2-0 is the goal, Jake and that Dline should feast, 15th straight sellout, rain or not.........LETS ******* GO!!!!!!!

1 hour ago, Mike said:

All of this is very wrong for all of the reasons already outlined in the last dozen posts.

Brady, Demski, Nield, Neufeld, Wallace, Bryant

If we were using our ratio to its full extent, this easily accomplishes what we want it to without us being pigeon holed into a Canadian fullback, tight end, receiver, whatever for that last spot.

Yup...piss poor construct based soley on a coaches bias..

6 hours ago, Goalie said:

People were wrong. Dude obviously gives the coordinators their say. If you don’t think so guess Condell and younger are full of **** also cuz they say that. It’s collaborative. O’Shea likely has a say in special teams and the last couple Canadians on the roster. It’s why younger has all the Americans on the roster cuz younger wants them. Our D sucks through 2 games tho, our O doesn’t, our sp teams don’t. That’s on younger. I don’t care who the irrelevant 5th receiver is honestly.

We've had this discussion before. with you or others, I can't remember. A coaching staff is not a democracy. It's collaborative to a point. However, the Head Coach has final say in everything from play calling & schemes to personnel on the field. If Osh says no on any subjecy then the discussion is over. Yes, the D is on Younger responsibility but he still answers to Osh. If the HC wants to make changes like changing coordinators, simplifying the schemes or cutiing players then he will do it as he has that authority. Whether anyone disagrees or not.

1 hour ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

We've had this discussion before. with you or others, I can't remember. A coaching staff is not a democracy. It's collaborative to a point. However, the Head Coach has final say in everything from play calling & schemes to personnel on the field. If Osh says no on any subjecy then the discussion is over. Yes, the D is on Younger responsibility but he still answers to Osh. If the HC wants to make changes like changing coordinators, simplifying the schemes or cutiing players then he will do it as he has that authority. Whether anyone disagrees or not.

Basically...exactly..just way it is...as at end of day its his ass on the line and he has to answer to, and be responsible for end result...

44 minutes ago, Booch said:

Basically...exactly..just way it is...as at end of day its his ass on the line and he has to answer to, and be responsible for end result...

What's tough is when a longtime head coach is fired & then hired as a coordinator on another team. He goes from giving the ordred to taking them without fail. I always admired guys who were in that situation & put their egos in their pockets & became loyal assistants. Also kudos to the head coaches who hired them not worrying about whether they'll try to cut them off at the knees to get their jobs.

1 hour ago, Booch said:

Basically...exactly..just way it is...as at end of day its his ass on the line and he has to answer to, and be responsible for end result...

By that logic the ultimate responsibility for the roster construction is KWs. If he has a coach exhibiting flaws he is responsible for correcting it.