Goalie Posted Tuesday at 09:45 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 09:45 PM (edited) Woods for Adams. Guaranteed. Mitchell replaces Cooley D Lawson replaces Parker If Canadian Lawson hurt then Cobb perhaps stays on or Peterson makes some sense also Ayers has been on the roster every week so don’t see them pulling him at all. Bryant for Lofton or Randolph or whoever filled in for him Edited Tuesday at 09:49 PM by Goalie
Tracker Posted yesterday at 02:42 AM Report Posted yesterday at 02:42 AM 5 hours ago, Bomberguy said: Couple of years ago during his first season. You could make a "Case" that this Mitchell guy doesn't look that bad 😁 Seems to have good hands and good speed but no burst off the line and doesn't seem to break tackles well.
Zach Schnitzer Posted yesterday at 03:36 AM Report Posted yesterday at 03:36 AM Was not impressed by Hogan’s comments yesterday. Defends an indefensible play call and throws his qb under the bus. Gotta wonder how the players feel. JohnnyAbonny, Sard, Bomberguy and 5 others 2 6
DTonOB Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 11 hours ago, Booch said: @DTonOB what did Ayers get for defensive snaps last game..and for yr? Ayers had 0 in the Week 9 Argos game. And for 17 for the season by my count. Sard, K-Shack, Booch and 4 others 3 4
M.O.A.B. Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago I hope these are the changes this week: COLLAROS for Artopeous - obviously BRYANT for Lofton - obviously, although I can see them keeping Lofton as LG. MITCHELL for Cooley - Mitchell is practicing with the 1s, looking more he will play this week PETERSON for Cobb - if Cooley is out, we need someone to backup Brady SCHMEKEL for C. Lawson - this if C.Lawson is out D. LAWSON for Parker - Parker will go to the 6-game, dont want Bridges back on that spot WOODS for Ayers - I hope they'll go DL-heavy this week. Mills will run all over us again BAILEY for Ball - I don't think we need 4 NAT DBs, I'll try this guy rebusrankin, JohnnyAbonny, Atomic and 1 other 4
Booch Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 1 hour ago, M.O.A.B. said: I hope these are the changes this week: COLLAROS for Artopeous - obviously BRYANT for Lofton - obviously, although I can see them keeping Lofton as LG. MITCHELL for Cooley - Mitchell is practicing with the 1s, looking more he will play this week PETERSON for Cobb - if Cooley is out, we need someone to backup Brady SCHMEKEL for C. Lawson - this if C.Lawson is out D. LAWSON for Parker - Parker will go to the 6-game, dont want Bridges back on that spot WOODS for Ayers - I hope they'll go DL-heavy this week. Mills will run all over us again BAILEY for Ball - I don't think we need 4 NAT DBs, I'll try this guy Like what u cooking...id go as far as keep Cobb on for Lawson if he can't go 5 hours ago, DTonOB said: Ayers had 0 in the Week 9 Argos game. And for 17 for the season by my count. Merci good sir And 2.5 snaps a game for a DA is really such a waste. Almost pointless and to not utilize a player for more than that as your DA is really a disservice to the roster...the way we shuttle guys on and off the field during a game, a roster spot where you could be getting a guy on who could be impactful while also being one your ST demons and basically having him stand around for most part is pretty weak JohnnyAbonny, BomberBall. and Stickem 3
BomberBall. Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 3 hours ago, Booch said: Like what u cooking...id go as far as keep Cobb on for Lawson if he can't go Merci good sir And 2.5 snaps a game for a DA is really such a waste. Almost pointless and to not utilize a player for more than that as your DA is really a disservice to the roster...the way we shuttle guys on and off the field during a game, a roster spot where you could be getting a guy on who could be impactful while also being one your ST demons and basically having him stand around for most part is pretty weak Yeah, it’s pretty hard to make an argument justifying this player/roster usage…. As well as others. Booch and rebusrankin 2
M.O.A.B. Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 14 hours ago, M.O.A.B. said: I hope these are the changes this week: COLLAROS for Artopeous - obviously BRYANT for Lofton - obviously, although I can see them keeping Lofton as LG. MITCHELL for Cooley - Mitchell is practicing with the 1s, looking more he will play this week PETERSON for Cobb - if Cooley is out, we need someone to backup Brady SCHMEKEL for C. Lawson - this if C.Lawson is out D. LAWSON for Parker - Parker will go to the 6-game, dont want Bridges back on that spot WOODS for Ayers - I hope they'll go DL-heavy this week. Mills will run all over us again BAILEY for Ball - I don't think we need 4 NAT DBs, I'll try this guy D. Lawson is practicing in field-side CB. So he is definitely in this week. The same with Woods. Hoping they keep both Woods and Adams in the roster.
Noeller Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago MOS had a lot of good things to say about Woods in Tait's piece today so that leads me to believe he's going to be in this week. Not sure whose spot he takes... rebusrankin 1
M.O.A.B. Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Noeller said: MOS had a lot of good things to say about Woods in Tait's piece today so that leads me to believe he's going to be in this week. Not sure whose spot he takes... Hope it's Ayers' rebusrankin and Booch 2
ShyGuy Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Lots of Calgary receivers still showing up on their injury report. Hopefully it forces them to mess with the ratio and designations again and Mills only gets 23 snaps again
JuranBoldenRules Posted 38 minutes ago Report Posted 38 minutes ago 1 hour ago, ShyGuy said: Lots of Calgary receivers still showing up on their injury report. Hopefully it forces them to mess with the ratio and designations again and Mills only gets 23 snaps again Not how that works. It gives them 25 snaps where he can sub for the Canadian. Otherwise he just replaces whichever import receiver who would basically be the designated import anyway.
ShyGuy Posted 23 minutes ago Report Posted 23 minutes ago 11 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Not how that works. It gives them 25 snaps where he can sub for the Canadian. Otherwise he just replaces whichever import receiver who would basically be the designated import anyway. PFF had him charted at 23 snaps which is why I used that number. He had 7 carries for 11 yards and they tried to swing one pass to him. Completely ineffective against a pretty mid defense against the rush. Maybe they got away from him as the game got away from the stamps but he should have been a bigger focal point
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now