Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread

[Bigblue204]

19 hours ago, bigg jay said:

Plus that would mean the Riders would be in our dressing room.  The thought of watching them beat us in the GC at home and then going to celebrate in our room is just gross - no thank you.

Apparently they wouldn't be. Heard that the Bombers would still get their dressing room.

[bigg jay]

9 hours ago, Goalie said:

BC at zero suggests the dome plays a role. Winnipeg at 21 suggests we play outside more but also like to not start with the ball ever cuz every other team plays outside like us minus BC. 

Not really.  Argos/Stamps at only 2 & Als/Redblacks at 3 would suggest it's not dome related, and more about strategy.

It's a bit surprising when you consider we had Janarion Grant as a returner for most of that time period - you would think they'd want one of the best returners in the league doing his thing as much as possible.

[bigg jay]

4 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said:

Apparently they wouldn't be. Heard that the Bombers would still get their dressing room.

It's possible (there are 4 locker rooms at PAS) so the Western team could be placed in the Bisons locker room rather than the visitors room.

For a stadium that does not have that option, the CFL policy says that the Bombers would probably have to move.  FAQ about The League on CFLdb

Quote

The home team for the Grey Cup game is determined by the division of the host (archive of original source for those without access). When a Western Division city hosts the game, the Western Champion is the home team, when an Eastern Division city hosts the game, the Eastern Champion is the home team. This provides for who is the home and away for any regulations that specify the home or visiting team and for things like dressing rooms, etc. This practice began in 2007.

[17to85]

For a team that relied on grinding out wins, especially late in the game ensuring you have the wind in the long quarter isn't always a bad thing. 

[DTonOB]

17 hours ago, Noeller said:

I need context for this....

Doug doesn't like kicking off in both halves and said so during the Edmonton game and in the post-game show. O'Shea very clearly believes that kicking off twice is okay if he gets the wind in the long quarters. So, I was curious to find how many times each team had kicked off twice (as a proxy for 'taking the wind in the 4th').

 

[GCn20]

2 hours ago, DTonOB said:

Doug doesn't like kicking off in both halves and said so during the Edmonton game and in the post-game show. O'Shea very clearly believes that kicking off twice is okay if he gets the wind in the long quarters. So, I was curious to find how many times each team had kicked off twice (as a proxy for 'taking the wind in the 4th').

 

Yea....you looked it up and proved that MOS is onto something. Sitting back without context it appears to be a bad decision in theory. In actual practice you can't argue the results. Not just from the MOS led Bombers but overall.

3 hours ago, 17to85 said:

For a team that relied on grinding out wins, especially late in the game ensuring you have the wind in the long quarter isn't always a bad thing. 

Yep. There are a lot of things we can question MOS about but this isn't one of them imo. I'll take wind in the 4th over first possession of the half 9/10 times. It's the smart play imo.