Bigblue204 Posted yesterday at 02:20 PM Report Posted yesterday at 02:20 PM 1 minute ago, Noeller said: I'm in DTs CJOB league but could sign up for this as well, I suppose... yeah I'm in that one too Noeller 1
Booch Posted yesterday at 02:51 PM Report Posted yesterday at 02:51 PM 42 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said: I just made one https://gamezone.cfl.ca/fantasy/ - for anyone wanting to sign up whats the league name....I dont see it umless I'm just blind or dumb...possibly both 30 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said: yeah I'm in that one too same
Bigblue204 Posted yesterday at 02:54 PM Report Posted yesterday at 02:54 PM 2 minutes ago, Booch said: whats the league name....I dont see it umless I'm just blind or dumb...possibly both same Morning Big Blue Booch 1
Fatty Liver Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago 3 hours ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Pass protection has been getting worse and worse. Took them a long time to get going last season and we just got plain beat by Toronto's front every time we played them. OL and receiver are our two weak spots IMO, then edge rush. Honestly think that's why they're considering going 3 imports on the O-line, maybe not every game but they could pull a rabbit out of their hat whenever they play the Argos or Als, or any other team with a strong pass rush. If they lose the season series to these teams, good chance they lose the GC again. Stickem and wbbfan 2
JuranBoldenRules Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Fatty Liver said: Honestly think that's why they're considering going 3 imports on the O-line, maybe not every game but they could pull a rabbit out of their hat whenever they play the Argos or Als, or any other team with a strong pass rush. If they lose the season series to these teams, good chance they lose the GC again. Yeah might eventually get there. Tough right now with injuries on D to manage ratio. Maybe can lock in 2 Canadians on D later in the season as it plays out, especially if Wallace doesn't grab the LG spot or there are injuries to Canadians on OL. Piggy 1 and rebusrankin 2
Booch Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Fatty Liver said: Honestly think that's why they're considering going 3 imports on the O-line, maybe not every game but they could pull a rabbit out of their hat whenever they play the Argos or Als, or any other team with a strong pass rush. If they lose the season series to these teams, good chance they lose the GC again. Be a nice thing in theory...but in actuality you gotta go with your best 5...and let them work. Playing musical chairs on the oline especially is just a bad move. I'm actually not too concerned other than at center...it's the weak link and will radiate out...If they feel nobody in house is better...bring a new body in.....I think too last year Neuf was playing at lss than 100 percent all yr and that didnt help...Stan missed those games...so we had a lot of inconsistency...Dobson was good....but also had a few holes in his game and they were kind of a achilles heal...after his initial engagement he was lost...and if they twisted or stunted around or away from him...he got all confused...I think if its Eli or Wallace there we are better....Eli is a machine withtandem and getting into second level on a seek and destroy...but his collegiate coaching and training is the rason for that...and being ranked a top 3 center in the NFL draft if he didnt get hurt Wallace just oozes 1990's mauling nasty guard...just needs to play....as much as people like to think a season on the PR or backup with minimal reps develops a guy...it doesn't..they need to play...Practices and intra-squad stuff in this day and age isnt what it was like before If Randolph starts first game due to Lofton being not ready...He wont be letting go of that spot in my opinion...makes us better there as well 8 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Yeah might eventually get there. Tough right now with injuries on D to manage ratio. Maybe can lock in 2 Canadians on D later in the season as it plays out, especially if Wallace doesn't grab the LG spot or there are injuries to Canadians on OL. injuries aside...going 3 imports on oline is just a crippling blow on our defence side of ball....Let Eli or Wallace run with it and we be aight wbbfan, Piggy 1 and Tracker 1 2
Fatty Liver Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 4 hours ago, wbbfan said: Tackles are not a success indicator at db. Even at lber they still aren’t. Dl? Sure. You can have good tackles and bad tackles as a db. If you are having an extremely high volume of tackles as a db it is a sign of a problem. A big chunk of their tackles are runs into the secondary and down field completed passes. In holms case, he has always played in the trail position a lot. He uses his acceleration to get back in on plays and previous put up a ton of pass knock downs. He didn’t do that last year. He was coming over and helping get stops on other targets sure, he was also tackling completions for first downs on his own guys a lot. With the overall secondary as good as it was last year, Kramdi and holms spots got targeted more. Nichols has been the best tackler in our secondary since bas gc injury. A db with more tackles then him is not succeeding more. Doesn’t mean Kramdi and holms have to go. Holm needs to gauge his gap better this year so his close is putting him in place to prevent a completion rather than make a tackle attempt. Kramdi needs to capitalize better on his instincts and play with in his skill set more on pass downs. Nah can't find fault with Ian, he plays at an all-star level and could play on any team in the league. Early season he had to compensate for Ford while he found his range, other than that he was a great performer.
wbbfan Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Fatty Liver said: Nah can't find fault with Ian, he plays at an all-star level and could play on any team in the league. Early season he had to compensate for Ford while he found his range, other than that he was a great performer. Nichols sets the pace for all star dhbs in the league holm is in the second tier and last year wasn’t realistically at the top of that group. He we essentially never the guy in run fits either. He probably would start on most any team though. Noeller 1
johnzo Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago is Holm more suited to safety, where he can use his ludicrous range to make plays wherever they're needed? Or is he lacking something that would make him a good safety? Piggy 1 and JohnnyAbonny 2
Fatty Liver Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 5 minutes ago, johnzo said: is Holm more suited to safety, where he can use his ludicrous range to make plays wherever they're needed? Or is he lacking something that would make him a good safety? He's too valuable where he is to move him to Safety IMO. Piggy 1 1
M.O.A.B. Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 12 minutes ago, johnzo said: is Holm more suited to safety, where he can use his ludicrous range to make plays wherever they're needed? Or is he lacking something that would make him a good safety? Ask @Booch
Bigblue204 Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 16 minutes ago, johnzo said: is Holm more suited to safety, where he can use his ludicrous range to make plays wherever they're needed? Or is he lacking something that would make him a good safety? He would be a solid safety in todays game. But Parker is no slouch when it comes to speed. He ran down Ryhmes to save 1st place for the Bombers a couple years ago. wbbfan, Piggy 1 and Booch 2 1
Noeller Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 18 minutes ago, WinnipegGordo said: Kilter Brewing is doing a similar thing, but with better beer options. Bus leaves an hour before the game. WinnipegGordo and Piggy 1 2
Booch Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 11 minutes ago, M.O.A.B. said: Ask @Booch I think he'd make a better safety than HB...don't need a big hitter there in this system...he also kinda regressed last yr...save for WF where he was lights out. ..he was pretty meh most yr...got targeted alot.. yeah he made a whack of tackles for a HB but that not necessarily a good thing and a lot was after yards...and 1st downs gained...and he is weak in the run game At safety tho..his quick recognition and how he utilizes great angles to the ball...I could see close to double digit picks for him 11 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said: He would be a solid safety in todays game. But Parker is no slouch when it comes to speed. He ran down Ryhmes to save 1st place for the Bombers a couple years ago. Parker likely our fastest guy on team...and he saved the run of cups for us for sure...he came outta nowhere...I praise Kramdi on that play for his crappy open field tackling knack...killed the clock and if anyone thinks he purposely whiffed for that reason is full of sh!t...players aren't thinking like that in a game...especially a play like that and when it was...where it was...and importance of Piggy 1 and Bigblue204 2
Booch Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 32 minutes ago, Fatty Liver said: He's too valuable where he is to move him to Safety IMO. Parker...Griffin...Allen...would all do just fine there and be better in run game too...I bet if you go look at Bonds..Nichols..and Fords tackle totals they woukd be significant less...id bet by half for some....teams targeted the heck outta him...and his tackle numbers weren't cause he was running to the other side of field...leaving his man and bailing out safety...covering constantly for Ford....and if that was the case he'd be in NFL as he'd be super human...I will agree tho...he was in on a lot of Kramdis whiffs tho if u go back and look at film Piggy 1 1
Mike Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 52 minutes ago, Noeller said: Kilter Brewing is doing a similar thing, but with better beer options. Bus leaves an hour before the game. Thank you for your support Piggy 1 and Noeller 1 1
Noeller Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Mike said: Thank you for your support Always here for local beer!
johnzo Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago hard for me to complain / second-guess about the D. For all the hate on certain players, we were by far the best in the CFL by points allowed. We gave up 4 points a game less than the next best defence (which doesn't sound like a lot, but that's a huge gap over an 18-game season) And we were middle of the pack with giveaways, so we didn't get those good D numbers because our O always took care of the ball. Fatty Liver 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, johnzo said: is Holm more suited to safety, where he can use his ludicrous range to make plays wherever they're needed? Or is he lacking something that would make him a good safety? I don't think it really matters in our scheme. They are always in match coverages. Guys are jumping on routes not necessarily covering man and then making plays when the ball goes to them. Noeller, rebusrankin and Piggy 1 3
BomberBall. Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 4 hours ago, Noeller said: Kilter Brewing is doing a similar thing, but with better beer options. Bus leaves an hour before the game. TCB did it last year too, so I assume they will again. Kilter has the better beer though, for sure. Noeller 1
wbbfan Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 4 hours ago, johnzo said: is Holm more suited to safety, where he can use his ludicrous range to make plays wherever they're needed? Or is he lacking something that would make him a good safety? Hes a lateral quick guy and not a physical guy. Hes not great at reading breaks and bending guys off their route. He wouldn’t be bad at S, but I don’t think he upgraded by moving to that spot. If any thing, in our system I think he’d be better as the dime/wil or maybe the Sam if we don’t use the same in run fits. 4 hours ago, Bigblue204 said: He would be a solid safety in todays game. But Parker is no slouch when it comes to speed. He ran down Ryhmes to save 1st place for the Bombers a couple years ago. Brings tremendous physicality despite his stature too. Hes a real down hill type. 4 hours ago, Fatty Liver said: He's too valuable where he is to move him to Safety IMO. In our system I think a S is worth more than most in the cfl, but I do agree I think he’s better at half which is more valuable. IMO perfect world, I’d swap Kramdi to S, where he can play down hill and have time to make good decisions, holm to Sam out of the fits and Parker or griffin to half over holm in the fit. Even that though is a lot of change and I don’t think we need to change much. The time itd take to settle we’d be better off rolling as is. Having athletic/rangy physical lbers who can make tackles and actually be at proper depth making good decisions in the lber core is going to make a huge difference. We relied on the secondary a lot the last two years to basically also do the lbers job, and with no pressure from the front. Bigblue204 1
Noeller Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 31 minutes ago, BomberBall. said: TCB did it last year too, so I assume they will again. Kilter has the better beer though, for sure. TCB is more than solid... Lamplighter is up there with the Bulldog for best Amber jn the city. Tremendous. And wonderful pizza. But man oh man... Summertime in the River City, give me a Juicii and a 'dog on the patio, and I am a happy camper.... BomberBall., Atomic and Bigblue204 3
Booch Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 1 hour ago, wbbfan said: Hes a lateral quick guy and not a physical guy. Hes not great at reading breaks and bending guys off their route. He wouldn’t be bad at S, but I don’t think he upgraded by moving to that spot. If any thing, in our system I think he’d be better as the dime/wil or maybe the Sam if we don’t use the same in run fits. Brings tremendous physicality despite his stature too. Hes a real down hill type. In our system I think a S is worth more than most in the cfl, but I do agree I think he’s better at half which is more valuable. IMO perfect world, I’d swap Kramdi to S, where he can play down hill and have time to make good decisions, holm to Sam out of the fits and Parker or griffin to half over holm in the fit. Even that though is a lot of change and I don’t think we need to change much. The time itd take to settle we’d be better off rolling as is. Having athletic/rangy physical lbers who can make tackles and actually be at proper depth making good decisions in the lber core is going to make a huge difference. We relied on the secondary a lot the last two years to basically also do the lbers job, and with no pressure from the front. When u look at our scheme at times we almost have a free and strong safety look in some sets 1 hour ago, wbbfan said: Hes a lateral quick guy and not a physical guy. Hes not great at reading breaks and bending guys off their route. He wouldn’t be bad at S, but I don’t think he upgraded by moving to that spot. If any thing, in our system I think he’d be better as the dime/wil or maybe the Sam if we don’t use the same in run fits. Brings tremendous physicality despite his stature too. Hes a real down hill type. In our system I think a S is worth more than most in the cfl, but I do agree I think he’s better at half which is more valuable. IMO perfect world, I’d swap Kramdi to S, where he can play down hill and have time to make good decisions, holm to Sam out of the fits and Parker or griffin to half over holm in the fit. Even that though is a lot of change and I don’t think we need to change much. The time itd take to settle we’d be better off rolling as is. Having athletic/rangy physical lbers who can make tackles and actually be at proper depth making good decisions in the lber core is going to make a huge difference. We relied on the secondary a lot the last two years to basically also do the lbers job, and with no pressure from the front. Lot of people forget...or maybe don't understand how good Parker is...we didn't hang on to him for 2 years when he was hurt a fair bit to be nice guys wbbfan 1
17to85 Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 1 hour ago, Noeller said: Lamplighter is up there with the Bulldog for best Amber jn the city. What like 15 years ago? Bulldog was a fine option when options were limited but the style has progressed since then.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now