JuranBoldenRules Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 35 minutes ago, Bubba Zanetti said: Masoli has a history of carving us up. Nothing very recent mind you, but he beat us up pretty good more than a couple times back in the day. If im not mistaken he set or tied a consecutive completions in a game record against us. Playing backups with nothing to lose always scares me(hello arbuckle). Rather play a gimpy Rourke personally. He was also like 2 feet away from completing a 70 yard bomb TD that would have made it a one score game with just under 2 minutes left. And if I were 2 feet taller I'd be a grizzly bear. HardCoreBlue, Noeller, rebusrankin and 2 others 1 4
Nolby Posted 18 hours ago Author Report Posted 18 hours ago 25 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: And if I were 2 feet taller I'd be a grizzly bear. And if my grandmother had wheels she would've been a bike
M.O.A.B. Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Bubba Zanetti said: Masoli has a history of carving us up. Nothing very recent mind you, but he beat us up pretty good more than a couple times back in the day. If im not mistaken he set or tied a consecutive completions in a game record against us. Playing backups with nothing to lose always scares me(hello arbuckle). Rather play a gimpy Rourke personally. He was also like 2 feet away from completing a 70 yard bomb TD that would have made it a one score game with just under 2 minutes left. Oooh, I'm scared now. Guess, I need to change my Lock of the Week pick now to Masoli and Pick 'Ems to BC. Edited 18 hours ago by M.O.A.B.
Mark H. Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 10 minutes ago, M.O.A.B. said: Oooh, I'm scared now. Guess, I need to change my Lock of the Week pick now to Masoli and Pick 'Ems to BC. Obviously Piggy 1 1
rebusrankin Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 8 hours ago, M.O.A.B. said: Oooh, I'm scared now. Guess, I need to change my Lock of the Week pick now to Masoli and Pick 'Ems to BC. Lock of the Week or your Shoe-In? I mean do you have a giant lock or a giant shoe? kelownabomberfan 1
17to85 Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago We're worrying about Masoli? Oh brother... based on what we saw last week that guy is absolutely cooked. Noeller and rebusrankin 2
Super Duper Negatron Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago Who know who else was cooked that we weren't worried about? Arbuckle. Bubba Zanetti 1
Bigblue204 Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Super Duper Negatron said: Who know who else was cooked that we weren't worried about? Arbuckle. We all know BC has a defense that will dominate at every level, create multiple turn overs and force our OC to make next to zero changes in what the O does because if it doesn't work 3 times it will work the 4th. Arbuckle played well. But he's not the reason the Argos won that game.
Booch Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 9 hours ago, M.O.A.B. said: Oooh, I'm scared now. Guess, I need to change my Lock of the Week pick now to Masoli and Pick 'Ems to BC. about as scary as those FBI warnings on video rentals.....soooooo scary Mark H., wbbfan, Piggy 1 and 1 other 4
Mark H. Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 3 hours ago, Booch said: about as scary as those FBI warnings on video rentals.....soooooo scary Terrifying. I threw out a box of VHS tapes because of that. Super Duper Negatron, Piggy 1 and Booch 3
Super Duper Negatron Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Mark H. said: Terrifying. I threw out a box of VHS tapes because of that. Confirmed - all of @Mark H.'s mattresses still have the original tags. rebusrankin, Mark H. and johnzo 1 2
Mark H. Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 48 minutes ago, Super Duper Negatron said: Confirmed - all of @Mark H.'s mattresses still have the original tags. Except for the straw ticks. Piggy 1 1
kelownabomberfan Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, Super Duper Negatron said: Confirmed - all of @Mark H.'s mattresses still have the original tags. won't ask how you know that.... Piggy 1 1
17to85 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 6 hours ago, Super Duper Negatron said: Who know who else was cooked that we weren't worried about? Arbuckle. As I said previously... arbuckle didn't do ****, our offense just did much much worse. Noeller 1
Bigblue204 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 7 minutes ago, 17to85 said: As I said previously... arbuckle didn't do ****, our offense just did much much worse. He did exactly what he had to do. Took what they gave him, took a couple chances that worked out and didn't make big time mistakes. His defence did the rest and controlled the game start to finish basically. Super Duper Negatron and wbbfan 2
wbbfan Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago (edited) No on said scared of Masoli, said, rather play rourke. I dont think rourke has a hope of beating us. What's it like as a coach balancing all these new designations... Mos "The good thing about our team is we don't even mess around with it." Well, you can't break the rules, right? Some guys only get so many snaps.. "Yeah, I we don't even venture down that road. So we wouldn't worry about breaking the rules because we're dont even enter into that conversation, never is a long time, but we haven't yet." What do you think about the rules "I don't think about it." Some people have asked if we use the designations and just don't announce it, and debated about it, but here it is from the horse's mouth. We don't use the extended roster flexibility that every other team in the league does. 6 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said: He did exactly what he had to do. Took what they gave him, took a couple chances that worked out and didn't make big time mistakes. His defence did the rest and controlled the game start to finish basically. Arbuckles' game would've been better than Zach's usual playoff performance level here, which is very, very sad. Edited 2 hours ago by wbbfan Bigblue204 1
blue85gold Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 19 minutes ago, 17to85 said: As I said previously... arbuckle didn't do ****, our offense just did much much worse. Flip side is that the Argo D went out and won the game for them. Our D did not.
Booch Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 8 minutes ago, wbbfan said: No on said scared of Masoli, said, rather play rourke. I dont think rourke has a hope of beating us. What's it like as a coach balancing all these new designations... Mos "The good thing about our team is we don't even mess around with it." Well, you can't break the rules, right? Some guys only get so many snaps.. "Yeah, I we don't even venture down that road. So we wouldn't worry about breaking the rules because we're dont even enter into that conversation, never is a long time, but we haven't yet." What do you think about the rules "I don't think about it." Some people have asked if we use the designations and just don't announce it, and debated about it, but here it is from the horse's mouth. We don't use the extended roster flexibility that every other team in the league does. Arbuckles' game would've been better than Zach's usual playoff performance level here, which is very, very sad. And it's stupid they don't...what point he trying to prove is a mystery And he yip yaps about everyone here as they give us a chance to win...yet continues to play the walking wounded...so obviously he is lying or full of **** but back it up if u gonna say it 1 minute ago, blue85gold said: Flip side is that the Argo D went out and won the game for them. Our D did not. Yup...as it's was a poor version of what we could have rostered Arbuckler took what was there..played within himself and their game plan was tailored for him to basically succeed if he was smart about it and patient..and he was Piggy 1 1
17to85 Posted 42 minutes ago Report Posted 42 minutes ago 1 hour ago, blue85gold said: Flip side is that the Argo D went out and won the game for them. Our D did not. Yes, however it's 3 years in a row of the offense being poor so maaaayyybeeeee it was a bomber O problem moreso than what the other D was doing.
Piggy 1 Posted 23 minutes ago Report Posted 23 minutes ago 2 hours ago, wbbfan said: No on said scared of Masoli, said, rather play rourke. I dont think rourke has a hope of beating us. What's it like as a coach balancing all these new designations... Mos "The good thing about our team is we don't even mess around with it." Well, you can't break the rules, right? Some guys only get so many snaps.. "Yeah, I we don't even venture down that road. So we wouldn't worry about breaking the rules because we're dont even enter into that conversation, never is a long time, but we haven't yet." What do you think about the rules "I don't think about it." Some people have asked if we use the designations and just don't announce it, and debated about it, but here it is from the horse's mouth. We don't use the extended roster flexibility that every other team in the league does. Arbuckles' game would've been better than Zach's usual playoff performance level here, which is very, very sad. I cringe when i watch these pressers, sometimes i wonder how the HELL he won this many games.
blue85gold Posted 21 minutes ago Report Posted 21 minutes ago 20 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Yes, however it's 3 years in a row of the offense being poor so maaaayyybeeeee it was a bomber O problem moreso than what the other D was doing. I think it's both. Bomber O sucked and also they have played hot defenses.
ShyGuy Posted 18 minutes ago Report Posted 18 minutes ago (edited) https://www.cfl.ca/2025/06/15/cfl-injury-reports-week-3/ Brady is officially out for Saturday. Looks like Rourke is trending towards not playing, but because the Lions only have 3 QBs signed he gets to sit on the active roster, and the Lions are also going to be without Berryhill who had a good week 1 but didn't do much last week. Edited 16 minutes ago by ShyGuy
Arnold_Palmer Posted 16 minutes ago Report Posted 16 minutes ago 1 minute ago, ShyGuy said: https://www.cfl.ca/2025/06/15/cfl-injury-reports-week-3/ Brady is official out for Saturday. Looks like Rourke is trending towards not playing, but because the Lions only have 3 QBs signed he gets to sit on the active roster, and the Lions are also going to be without Berryhill who had a good week 1 but didn't do much last week. Probably a smart decision from B.C, rib injury can be one of those long term lingering injuries, it’s a long season, no point risking further injury.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now