last night to perfection, holding Edmonton to 3 points in the closing minutes of the 4th.

My favorite part of this was it was on Military night, there was probably 30+ fans in the stadium that actually know how to fly planes.

1. Nichols - Managed the game well with patience, taking what the Eskimos D gave him. Biggest stat for him - 0 picks. 2. The entire D line - they had no sacks, but gotta give them some credit here, they contained Riley and forced him to throw from the pocket instead of picking up first downs with his legs. It takes disciplined play from the entire line to be able to do that and not get greedy. 3. Randle - I know the D had some lapses/unlucky breaks, but that pick before the half led to a TD, and completely swung momentum for the Bombers. Not to mention it was the difference on the scoreboard at the end of the night. Gotta mention that HH - Lapolice called a fantastic game, I also liked that the very first snap after Harris' fumble, Lapo went right back to him, instead of shying away. Showed trust in his RB and commitment to the running game - also good use of the Harris/Flanders combo.

Are you sure it wasn't 13? I feel like the Esks had 13 men trying to catch Harris, and still couldn't do it.