Jump to content

K-Shack

Members
  • Posts

    197
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by K-Shack

  1. 9 hours ago, Dodge and Burn said:

    Why did we defer to the second half and still kick to them?

    O'Shea has done that often, and I've always found it strange. I guess he values the wind more than the extra possession, but from my seats up high, I don't think the wind was much of a factor yesterday and especially with the score as it was.

    Or to copy @DTonOB, perhaps O'Sh just wanted to give Jeffcoat a chance to crush Riders' souls 

  2. 1. Brady -- he's absolutely the Most Outstanding Canadian and perhaps the Most Outstanding Player in the league. 200 yards in 3 quarters and change. Unreal.

    2. Zach -- efficient, 5 TDs, using his legs to extend a drive, that shovel pass to Brady. Wow 

    3. Kenny and Dalton -- Lawler earning his current paycheque and Schoen his future one.

    HH. Jackson (of the Jeffcoat not Damian varietal) -- a disruptive force and that strip sack. Wow.

    Good luck charm -- My 6 year old who went to her first game today and got to see us hang half a hundred on them. The second most special Bomber game I've attended after the 2019 Cup

  3. I went to the 2019 Cup not expecting a win (I had more hope going into the 2011 Cup, the other time I went to the game), but feeling like I needed to be there just in case we beat what turned out to be paper Tigercats. Suffice to say I'm very glad I went. 

    Hope for the best, expect the worst, and sometimes you get to see the first Grey Cup win since you were 8 years old.

  4. 5 hours ago, Booch said:

    yup....there no reason we cant move on from Kramdi...Kolo...Briggs..Thomas..Cadwallder...Hallett contracts that are not league minimums and replace them with cheaper and the same if not better talent, and use that surplus for a Schoen and whomever neds a bump....Looking at roster he is the only one requiring a significant raise

    Houston may also be due for a raise but I think he's more replaceable if need be with ADS and others able to take on a corner spot. The other players that come to mind are Dobson and Eli, depending on contract status.

  5. The second pick six was a great play by the safety but the other two picks seemed more questionable to me. Throwing across his body for the first pick six and underthrowing into what ended up being double coverage on the Lawler pick, not really letting him high point it. It seemed to me that he was having difficulty climbing the pocket in the first half, even on situations where we had it locked down (Brady had a phenomenal multiple second block on one of Zach's rollouts).

    But then in the second half, I was so impressed by how Zach settled into the pocket for several throws in addition to his classic rollout to the right.

  6. 2 hours ago, Goalie said:

    Can we not play Parker at SAM? That is a weak spot on D right now I'd say. We start more than the minimum required Canadians I believe so what's the issue there. Darby hasn't been great, kramdi gets picked on. 

    Yeah I'm curious if Darby is even getting reps at this point. Are we bringing him in on second and long? Is he playing specials? I'd much rather have Parker in his place

    Also bemused / confused that they keep listing Parker on the injury report when it's "Not Injury Related"

     

  7. 16 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    Absolutely hilarious and I had a good laugh at what you wrote here.    I took a minute and I'm still debating if I'm now interacting with an incel or just someone who is just very odd.  Either way yes it is normal for men to look at women and at times say they are attractive.    I'm somewhat certain that physical beauty is still a thing in this world.   Either way Chris Streveler is a handsome man and his girlfriend is also very attractive.   They make a nice couple and hopefully he brings her back to Winnipeg once ZC hangs it up and Strevolution continues with the Blue Bombers.  

     

    Since you're curious about whether I'm an incel (and I don't think you really understand the anti-feminist implications of that term) or just "very odd" -- I'll out myself as being a member of the latter category. I'll happily identify as a "very odd" feminist husband and father who thinks that commenting on a woman's appearance is a form of objectification when it's irrelevant to the topic (the irrelevance at least we agree upon) and that being attracted to women is not required to be a "normal male" (did you know that "normal" men are not always hetero?). I'll show myself out, but in my closing words I'll invite you to reflect upon who may feel unwelcome by your comments here. 

×
×
  • Create New...