Bigblue204 Posted yesterday at 04:19 PM Report Posted yesterday at 04:19 PM 16 hours ago, Noeller said: I found that very curious.... And that Ferguson piece made me LOL.... No clue that Demski is hurt and zero mention of Trey Vaval.... He also pretends that Wheatfall is the #2 because of stats alone. Noeller 1
johnzo Posted yesterday at 04:28 PM Report Posted yesterday at 04:28 PM (edited) Back in the Cold Wars days, the CIA had a bunch of deep minds working in a field called "Kremlinology" which was about figuring out the true objectives and dynamics of the Soviet Union. The Soviets, being a secretive bunch, didn't talk a lot about their true feelings or objectives. They would have a message and they would stick to it. And so the Kremlinologists would have to read between the lines and use the tiniest tidbits, such as the arrangements of chairs or portraits in meetings, the positions of the soviet officials on parade, the scheduling and location of meetings, etc, to do their analysis. In the end, they found that most of their analysis wasn't super useful and was just about people looking for confirmation of their existing opinions. Today, I feel like some people are doing Oshology. Edited 6 hours ago by johnzo Goalie, K-Shack, wbbfan and 2 others 2 3
bigg jay Posted yesterday at 04:33 PM Report Posted yesterday at 04:33 PM 42 minutes ago, Tracker said: Soooo...to the article, Montreal has a decisive edge. I agree with the analysis but we shall see. For the most part, the article isn't wrong but when it is, it's way wrong. He has ST as a toss up but says "If James Letcher Jr. is in the lineup, his one play game-breaking ability is king and Montreal gets the nod", which is absolutely insane. Letcher had zero return touchdowns of any kind this season (and just 1 TD last year) while Vaval has four. But yeah Ferguson, you go on about a crazy game breaking ability that doesn't seem to exist and completely ignore the guy who should (imo) win ST player of the year. Not saying Letcher is a bad returner but Vaval was clearly the best this year so that should be a slam dunk category for us. Bubba Zanetti, Bigblue204, rebusrankin and 5 others 5 3
JuranBoldenRules Posted yesterday at 05:03 PM Report Posted yesterday at 05:03 PM Problem with Vaval is he's just as likely to fumble or gaffe that leads to an opposing score as he is to bust one. Tracker, Stickem and Bigblue204 1 2
Bigblue204 Posted yesterday at 06:13 PM Report Posted yesterday at 06:13 PM 1 hour ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Problem with Vaval is he's just as likely to fumble or gaffe that leads to an opposing score as he is to bust one. I disagree with this take completely...but it also doesn't change the fact that he has been the best return man all year and I believe he already has as many returns TDs as Letcher has in his career. wbbfan, Noeller and bb1 1 2
Bigblue204 Posted yesterday at 06:35 PM Report Posted yesterday at 06:35 PM Apparently Shawn Oakman is finding himself in some hot water on Social media. Some women talking about how much of ****** he is, includes screen shots of texts. Noeller and bigg jay 2
johnzo Posted yesterday at 07:18 PM Report Posted yesterday at 07:18 PM (edited) 2 hours ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Problem with Vaval is he's just as likely to fumble or gaffe that leads to an opposing score as he is to bust one. Vaval has four touchdowns and 11 returns of more than 30 yards and is tied for second in punt return average (12.8, behind Wooten's 15.0) ... the CFL does not track individual fumble stats but I'm pretty sure that Vaval nets out to a positive ... Edited yesterday at 07:18 PM by johnzo wbbfan, bb1, Bigblue204 and 1 other 2 2
Stickem Posted yesterday at 08:28 PM Report Posted yesterday at 08:28 PM Vaval has has a lot of upside....AND for a rook who has eclipsed a lot of other returners in 25' is certainly going to be in our line-up for quite awhile....He does have a tendency to try for extra yardage, that results in a few give-aways....something I'm sure he will correct as his experience grows....Who knows he eventually might get us to forget Janarion.......... Piggy 1 and Tracker 2
ShyGuy Posted yesterday at 08:29 PM Report Posted yesterday at 08:29 PM 1 hour ago, Bigblue204 said: Apparently Shawn Oakman is finding himself in some hot water on Social media. Some women talking about how much of ****** he is, includes screen shots of texts. Hopefully the league takes a look and takes appropriate action if any of those allegations are substantiated. wbbfan, BomberBall., bigg jay and 1 other 3 1
Noeller Posted yesterday at 09:17 PM Author Report Posted yesterday at 09:17 PM 49 minutes ago, Stickem said: Who knows he eventually might get us to forget Janarion.......... Long since done.... Grant did nothing this year. Goalie and johnzo 2
Goalie Posted yesterday at 10:55 PM Report Posted yesterday at 10:55 PM 1 hour ago, Noeller said: Long since done.... Grant did nothing this year. People forget he was prone to the fumbles also. That’s why he wasn’t in the nfl. Noeller 1
Noeller Posted yesterday at 11:13 PM Author Report Posted yesterday at 11:13 PM 17 minutes ago, Goalie said: People forget he was prone to the fumbles also. That’s why he wasn’t in the nfl. Also why Hamilton got rid of him... Goalie 1
Deiter Fan Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago (edited) On 2025-10-28 at 1:36 PM, rebusrankin said: and intangibles Like butter tarts and rice krispy squares?? 🤞 Edited 23 hours ago by Deiter Fan Tracker 1
wbbfan Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 6 hours ago, Bigblue204 said: I disagree with this take completely...but it also doesn't change the fact that he has been the best return man all year and I believe he already has as many returns TDs as Letcher has in his career. 5 hours ago, johnzo said: Vaval has four touchdowns and 11 returns of more than 30 yards and is tied for second in punt return average (12.8, behind Wooten's 15.0) ... the CFL does not track individual fumble stats but I'm pretty sure that Vaval nets out to a positive ... but hey why let reality get in the way of a hot take?
rebusrankin Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 31 minutes ago, Deiter Fan said: Like butter tarts and rice krispy squares?? 🤞 You know it. Deiter Fan 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 14 hours ago, Brandon said: No possible way That's what out HC does.
SpeedFlex27 Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, Goalie said: Any chance Schoen plays? Cuz the past. Is just a goodbye.
Blue In BC Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 21 hours ago, Stickem said: Vaval has has a lot of upside....AND for a rook who has eclipsed a lot of other returners in 25' is certainly going to be in our line-up for quite awhile....He does have a tendency to try for extra yardage, that results in a few give-aways....something I'm sure he will correct as his experience grows....Who knows he eventually might get us to forget Janarion.......... In theory he could be a Bomber for some time. OTOH, he might decide to use his NFL option window for another shot down south. We'd lose him for a 1/2 season or longer possibly. Woodbey might be another player interested in trying again. I'm not saying their play has necessarily attracted a lot of NFL interest but that doesn't stop them from signing some TC deal.
Atomic Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago (edited) Demski doubtful for Saturday Edited 4 hours ago by Atomic Noeller and K-Shack 2
bigg jay Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Atomic said: https://twitter.com/DTonOB/status/1983961814976360764 johnzo, Atomic and Noeller 2 1
Noeller Posted 4 hours ago Author Report Posted 4 hours ago I know our receiving corps is ****, but I still wouldn't play Demski this weekend... He's just gonna make it worse. bigg jay and Tracker 1 1
Stickem Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 14 minutes ago, Noeller said: I know our receiving corps is ****, but I still wouldn't play Demski this weekend... He's just gonna make it worse. I say we go with our best......lose and there's no tomorrow kind of scenario...I think if Demski is unable to go he'll be straight up about it and sit Edited 4 hours ago by Stickem
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now